Skip to main content

Justifying Capital Investments in the Emerging Electric Utility: Accounting for an Uncertain and Changing Industry Structure

  • Chapter
The Virtual Utility

Part of the book series: Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series ((TREP,volume 26))

  • 155 Accesses

  • 3 Citations

Abstract

The electric utility industry faces fundamental and strategic changes in the way electric power is generated, distributed, and sold. Capital budgeting and capital allocation processes in traditional utilities have to be re-organized and changed to move away from an emphasis on asset additions driven by regulatory requirements to reflect opportunities and costs in the uncertain and unstable strategic structure of the new electric utility industry. This paper examines the limitations of traditional capital budgeting practices in justifying capital investments in the emerging electric utility where many of the benefits are strategic, intangible, generally difficult or impossible to assess in terms of cash flows. While there does not seem to be any one best universal procedure, this study develops and recommends the use of an augmented adjusted net present value (ANPV) procedure for capital budgeting in the emerging electric utility.

The author is grateful to John Carroll University and the Mellen Foundation for research support, and to S. Awerbuch, R. Bower, P. Busby, A. Craft, R. Ginn, D. Hagestrom, T. Hoff, C. Moyer, and F. Navratil for useful comments, but remains solely responsible for the contents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerlof, George A. 1970. “The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84 (No. 3, August): 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, Raj. 1980. “Corporate Use of Sophisticated Capital Budgeting Techniques” Interfaces 10 (No. 2, April): 31–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, Raj. 1991. “Management of Accounting Exposure to Currency Changes: Role and Evidence of Agency Costs” Managerial Finance 17 (No. 4): 10–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, Raj. ed. 1993. Capital Budgeting Under Uncertainty. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, Raj and Gyan Chandra. 1990. “Stakeholder Management: Opportunities and Challenges” Business 40 (No. 4, October–November-December): 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, Raj and Charles H. Gibson. 1989. Discounting in Financial Accounting and Reporting. Morris-town, NJ: Financial Executives Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, Raj and Luc Soenen. 1989. “Project Exit Value as a Measure of Flexibility and Risk Exposure” Engineering Economist 35 (No. 1, Fall): 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allais, Maurice and Ole Hagen, eds. 1979. Expected Utility Hypothesis and the Allais Paradox. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Philip W., Kenneth J. Arrow, and David Pines. Eds. 1988. The Economy as an Evolving Complex System. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antle, Rick and Gary Eppen. 1985. “Capital Rationing and Organizational Slack in Capital Budgeting” Management Science 31 (No. 2, February): 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. Brian. 1989. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Events” The Economic Journal 99 (No. 1, March): 116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, Kenneth J. 1982. “Risk Perception in Psychology and Economics” Economic Inquiry 20 (No. 1, January): 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awerbuch, Shimon. 1993. “Measuring the Costs of Photovoltaics in an Electric Utility Planning Framework” Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 1: 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awerbuch, Shimon. 1996. “The Problem of Valuing New Energy Technologies” Energy Policy 24 (No. 2, February): 127–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awerbuch, Shimon, Jesse Dillard, Tom Mouck, and Alistair Preston. 1996. “Capital Budgeting, Technological Innovation and the Emerging Competitive Environment of the Electric Power Industry” Energy Policy 24 (No. 2, February): 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, Warren. 1991. “Valuing Agricultural Firms: An Examination of the Contingent Claims Approach to Pricing Real Assets” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 15 (No. 4, October): 771–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, Carliss Y. 1991. “How Capital Budgeting Deters Innovation - and What to Do About It” Research Technology Management 34 (No. 6, November-December): 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, Carliss Y. 1982. “Optimal Sequential Investment When Capital is Not Readily Reversible” Journal of Finance 37 (No. 3, June): 763–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, Carliss Y. and Kim B. Clark. 1992. “Capabilities and Capital Investment: New Perspectives in Capital Budgeting” Working Paper #92-004, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, Carliss Y. and Richard S. Ruback. 