aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
authorJason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>2025-07-02 14:48:22 +0800
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2025-07-04 10:47:41 +0100
commitb9fd9888a5654e59f6c6249337e36c53c1faa329 (patch)
tree8a4909e9746ce39b3f9ebe590e6c4e6da6d2d5b7
parent17bbde2e1716e2ee4b997d476b48ae85c5a47671 (diff)
downloadnet-main.tar.gz
bnxt_en: eliminate the compile warning in bnxt_request_irq due to CONFIG_RFS_ACCELHEADmain
I received a kernel-test-bot report[1] that shows the [-Wunused-but-set-variable] warning. Since the previous commit I made, as the 'Fixes' tag shows, gives users an option to turn on and off the CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL, the issue then can be discovered and reproduced with GCC specifically. Like Simon and Jakub suggested, use fewer #ifdefs which leads to fewer bugs. [1] All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c: In function 'bnxt_request_irq': >> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c:10703:9: warning: variable 'j' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] 10703 | int i, j, rc = 0; | ^ Fixes: 9b6a30febddf ("net: allow rps/rfs related configs to be switched") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202506282102.x1tXt0qz-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c10
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
index ae89a981e052a0..243cb13cb01c7b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
@@ -11607,11 +11607,9 @@ static void bnxt_free_irq(struct bnxt *bp)
static int bnxt_request_irq(struct bnxt *bp)
{
+ struct cpu_rmap *rmap = NULL;
int i, j, rc = 0;
unsigned long flags = 0;
-#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
- struct cpu_rmap *rmap;
-#endif
rc = bnxt_setup_int_mode(bp);
if (rc) {
@@ -11632,15 +11630,15 @@ static int bnxt_request_irq(struct bnxt *bp)
int map_idx = bnxt_cp_num_to_irq_num(bp, i);
struct bnxt_irq *irq = &bp->irq_tbl[map_idx];
-#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
- if (rmap && bp->bnapi[i]->rx_ring) {
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL) &&
+ rmap && bp->bnapi[i]->rx_ring) {
rc = irq_cpu_rmap_add(rmap, irq->vector);
if (rc)
netdev_warn(bp->dev, "failed adding irq rmap for ring %d\n",
j);
j++;
}
-#endif
+
rc = request_irq(irq->vector, irq->handler, flags, irq->name,
bp->bnapi[i]);
if (rc)