From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] docs: netdev: recommend against --in-reply-to
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 08:49:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230823154922.1162644-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
It's somewhat unfortunate but with (my?) the current tooling
if people post new versions of a set in reply to an old version
managing the review queue gets difficult. So recommend against it.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst b/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
index 2ab843cde830..c1c732e9748b 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
@@ -167,6 +167,8 @@ Asking the maintainer for status updates on your
patch is a good way to ensure your patch is ignored or pushed to the
bottom of the priority list.
+.. _Changes requested:
+
Changes requested
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
@@ -359,6 +361,10 @@ Make sure you address all the feedback in your new posting. Do not post a new
version of the code if the discussion about the previous version is still
ongoing, unless directly instructed by a reviewer.
+The new version of patches should be posted as a separate thread,
+not as a reply to the previous posting. Change log should include a link
+to the previous posting (see :ref:`Changes requested`).
+
Testing
-------
--
2.41.0
next reply other threads:[~2023-08-23 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-23 15:49 Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-08-23 20:38 ` [PATCH net-next] docs: netdev: recommend against --in-reply-to Przemek Kitszel
2023-08-23 20:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Przemek Kitszel
2023-08-24 9:08 ` Martin Habets
2023-08-24 15:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-30 21:10 ` Jacob Keller
2023-08-24 18:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230823154922.1162644-1-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.