1986. “Inflation, Uncertainty, and Investment” Journal of Finance 41 (No. 3, July): 657–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, David E. 1985. “Disappointment in Decision Making Under Uncertainty” Operations Research 33 (No. 1, January-February): 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergsman, Steve. 1996. “Why Utilities Have the Urge to Merge” Global Finance (No. 2, February): 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Fischer. 1988. “A Simple Discounting Rule” Financial Management 17 (No. 2, Summer): 7–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodmer, Edward and Richard Waldman. 1995. “A Market-Based Approach for Analysis of Utility Decisions” Electricity Journal 8 (No. 3, April): 36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, Laurence. 1991. “The Influence of Production Technology on Risk and Cost of Capital” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 26 (No. 1, March): 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Michael J. and Eduardo S. Schwartz. 1985. “Evaluating Natural Resource Investments” Journal of Business 58 (No. 2, April): 135–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, Bo. 1989 “Flexibility and the Theory of the Firm,” International Journal of Industrial Organization 7 (No. 2, June): 179–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cater, James C. 1995. “Valuing Options for Electric Power Resources” Electricity Journal 8 (No. 3, April): 43–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, Jr., Alfred D. 1990. Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, Alan M. and Edward E. Graham. 1995. “Cross-Border Utility Investments: Translating Investment Risk into Global Advantage” Electricity Journal 8 (No. 5, June): 31–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, Tyler, (ed.). 1988. The Theory of Market Failure. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press and the Cato Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dar, Vinod K. 1995. “Future of the U.S. Electric Utility Industry” Electricity Journal 8 (No. 6, July): 16–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bondt, Werner F. M. and Anil K. Makhija. 1988. “Throwing Good Money After Bad?: Nuclear Power Plant Investment Decisions and the Relevance of Sunk Costs” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 10 (No. 2, September): 173–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demers, Michel. 1991. “Investment Under Uncertainty, Irreversibility and the Arrival of Information Over Time” Review of Economic Studies 58 (No. 2, April): 333–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, Avinash. 1989. “Entry and Exit Decisions under Uncertainty” Journal of Political Economy 97 (No. 3, May): 620–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, Avinash and Barry Nalebuff. 1991. Strategic Thinking. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulman, Scott P. 1989. “The Development of Discounted Cash Flow Techniques in U.S. Industry” Business History Review 63 (No. 3, Autumn): 555–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Ben. 1995. “How Analysts Got Their Sums Wrong” Euromoney (No. 319, November): 58–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, Eugene F. 1980. “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm” Journal of Political Economy 88 (No. 2, April): 288–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, Eugene F. and Michael C. Jensen. 1985. “Organizational Forms and Investment Decisions” Journal of Financial Economics 14 (No. 1, March): 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazzari, Steven, R. Glen Hubbard, and Bruce Petersen. 1988. “Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (No.1, Spring): 141–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, Peter C. 1989. “Foundations of Decision Analysis” Management Science 35 (No. 4, April): 387–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavin, Christopher and Nicholas Lenssen. 1994. “Reshaping the Electric Power Industry” in Lester R. Brown, (ed.), State of the World 1994 (New York, NY: W. W. Norton): 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, Jonathan and Benjamin A. Holden. 1996. “Utility Deregulation in Argentina Presages Possible U.S. Upheaval” Wall Street Journal (June 19): A1, A12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton and Leonard Savage. 1948. “The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk” Journal of Political Economy 56 (No. 4, August): 279–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, Bruce, Joseph Stiglitz, and Andrew Weiss. 1984. “Information Imperfections in the Capital Market and Macroeconomic Fluctuations” American Economic Review 74 (No. 2, May): 194–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grether, David M. and Charles R. Plott. 