Skip to content

issues Search Results · repo:tc39/test262 legacy-regexp language:JavaScript

Filter by

10 results
 (85 ms)

10 results

intc39/test262 (press backspace or delete to remove)

tc39/test262
Extend coverage for RegExp.prototype[Symbol.replace]

Based on findings from #2423: 1. Extend tests coverage for RegExp.prototype[Symbol.replace] 2. Create a feature flag for RegExp.prototype[Symbol.replace] and String.prototype.replace. Not new ...
  • leobalter
  • Opened 
    on Nov 18, 2019
  • #2426

tc39/test262
`Function.prototype.toString` for a built-in function with a name that is invalid as an identifier

... result of Function.prototype.toString for built-in functions with invalid names as identifiers (e.g., RegExp[ $+ ] that is not standardized yet)? Many current implementations produce the following output ...
  • sosukesuzuki
  • 4
  • Opened 
    on Apr 1, 2024
  • #4039

tc39/test262
Let's have exhaustive feature lists!

  • ljharb
  • 9
  • Opened 
    on Sep 14, 2022
  • #3665

tc39/test262
Missing coverage for Legacy RegExp features

coverage
help wanted
  • leobalter
  • 1
  • Opened 
    on Sep 27, 2019
  • #2371

tc39/test262
Add coverage for Legacy RegExp features

coverage
  • leobalter
  • 2
  • Opened 
    on Aug 3, 2017
  • #1165

tc39/test262
Add tests for String.prototype.replaceAll

... for the exception on a non-global RegExp searchValue (but again, we can mostly re-use the existing matchAll tests for that).
  • mathiasbynens
  • 5
  • Opened 
    on Nov 11, 2019
  • #2417

tc39/test262
Negative tests for parsing phase don't seem to actually detect parsing phase

  • mathiasbynens
  • 6
  • Opened 
    on Jul 4, 2018
  • #1621

tc39/test262
Proposal: Additional Metadata for Legacy Extensions

  • jugglinmike
  • 2
  • Opened 
    on Jun 25, 2015
  • #333

tc39/test262
Are there tests against legacy magic properties that are nonconfigurable and nonwritable?

coverage
  • claudepache
  • 4
  • Opened 
    on May 26, 2016
  • #649

tc39/test262
annexB/B.2.1 and B.2.2 fail in node >= 0.11 (0.12, iojs) because 'escape' 'unescape' are non-enumerable

... ]]: true } unless otherwise specified. Regarding, should you implement it...everything is Annex B is something that we wish we could get rid of, but can t because of web legacy compatibility issues ...
  • smikes
  • 8
  • Opened 
    on Feb 16, 2015
  • #158
Issue origami icon

Learn how you can use GitHub Issues to plan and track your work.

Save views for sprints, backlogs, teams, or releases. Rank, sort, and filter issues to suit the occasion. The possibilities are endless.Learn more about GitHub Issues
ProTip! 
Press the
/
key to activate the search input again and adjust your query.
Issue origami icon

Learn how you can use GitHub Issues to plan and track your work.

Save views for sprints, backlogs, teams, or releases. Rank, sort, and filter issues to suit the occasion. The possibilities are endless.Learn more about GitHub Issues
ProTip! 
Restrict your search to the title by using the in:title qualifier.