From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	 Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
	 Joel Granados <joel.granados@kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] acct(2): begin the deprecation of legacy BSD process accounting
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2026 09:38:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260106-bsd-acct-v1-1-d15564b52c83@kernel.org> (raw)

As Christian points out [1], even though it's privileged, this interface
has a lot of footguns. There are better options these days (e.g. eBPF),
so it would be good to start discouraging its use and mark it as
deprecated.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20250212-giert-spannend-8893f1eaba7d@brauner/

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
---
I meant to send this months ago, but never got around to it. Let's at
least mark this as deprecated and see who complains. We could also
consider adding a pr_warn_once() that fires the first time someone calls
acct(2) if we want to kill this in a more near-term timeframe.
---
 init/Kconfig | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index fa79feb8fe57bb01d8ce8f35e33535709b57d452..160c1c4ef253593d62650cd5a53f3421bc9372d3 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -624,8 +624,9 @@ config SCHED_HW_PRESSURE
 	  arch_update_hw_pressure() and arch_scale_thermal_pressure().
 
 config BSD_PROCESS_ACCT
-	bool "BSD Process Accounting"
+	bool "BSD Process Accounting (DEPRECATED)"
 	depends on MULTIUSER
+	default n
 	help
 	  If you say Y here, a user level program will be able to instruct the
 	  kernel (via a special system call) to write process accounting
@@ -635,7 +636,9 @@ config BSD_PROCESS_ACCT
 	  command name, memory usage, controlling terminal etc. (the complete
 	  list is in the struct acct in <file:include/linux/acct.h>).  It is
 	  up to the user level program to do useful things with this
-	  information.  This is generally a good idea, so say Y.
+	  information.  This mechanism is antiquated and has significant
+	  scalability issues.  You probably want to use eBPF instead.  Say
+	  N unless you really need this.
 
 config BSD_PROCESS_ACCT_V3
 	bool "BSD Process Accounting version 3 file format"

---
base-commit: 7f98ab9da046865d57c102fd3ca9669a29845f67
change-id: 20260106-bsd-acct-c60be8e6ae62

Best regards,
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

next             reply	other threads:[~2026-01-06 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-06 14:38 Jeff Layton [this message]
2026-01-12 10:06 ` [PATCH] acct(2): begin the deprecation of legacy BSD process accounting Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260106-bsd-acct-v1-1-d15564b52c83@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=joel.granados@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.