1979. “Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon” American Economic Review 69 (No. 4, September): 623–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, James M. 1988. “A Test of the Free Cash Flow Hypothesis: Results from the Petroleum Industry” Review of Economic Statistics 70 (No. 1, February): 76–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, Robert H. and David A. Garvin. 1982. “Managing as if Tomorrow Mattered” Harvard Business Review 50 (No. 3, May/June): 70–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckerman, Donald G. 1975. “Motivating Managers to Make Investment Decisions” Journal of Financial Economics 2 (No. 3, September): 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, Thomas E., Howard J. Wenger, and Brian K. Farmer. 1996. “Distributed Generation: An Alternative to Electric Utility Investments in System Capacity” Energy Policy 24 (No. 2, February): 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, James E. 1986. “Evaluation of Manufacturing Investments: A Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Practices,” Financial Management 15 (No. 1, Spring): 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, Bengt and Laurence Weiss. 1985. “Managerial Incentives, Investment, and Aggregate Implications: Scale Effects” Review of Economic Studies 52 (No. 3, July): 403–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holthausen, Robert W. and Robert W. Leftwich. 1983. “The Economic Consequences of Accounting Choice” Journal of Accounting and Economics 5 (No. 2, August): 77–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, George K. and John R. Holland. 1982. “The Economic Value of Flexible Automation” Journal of Manufacturing Systems 1 (No. 2): 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, Jonathan E. and Stephen A. Ross. 1992. “Waiting to Invest: Investment and Uncertainty” Journal of Business 65 (No. 1, January): 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, Holman. 1996. “Electricity Producers Run Screaming From Reality” Wall Street Journal (May 14): A19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Michael C. 1986. “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers” American Economic Review 76 (No. 2, May): 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Michael C. and William Meckling. 1976. “Theory of the Firm, Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure” Journal of Financial Economics 3 (No. 4, October): 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, Alfred E. 1994. “Can Regulation and Competition Coexist? Solutions to the Stranded Cost Problem and Other Conundra” Electricity Journal 7 (No. 8, October): 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, Jayant R. and Thomas H. Noe. 1995. “Dilution Costs, Underinvestment, and Utility Regulation Under Asymmetric Information” Journal of Regulatory Economics 7 (No. 2, March): 177–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Robert S. 1986. “Must CIM be Justified by Faith Alone?” Harvard Business Review (March/April).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Robert S. ed. 1990. Measures for Manufacturing Excellence. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaslow, Thomas W. and Robert S. Pindyck. 1994. “Valuing Flexibility in Utility Planning” Electricity Journal 7 (No. 2, March): 60–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kensinger, John W. 1987. “Adding the Value of Active Management into the Capital Budgeting Equation” Midland Corporate Finance Journal 5 (No. 1, Spring): 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kester, W. Carl. 1984. “Growth Options and Investment: Reducing the Guesswork in Strategic Capital Budgeting” Harvard Business Review 52 (No. 2, March/April): 153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Michael. 1996. “Competition in Network Industries.” Policy Research Working Paper No. 1591, Private Sector Development Department, The World Bank, Washington, DC, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Charles F. 1992. “Emerson Electric: Consistent Profits, Consistently” Harvard Business Review 70 (No. 1, January-February): 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Haim and Marshall Sarnat. 1990. Capital Investment and Financing Decisions. 4th Edition, Engle-wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCrimmon, Kenneth R. and Donald A. Wehrung. 1990. “Characteristics of Risk Taking Executives” Management Science 36 (No. 4, April): 422–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCrimmon, Kenneth R. and Donald A. Wehrung. 1986. Taking Risks: The Management of Uncertainty. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, Mark J. 1989. “Dynamic Consistency and Non-Expected Utility Models of Choice Under Uncertainty” Journal of Economic Literature 27 (No. 4, December): 1622–1668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, Mark J. 1987. “Choices Under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved” Journal of Economic Perspectives 1 (No. 1, Summer): 121–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majd, Saman and Robert S. Pindyck. 