Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

The effects of high protein intakes during energy restriction on body composition, energy metabolism and physical performance in recreational athletes

Abstract

Background

Athletes employ weight loss practices to lower body fat and maintain fat-free mass (FFM). High protein diets have been shown to produce greater fat loss and retention of lean mass during periods of energy restriction (ER) in sedentary individuals with obesity, but less is known about the effects of high protein diets in trained individuals during ER. Although current recommendations for protein intake in active individuals are 1.2–1.7 g/kg, it is unclear whether higher intakes are necessary to maximize FFM retention and maximize physical performance in athletes undergoing periods of ER.

Objective

Determine whether high protein intakes could maximize FFM retention and physical performance in trained individuals after a period of ER.

Methods

Twenty-one college aged athletes underwent a 6-week 25% ER + 3-day full body resistance training. Participants were randomly assigned to a low (~1.2 g/kg), moderate (~1.6 g/kg) or high (~2.2 g/kg) protein intake. Baseline and post-intervention outcomes: Dual X-ray absorptiometry, isotopic water dilution, indirect calorimetry, dietary records and strength based physical testing.

Results

Significant reductions in body mass (p = 0.047) and fat mass (p = 0.04) with simultaneous increases in FFM (p = 0.037) were noted for all groups, with no protein intake effect. Significant increases in physical performance outcomes (5RM strength) were noted for most measures (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Current protein intake recommendations of 1.2–1.7 g/kg appear sufficient for most athletes even during periods of ER to maintain FFM and physical performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Changes in body composition across all groups from pre- to post-intervention (n = 21).
Fig. 2: Changes in protein mass across the whole sample from pre- to post-intervention.
Fig. 3: Changes in physical performance across the whole sample size from pre- to post-intervention (n = 21).

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The collected and analysed data sets of the current study are not publicly available. De-identified and processed data can be requested from the corresponding author for academic purposes after completing a signed data access form. Only de-identified data can be provided to protect participant privacy.

References

  1. Rankin JW. Weight loss and gain in athletes. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2002;1:208–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Trexler ET, Smith-Ryan AE, Norton LE. Metabolic adaptation to weight loss: implications for the athlete. J Int Soc Sports Nutrition. 2014;11:1–7.

  3. Huovinen HT, Hulmi JJ, Isolehto J, Kyröläinen H, Puurtinen R, Karila T, et al. Body composition and power performance improved after weight reduction in male athletes without hampering hormonal balance. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29:29–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Melin AK, Heikura IA, Tenforde A, Mountjoy M. Energy availability in athletics: health, performance, and physique. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2019;29:152–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Halton TL, Hu FB. The effects of high protein diets on thermogenesis, satiety and weight loss: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2004;23:373–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Longland TM, Oikawa SY, Mitchell CJ, Devries MC, Phillips SM. Higher compared with lower dietary protein during an energy deficit combined with intense exercise promotes greater lean mass gain and fat mass loss: a randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103:738–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lemon PWR. Beyond the zone: protein needs of active individuals. J Am Coll Nutr. 2000;19:513S–521S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Elia M, Stubbs RJ, Henry CJK. Differences in fat, carbohydrate, and protein metabolism between lean and obese subjects undergoing total starvation. Obes Res. 1999;7:597–604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu G. Dietary protein intake and human health. Food Funct. 2016;7:1251–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morton RW, Murphy KT, McKellar SR, Schoenfeld BJ, Henselmans M, Helms E, et al. A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training-induced gains in muscle mass and strength in healthy adults. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52:376–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pearson AG, Alexander L, Witard OC, Coughlin TE, Tipton KD, Walshe IH. A hypoenergetic diet with decreased protein intake does not reduce lean body mass in trained females. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021;121:771–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Calcagno M, Kahleova H, Alwarith J, Burgess NN, Flores RA, Busta ML, et al. The thermic effect of food: a review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2019;38:547–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hintze LJ, Goldfield G, Seguin R, Damphousse A, Riopel A, Doucet É. The rate of weight loss does not affect resting energy expenditure and appetite sensations differently in women living with overweight and obesity. Physiol Behav. 2019;199:314–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lawton C. Highlights of the 2003 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada. CANNT J. 2004;14:40–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schoenfeld BJ. The mechanisms of muscle hypertrophy and their application to resistance training. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24:2857–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schoenfeld BJ, Ogborn D, Krieger JW. Dose-response relationship between weekly resistance training volume and increases in muscle mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Sci. 2017;35:1073–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schoenfeld BJ, Contreras B, Krieger J, Grgic J, Delcastillo K, Belliard R, et al. Resistance training volume enhances muscle hypertrophy but not strength in trained men. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51:94–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moon JR, Tobkin SE, Roberts MD, Dalbo VJ, Kerksick CM, Bemben MG, et al. Total body water estimations in healthy men and women using bioimpedance spectroscopy: a deuterium oxide comparison. Nutr Metab. 2008;5:7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Revesz KM, Landwehr JM, Keybl J. Measurement of delta 13 C and delta 18 O isotopic ratios Of CaCO3 using a thermoquest Finnigan GasBench II Delta Plus XL continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometer with application to Devils Hole Core DH-11 Calcite. No 2001-57. 2001.

