Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Jul;10(7):464-9.
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70097-9.

Risk of resistance to highly active antiretroviral therapy among HIV-positive injecting drug users: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Risk of resistance to highly active antiretroviral therapy among HIV-positive injecting drug users: a meta-analysis

Daniel Werb et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

Although highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is an effective treatment for HIV, many physicians withhold this treatment from HIV-positive injecting drug users (IDUs) because of fears of non-adherence and consequent development of antiretroviral resistance. Little is known, however, about whether the rates of resistance differ between IDUs and non-IDUs. We did a meta-analysis of studies that compared antiretroviral resistance rates in IDUs (current or previous) with those in HIV-positive patients infected by other routes and who had never injected drugs. We used a random-effects model to investigate overall resistance rates and resistance to individual drug classes. Of 181 potential studies, 27 were eligible for review. We were able to extract data from 14 studies, but two were excluded because of a very small sample size of IDUs or data being available only from a secondary analysis. Thus we included 12 studies in the meta-analysis, involving 9055 patients, of which 2054 (23%) were IDUs. The risk of development of antiretroviral resistance did not differ significantly between IDU and non-IDU (odds ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.74-1.45, p=0.84). Rates of loss to follow-up and virological failure were similar in IDU and non-IDU samples. Existing evidence does not support the common practice of withholding antiretroviral therapy from HIV-positive IDU on the basis of an elevated risk of antiretroviral resistance. Therapeutic guidelines should consider reassessment of this issue.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DW and EW declare that they have no conflicts of interest. EM has received grants and served as an ad hoc advisor to Pfizer, and JM has received grants from, served as an ad hoc adviser to, or spoken at events sponsored by Abbott, Argos Therapeutics, Bioject, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen-Ortho, Merck Frosst, Merck Serono, Panacos, Pfizer, Schering, TheraTechnologies, Tibotec, and Trimeris Inc.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Study selection process
HAART=highly active antiretroviral therapy. IDU=injecting drug users.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Pooled odds ratio of resistance to HAART among HIV-positive IDUs and non-IDUs
HAART=highly active antiretroviral therapy. IDU=injecting drug users. OR=odds ratio.

References

    1. Mathers BM, Degenhardt L, Phillips B, et al. Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. Lancet 2008; 372: 1733–45. - PubMed
    1. Wolfe D, Malinowska-Sempruch K. Illicit drug policies and the global HIV epidemic: effects of UN and national government approaches. New York: Open Society Institute, 2004.
    1. Hogg R, Cahn P, Katabira ET, et al. Time to act: global apathy towards HIV/AIDS is a crime against humanity. The Lancet 2002; 360: 1710–11. - PubMed
    1. Wood E, Kerr T, Tyndall MW, Montaner JS. A review of barriers and facilitators of HIV treatment among injection drug users. AIDS 2008; 22: 1247–56. - PubMed
    1. Jha CK, Madison J. Disparity in health care: HIV, stigma, and marginalization in Nepal. J Int AIDS Soc 2009; 12: 16. - PMC - PubMed

Substances