1987. “Time to Build, Option Value, and Investment Decisions” Journal of Financial Economics 18 (No. 1, March): 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majd, Saman and Robert S. Pindyck. 1989. “The Learning Curve and Optimal Production Under Uncertainty” Rand Journal of Economics 20 (No. 3, Autumn): 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makovich, Lawrence J. 1995. “Focus on Worth, Not Cost, of Generating Assets” Electrical World 209 (No. 11, November): 46–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, John J. and Chris J. Muscarella. 1985. “Corporate Capital Expenditure Decisions and the Market Value of the Firm” Journal of Financial Economics 14 (No. 3, September): 399–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, Robert and Daniel R. Siegel. 1986. “The Value of Waiting to Invest” Quarterly Journal of Economics 101 (No. 4, November): 707–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, Robert L. and Daniel R. Siegel. 1985. “Investments and the Value of the Firm When There is an Option to Shut Down,” International Economic Review 26 (No. 2, June): 331–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, Paul and John Roberts. 1990. “The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization” American Economic Review (No. 2, June): 511–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, David E. 1988. “Pre-Emptive Investment Timing,” Rand Journal of Economics 19 (No. 1, Spring): 114–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, Stewart C. 1987. “Finance Theory and Financial Strategy,” Midland Corporate Finance Journal 5 (No. 1, Spring): 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, Stewart C. and Nicholas S. Majluf. 1984. “Corporate Financing Decisions When Firms Have Investment Information That Investors Do Not” Journal of Financial Economics 13 (No. 2, June): 187–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, Stewart C. and Stuart M. Turnbull. 1977. “Capital Budgeting and the Capital Asset Pricing Model: Good News and Bad News” Journal of Finance 32 (No. 2, June): 321–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, Peter. 1996. “Electric Utilities: The Argument for Radical Deregulation” Harvard Business Review 64 (No. 1, January/February): 112–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pechman, Carl. 1993. Regulating Power: The Economics of Electricity in the Information Age. Boston: Springer Science+Business Media New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pinches, George E. 1982. “Myopia, Capital Budgeting, and Decision Making” Financial Management 11 (No. 3, Autumn): 6–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, Robert S. 1988. “Irreversible Investment, Capacity Choice, and the Value of the Firm” American Economic Review 78 (No. 5, December): 969–985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, Robert S. 1991. “Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and Investment” Journal of Economic Literature 29 (No. 3, September): 1110–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E. 1992. “Capital Choices: Changing the Way America Invests in Industry” Working Paper, Harvard Business School based on “America’s Investment Famine” The Economist (June 27, 1992): 89–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E. and A. Michael Spence. 1982. “The Capacity Expansion Process in a Growing Oligopoly: The Case of Corn Wet Milling” in John J. McCall, (ed.), The Economics of Information and Uncertainty. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 259–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, R. Burr, Roger P. Bey, David C. Lewis. 1975. “The Development of a Mean- Semivariance Approach to Capital Budgeting” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 10 (No. 4, November): 639–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, G. David and John C. Winginton. 1981. Analyzing Capital Expenditures: Private and Public Perspectives. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmusen, Eric. 1989. Games and Information. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, John. 1987. “Battles for Market Share: Incomplete Information, Aggressive Strategic Planning and Competitive Dynamics,” chapter 4 of Truman F. Bewley, (ed.), Advances in Economic Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 157–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Kevin and Martin L. Weitzman. 1981. “Funding Criteria for Research, Development, and Exploration Projects” Econometrica 49 (No. 5, September): 1261–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharfstein, David S. and Jeremy C. Stein. 1990. “Herd Behavior and Investment” American Economic Review 80 (No. 3, June): 465–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, Andrei and Robert W. Vishny. 1989. “Management Entrenchment: The Case of Manager-Specific Investments” Journal of Financial Economics 25 (No. 1, November): 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, Daniel R., James L. Smith and James L. Paddock. 