Skip to main content
Log in

Mandibular ontogeny in the miocene great apeDryopithecus

  • Published:
International Journal of Primatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The type mandible of Dryopithecus fontani,Lartet 1856, has been discovered to be not fully adult. Its development corresponds in dental age to that of a 6-to 8-year-old chimpanzee. Because of its immaturity, a number of seemingly distinctive features of this mandible (some of which resemble hominids) would have been lost with full adulthood. Closed tooth rows, a recurved canine, and a vertical ascending mandibular ramus are related to the age of the specimen. They therefore do not foreshadow hominid characteristics. It is stressed that consideration of individual age is an important factor in interpreting the dentitions of fossil and extant hominoids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dean, M. C., and Wood, B. A. (1981). Developing pongid dentition and its use for aging individual crania in comparative cross-sectional growth studies.Folia primatol. 36: 111–127.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudry, A. (1878).Les enchaÎnements du monde animal dans les temps géologiques. Mammiferes tertiaires, Masson, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudry, A. (1890). Le Dryopithèque.Mém. Soc. Géol. France 1:5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genet-Varcin, E. (1963).Les Singes actuels et fossiles, Boubée Paris.

  • Harlé, E. (1898). Une mâchoire de Dryopithèque.Bull. Soc. Géol. France Sér. 3 26: 377–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlé, E. (1899). Nouvelles pièces de Dryopithèque et quelques cocquilles de Saint-Gaudens (Haute-Garonne).’Bull. Soc. Géol. France Sér. 3 27: 304–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lartet, E. (1856). Note sur un grand Singe fossile qui se rattache au groupe des Singes Supérieurs.C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 43:219–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Gros Clark, W. E., and Leakey, L. S. B. (1951). The Miocene Hominoidea of East Africa.Fossil Mamm. Afr. 1: 1–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, A. E. (1975). Paleodemographic aspects of the South African australopithecines.Univ. Penn. Publ. Anthropol. 1:1–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilbeam, D. R., and Simons, E. L. (1971). On the humerus ofDryopithecus from Saint-Gaudens, France.Nature 229:406–407.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piveteau, J. (1957).Traité de Paléontologie, Vol. 7, Masson, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, A. H. (1956). Postembryonic age changes.Primatologia 1: 887–964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, E. L. (1972).Primate Evolution: An Introduction to Man’s Place in Nature, Macmillan, New York; Collier, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, E. L., and Pilbeam, D. R. (1965). Preliminary revision of the Dryopithecinae (Pongidae, Anthropoidea).Folia primatol. 3: 81–152.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simons, E.L., Meinel, W. Mandibular ontogeny in the miocene great apeDryopithecus . Int J Primatol 4, 331–337 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02735598

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02735598

Key words