Managing Risk Using Renewable Energy Technologies

• Awerbuch, Shimon, 1995. “Market-based IRP: It’s Easy!!!” The Electricity Journal 8(3): 50–67.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brathwaite, Leon, and J. Gopal, 1992. “Fuel Diversity Analysis,” Analysis prepared for the 1992 Electricity Report in California, California Energy Commission.

  Google Scholar 

• Cadogan, John B., et. al., 1992. “The Risks of Conventional Utility Supply Sources and the Rewards of Renewable Energy,” Windpower 1992, Seattle, WA, 101–111.

  Google Scholar 

• Cater, James C, 1995. “Valuing Options for Electric Power Resources,” The Electricity Journal 8(3): 43–49.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dixit, Avinash K., and Robert S. Pindyck, 1994. Investment Under Uncertainty, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Duffle, Darrell, 1992. Dynamic Asset Pricing Theory, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Hamrin, Jan, and Nancy Rader, 1994. Affected with the Public Interest: Electric Utility Restructuring in an Era of Competition, National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners.

  Google Scholar 

• Hoff, Thomas E., Howard J., Wenger, and Brian K. Farmer, 1996. “Distributed Generation: An Alternative to Electric Utility Investments in System Capacity,” Energy Policy, vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 137–147.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hoff, Thomas E., 1997. Integrating Renewable Energy Technologies in the Electric Utility Industry: A Risk Management Approach, forthcoming from National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Hyman, Leonard S., 1994. America’s Electric Utilities: Past, Present and Future, 5 edition, Arlington Virginia: Public Utilities Reports, Inc.

  Google Scholar 

• Jacobs, Jonathan M., and Thomas E. Huntley, 1992. “Valuation of Fuel Diversity,” Testimony in California Energy Commission 1992 Electricity Report Proceeding, Docket No. 90-ER-92.

  Google Scholar 

• Jones, Scott T., and Frank A. Felder, 1994. “Using Derivatives in Real Decisionmaking,” Public Utilities Fortnightly 132(19): 18–21, 25.

  Google Scholar 

• Kenetech, 1993 and 1994. Annual Report.

  Google Scholar 

• Kolbe, Lawrence, and William B. Tye, 1995. “The Cost of Capital Does Not Compensate for Stranded-Cost Risk,” Public Utilities Fortnightly 133(10): 26–28.

  Google Scholar 

• Lively, Mark B., 1994. “Electric Transmission Pricing: Are Long-Term Contracts Really Futures Contracts?,” Public Utilities Fortnightly 132(19): 29–32.

  Google Scholar 

• Logan, Douglas M., et. al., 1995. “Integrated Resource Planning with Renewable Resources,” The Electricity Journal 8(3): 56–66.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Morris, Peter A, et. al., 1993. “Value of Flexibility and Modularity of Distributed Generation Technologies: Photovoltaics at PG&E’s Kerman Substation—EPRI Investment Strategies Project,” EPRI Report (September).

  Google Scholar 

• Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, 1994. Annual Report.

  Google Scholar 

• Orans, Ren, et. al., 1992. Targeting DSM for Transmission and Distribution Benefits: A Case Study of PG&E’s Delta District. Research Report TR-100487, Palo Alto, California: Electric Power Research Institute.

  Google Scholar 

• Pacific Gas and Electric Company, 1989 through 1994. Annual Report.

  Google Scholar 

• Price, Snuller, Bill Clauhs, and John Bustard, 1995. “Profitability and Risk Assessment of T&D Capital Expansion Plans,” Distributed Resources 1995: EPRI’s First Annual Distributed Resources Conference, Kansas City, Missouri (August).

  Google Scholar 

• Real Goods, 1993. Catalog (Summer).

  Google Scholar 

• Ross, Sheldon, 1988. A First Course in Probability, 3edition, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

  Google Scholar 

• Southern California Edison, Annual Report (1994).

  Google Scholar 

• Swezey, Blair G., and Yih-huei Wan, 1995. “The True Cost of Renewables,” Solar Today 9(6): 30–32.

  Google Scholar 

• Weinberg, Carl J., Joseph J. Iannucci, and Melissa M. Reading, 1991. “The Distributed Utility: Technology, Customer, and Public Policy Changes Shaping the Electrical Utility of Tomorrow.” Energy Systems and Policy 15(4): 307–322.

  Google Scholar 

Download references