1987. “Valuing Offshore Oil Properties with Options Pricing Models,” Midland Corporate Finance Journal 5 (No. 1, Spring): 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A. Michael. 1981. “The Learning Curve and Competition” Bell Journal of Economics 12 (No. 1, Spring): 49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A. Michael. 1983. “Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure: A Review Article” Journal of Economic Literature 21 (No. 3, September): 981–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalon, Charles G. 1992. “Restructuring the Electric Industry” Resources and Energy 14 (Nos. 1–2, April): 55–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statman, Meir. 1982. “The Persistence of the Payback Method: A Principal-Agent Perspective” Engineering Economist 27 (No. 2, Winter): 95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statman, Meir and David Caldwell. 1987, “Applying Behavioral Finance to Capital Budgeting: Project Terminations” Financial Management 16 (No. 4, Winter): 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, Rodney. 1982, “Institutional Objectives, Structural Barriers, and Deregulation of the Electric Utility Industry” Journal of Economic Issues 17 (No. 2, June): 443–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, Philip. 1996. “The Dangers of Deregulation” Financial Times (March 30), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, Jeremy C. 1989. “Efficient Capital Markets, Inefficient Firms: A Model of Myopic Corporate Behavior” Quarterly Journal of Economics 104 (November): 655–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirling, Andrew. 1994. “Diversity and Ignorance in Electric Supply Investment” Energy Policy 22, pp. 195–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong, John S. and John R. Meyer. 1990. “Sustaining Investment, Discretionary Investment, and Valuation: A Residual Funds Study of the Paper Industry” in R. Glenn Hubbard, (Ed.), Asymmetric Information, Corporate Finance and Investment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 127–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stulz, Rene M. 1990. “Managerial Discretion and Optimal Financing Policies” Journal of Financial Economics 26 (No. 1, July): 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, Robert A. 1987. “Allocating Capital Among a Firm’s Divisions: Hurdle Rates vs. Budgets” Journal of Financial Research 10 (No. 3, Fall): 177–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tardiff, Timothy J. and Miles O. Bidwell. 1990. “Evaluating a Public Utility’s Investments: Cash Flow vs. Revenue Requirements” Public Utilities Fortnightly (May 10): 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teisberg, Elizabeth Olmsted. 1993. “Capital Investment Strategies Under Uncertain Regulation” RAND Journal of Economics 24 (No. 4, Winter): 591–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakor, Anjan. 1990. “Investment Myopia and the Inter Organization of Capital Allocation Decisions” Journal of Law and Organization 6 (No. 1, Spring): 129–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, Richard H. 1991. The Winner’s Curse: Paradoxes and Anomalies of Economic Life. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, Richard H. and Eric J. Johnson. 1990. “Gambling With the House Money and Trying to Break Even: The Effects of Prior Outcomes on Risky Choice” Management Science 36 (No. 6, June): 643–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triantis, Alexander J. and James E. Hodder. 1990. “Valuing Flexibility as a Complex Option” Journal of Finance 45 (No. 2, June): 549–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis, Lenos. 1996. Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis, Lenos and Scott P. Mason. 1987. “Valuing Managerial Flexibility” Midland Corporate Finance Journal 5 (No. 1, Spring): 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman. 1986. “Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions” Journal of Business 59 (No. 4, Part 2, October): 251–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver. 1981. “The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, and Attributes” Journal of Economic Literature 19 (No. 4, December): 1537–1568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, Tim. 1994. “Retail Competition in the Electric Industry: Lessons from the United Kingdom” Electricity Journal 7 (No. 5, June): 56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aggarwal, R. (1997). Justifying Capital Investments in the Emerging Electric Utility: Accounting for an Uncertain and Changing Industry Structure. In: Awerbuch, S., Preston, A. (eds) The Virtual Utility. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series, vol 26. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6167-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6167-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7827-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-6167-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Publish with us

Policies and ethics