Abstract
The above discussion has shown that there is a growing need to cope with the past when discussing new operating system concepts including the underlying system architecture. The value of future system architectures will be measured in terms of their ability to support the incremental substitution of existing operating systems by hardware/software elements of the new system structure.
Basic research in operating systems aiming at better modularity, portability, fault tolerance etc. is still considered an area of utmost relevance. However, more applied research projects are needed to systematically study the effects encountered while mapping old systems and interfaces onto new system architectures. A too narrow focus on UNIX may mirror the wrong illusion of a (non-existent) universality of the abstractions defined in today's state-of-the-art distributed OS kernels.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D.R. Brownbridge, L.F. Marshall, B. Randell: The Newcastle Connection or UNIXes of the World Unite!, Software-Practice and Experience Vol. 12, 1147–1162 (1982)
T.L. Borden, J.P. Hennessy, J.W. Rymarczyk: Multiple Operating Systems on One Processor Complex, IBM Systems Journal Vol. 28, 104–123 (1989)
D. Cheriton: The V Distributed System, CACM 31, 314–333 (1988)
P. Domann, V. Meyer, U. Weng-Beckmann: Entwicklungstrends bei UNIX und im Umfeld von UNIX, Teil 1, Informatik-Spektrum 183–194 (1988)
P. Domann, V. Meyer, U. Weng-Beckmann: Entwicklungstrends bei UNIX und im Umfeld von UNIX, Teil 2, Informatik-Spektrum 264–276 (1988)
D. Fauth, J. Gossels, D. Hartman, B. Johnson, R. Kumar, N. Leser, D. Lounsbury, D. Mackey, C. Shue, T. Smith, J. Steiner, W. Tuvell: OSF Distributed Computing Environment Rationale, OSF, Cambridge May 1990
A.N. Habermann, L. Flou, L. Cooprider: Modularization and Hierarchy in a Family of Operating Systems, CACM 19, 266–272 (1976)
M. Kaiserswerth: Verteilte Dateisysteme unter UNIX: Eine Gegenüberstellung verschiedener Lösungen, Informationstechnik it 29, Heft 6, 290–398 (1987)
S.J. Mullender, A.S. Tanenbaum: The Design of a Capbility-Based Distributed Operating System, The Computer Journal, Vol. 29, N. 4, 289–300 (1986)
R. Rashid, D. Julin, D. Orr, R. Sanzi, R. Baron, A. Forin, D. Golub, M. Jones: Mach: A Foundation for System Software, Tech. Report, Dept. of Computer Science, CMU Sept. 1989
M. Rozier, V. Abrossimov, F. Armand, I. Boule, M. Gien, M. Guillemont, F. Herrmann, C. Kaiser, S. Langlois, P. Leonard, W. Neuhauser: CHORUS Distributed Operating Systems, Technical Report CS/TR-88-7.6, Chorus Systems, Nov. 1988
A.S. Tanenbaum, R.v. Renesse: Distributed Operating Systems, ACM Computing Surveys 17, 419–470 (1985)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nehmer, J. (1991). The immortality of operating systems or is research in operating systems still justified?. In: Karshmer, A., Nehmer, J. (eds) Operating Systems of the 90s and Beyond. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 563. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0024528
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0024528
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54987-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46630-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive
Keywords
- System Architecture
- Applied Research Project
- Technology Substitution
- Operating System Kernel
- Utmost Relevance
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.