Skip to main content

Applicability of Indexed Grammars to Natural Languages

  • Chapter
Natural Language Parsing and Linguistic Theories

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 35))

Abstract

If we take the class of context-free phrase structure grammars (CFPSGs) and modify it so that (i) grammars are allowed to make use of finite feature systems and (ii) rules are permitted to manipulate the features in arbitrary ways, then what we end up with is equivalent to what we started out with. Suppose, however, that we take the class of contextfree phrase structure grammars and modify it so that (i) grammars are allowed to employ a single designated feature that takes stacks of items drawn from some finite set as its values, and (ii) rules are permitted to push items onto, pop items from, and copy the stack. What we end up with now is no longer equivalent to the CF-PSGs but is significantly more powerful, namely the indexed grammars (Aho, 1968). This class of grammars has been alluded to a number of times in the recent linguistic literature: by Klein (1981) in connection with nested comparative constructions, by Dahl (1982) in connection with topicalised pronouns, by Engdahl (1982) and Gazdar (1982) in connection with Scandinavian unbounded dependencies, by Huybregts (1984) and Pulman and Ritchie (1984) in connection with Dutch, by Marsh and Partee (1984) in connection with variable binding, and doubtless elsewhere as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aho, Alfred V. 1968. Indexed Grammars. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 15:647–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aho, Alfred V. 1969. Nested Stack Automata. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 16:383–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan W., Ronald M. Kaplan, P. Stanley Peters, and Annie Zaenen. 1982. Cross-serial Dependencies in Dutch. Linguistic Inquiry 13:613–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertsch, Eberhard. 1975. Two Thoughts on’ Fast Recognition of Indexed Languages. Information and Control 29:381–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, John S. 1975. Adjectives and Adverbs in English. Foundations of Language 13:529–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culy, Christopher. 1985. The Complexity of the Vocabulary of Bambara. Linguistics and Philosophy 8:345–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Osten. 1982. Bound Pronouns in Dislocated Constituents. Manuscript, University of Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damm, Werner. 1982. The IO-and OI-hierarchies. Theoretical Computer Science 20:95–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl, Elisabet. 1980. The Syntax and Semantics of Questions in Swedish. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl, Elisabet. 1982. Restrictions on Unbounded Dependencies in Swedish. In Elisabet Engdahl and Eva Ejerhed (Eds.), Readings on Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell, 151–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelfriet, Joost and Erik Meineche Schmidt. 1977/78. IO and OI. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 15:328–353; 16:67–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, Gerald. 1982. Phrase Structure Grammar. In Pauline Jacobson and Geoffrey K. Pullum (Eds.), The Nature of Syntactic Representation. Dordrecht: Reidel, 131–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, Gerald and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 1985. Computationally Relevant Properties of Natural Languages and Their Grammars. New Generation Computing 3:273–306. [Also appeared as CSLI Report CSLI-85-24, Stanford, May 1985.]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, Takeshi. 1973. On Derivation Trees of Indexed Grammars—an Extension of the uvwxy Theorem. Publ. RIMS (Kyoto University) 9:61–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopcroft, John and Jeffrey Ullman. 1979. Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huybregts, Riny. 1984. The Weak Inadequacy of Context-free Phone Structure Grammars. In Ger de Haan, Mieke Trommelen and Wim Zonneveld. (Eds.), Van Periferie naar Kern. Dordrecht: Foris

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Ewan. 1981. The Syntax and Semantics of Nominal Comparatives. In M. Moneglia (Ed.), Atti de Seminario su Tempo e Verbale Strutture Quantificate in Forma Logica. Florence: Presso l’Accademia della Crusca

    Google Scholar 

  • Maibaum, T. S. E. 1974. A Generalized Approach to Formal Languages. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 8:409–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maling, Joan and Annie Zaenen. 1982. A Phrase Structure Account of Scandinavian Extraction Phenomena. In Pauline Jacobson and Geoffrey K. Pullum (Eds.) The Nature of Syntactic Representation. Dordrecht: Reidel. 229–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, William E. 1985. Some Conjectures on Indexed Languages. Paper presented to the Association for Symbolic Logic Meeting, Stanford University, July 15–19, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, William E. and Barbara H. Partee. 1984. How Non-context-free is Variable Binding? In Mark Cobler et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Stanford: Stanford Linguistics Association, 179–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parchmann, R., J. Duske and J. Specht. 1980a. On Deterministic Indexed Languages. Information and Control 45:48–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parchmann, R., J. Duske and J. Specht. 1980b. Closure Properties of Deterministic Indexed Languages. Information and Control 46:200–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, Carl J. 1984. Generalized Phrase Structure Grammars, Head Grammars, and Natural Languages. Phd thesis, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, Carl J. 1985. Some Extensions of Context-free Grammars and Their Time Complexity. Paper presented to the Santa Cruz Workshop on the Mathematics of Grammars and Languages, June 25–28, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulman, Stephen G. and Graeme D. Ritchie. 1984. Indexed Grammars and Intersecting Dependencies. Unpublished paper, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1983. Context-freeness and the Computer Processing of Human Languages. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting, Association for Computational Linguistics, Menlo Park, CA, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullum, Geoffrey K. and Gerald Gazdar. 1982. Natural Languages and Context-free Languages. Linguistics and Philosophy 4:471–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sag, Ivan A., Gerald Gazdar, Thomas Wasow and Steven Weisler. 1985. Coordination and How to Distinguish Categories. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3:117–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shieber, Stuart M. 1985. Evidence Against the Context-freeness of Natural Language. Linguistics and Philosophy 8:333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaenen, Annie, Elisabet Engdahl and Joan Maling. 1981. Resumptive Pronouns can be Syntactically Bound. Linguistic Inquiry 12:679–682.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gazdar, G. (1988). Applicability of Indexed Grammars to Natural Languages. In: Reyle, U., Rohrer, C. (eds) Natural Language Parsing and Linguistic Theories. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 35. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1337-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1337-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-55608-056-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1337-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Publish with us

Policies and ethics