Message 125462 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	loewis
Recipients	kermode, loewis, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, pitrou, rupole, teoliphant
Date	2011-01-05.19:40:41
SpamBayes Score	0.0039243386
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<4D24C938.50100@v.loewis.de>
In-reply-to	<1294152882.35.0.707448361917.issue10181@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
> Martin, we would like to exclude Py_buffer from the stable ABI for > Python 3.2, until we have a chance to thrash out the missing pieces > of the documentation for 3.3. I think it is a documentation > problem, but until we're certain, it seems safer to leave it out. Fine with me. Attached is a patch; it would be good if someone could confirm that this exactly comprises the API that should be hidden.

> Martin, we would like to exclude Py_buffer from the stable ABI for
> Python 3.2, until we have a chance to thrash out the missing pieces
> of the documentation for 3.3. I *think* it is a documentation
> problem, but until we're certain, it seems safer to leave it out.

Fine with me. Attached is a patch; it would be good if someone could
confirm that this exactly comprises the API that should be hidden.

Files
File name	Uploaded
pybuffer.diff	loewis, 2011-01-05.19:40:41

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2011-01-05 19:40:44	loewis	set	recipients: + loewis, teoliphant, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, rupole, kermode, pitrou
2011-01-05 19:40:41	loewis	link	issue10181 messages
2011-01-05 19:40:41	loewis	create