  20. Hintze LJ, Messier V, Lavoie M-È, Brochu M, Lavoie J-M, Prud’homme D, et al. A one-year resistance training program following weight loss has no significant impact on body composition and energy expenditure in postmenopausal women living with overweight and obesity. Physiol Behav. 2018;189:99–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cooper JA, Watras AC, O’Brien MJ, Luke A, Dobratz JR, Earthman CP, et al. Assessing validity and reliability of resting metabolic rate in six gas analysis systems. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109:128–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Blond E, Maitrepierre C, Normand S, Sothier M, Roth H, Goudable J, et al. A new indirect calorimeter is accurate and reliable for measuring basal energy expenditure, thermic effect of food and substrate oxidation in obese and healthy subjects. E-SPEN Eur E-J Clin Nutr Metab. 2011;6:e7–e15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lasevicius T, Ugrinowitsch C, Schoenfeld BJ, Roschel H, Tavares LD, De Souza EO, et al. Effects of different intensities of resistance training with equated volume load on muscle strength and hypertrophy. Eur J Sport Sci. 2018;18:772–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. De Boer MR, Waterlander WE, Kuijper LD, Steenhuis IH, Twisk JW. Testing for baseline differences in randomized controlled trials: an unhealthy research behavior that is hard to eradicate. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Hall KD. What is the required energy deficit per unit weight loss? Int J Obes. 2008;32:573–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mettler S, Mitchell N, Tipton KD. Increased protein intake reduces lean body mass loss during weight loss in athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:326–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Murphy CH, Hector AJ, Phillips SM. Considerations for protein intake in managing weight loss in athletes. Eur J Sport Sci. 2015;15:21–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Phillips SM, Van Loon LJC. Dietary protein for athletes: from requirements to optimum adaptation. J Sports Sci. 2011;29:S29–S38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tipton KD. Efficacy and consequences of very-high-protein diets for athletes and exercisers. Proc Nutr Soc. 2011;70:205–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pasiakos SM, Cao JJ, Margolis LM, Sauter ER, Whigham LD, McClung JP, et al. Effects of high‐protein diets on fat‐free mass and muscle protein synthesis following weight loss: a randomized controlled trial. FASEB J. 2013;27:3837–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wierik E, Hoogzaad L, Van Den Berg H, Schaafsma G. Effects of moderate energy restriction on physical performance and substrate utilization in non-obese men. Int J Sports Med. 1994;15:478–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Schoenfeld BJ, Alto A, Grgic J, Tinsley G, Haun CT, Campbell BI, et al. Alterations in body composition, resting metabolic rate, muscular strength, and eating behavior in response to natural bodybuilding competition preparation: a case study. J Strength Cond Res. 2020;34:3124–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Baldwin KM, Joanisse DR, Haddad F, Goldsmith RL, Gallagher D, Pavlovich KH, et al. Effects of weight loss and leptin on skeletal muscle in human subjects. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2011;301:R1259–R1266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Doucet E, St-Pierre S, Alméras N, Després J-P, Bouchard C, Tremblay A. Evidence for the existence of adaptive thermogenesis during weight loss. Br J Nutr. 2001;85:715–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Refalo MC, Nuckols G, Galpin A, Gallagher I, Hamilton DL, Fyfe J. Biological sex differences in absolute and relative changes in muscle size following resistance training in healthy adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. 2024. https://doi.org/10.51224/SRXIV.400.

  36. Nuzzo JL. Sex differences in skeletal muscle fiber types: a meta‐analysis. Clin Anat. 2024;37:81–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Thompson J, Manore MM, Skinner JS. Resting metabolic rate and thermic effect of a meal in low- and adequate-energy intake male endurance athletes. Int J Sport Nutr. 1993;3:194–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Goshozono M, Miura N, Torii S, Taguchi M. Characteristics of non-exercise activity thermogenesis in male collegiate athletes under real-life conditions. Front Sports Act Living. 2024;6:1326890.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Helms ER, Zinn C, Rowlands DS, Naidoo R, Cronin J. High-protein, low-fat, short-term diet results in less stress and fatigue than moderate-protein, moderate-fat diet during weight loss in male weightlifters: a pilot study. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2015;25:163–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all participants for taking part in our study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MFK and ÉD: conceptualization, methodology, data analysis, writing – original draft. MFK, ÉD, and SNY: writing - review & editing. MFK and SNY: design of exercise program. MFK: data collection and analysis. ÉD: supervision, project administration. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript and accepted responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Éric Doucet.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethics committee of the University of Ottawa (H-09-21-6884) approved the study protocol. All participants provided their written consent to participate. This study conformed to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kanaan, M.F., Nait-Yahia, S. & Doucet, É. The effects of high protein intakes during energy restriction on body composition, energy metabolism and physical performance in recreational athletes. Eur J Clin Nutr 79, 544–552 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-025-01585-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-025-01585-2

Search

Quick links