Why The Polyvagal Theory Is Untenable: An international expert evaluation of the polyvagal theory and commentary upon Porges, S.W. (2025). Polyvagal theory: current status, clinical applications, and future directions. Clin. Neuropsychiatry, 22(3), 169-184
- PMID: 41768017
- PMCID: PMC12937499
- DOI: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20260110
Why The Polyvagal Theory Is Untenable: An international expert evaluation of the polyvagal theory and commentary upon Porges, S.W. (2025). Polyvagal theory: current status, clinical applications, and future directions. Clin. Neuropsychiatry, 22(3), 169-184
Abstract
Thirty-nine highly acknowledged experts in the areas of the physiology and the evolution of the vagus nerve and of vertebrate social behavior (many whose works have been cited in the polyvagal theory [PVT] literature as supporting the theory) were invited by the first author to participate as co-authors of this article. They were asked to evaluate the PVT and comment upon an overview of the theory written by its author (Porges, 2025a). All those invited, save one, accepted and co-authored the paper. The dissenting scholar was "unfamiliar with the PVT." This article specifically appraises--based upon the current state of knowledge of autonomic function and vertebrate evolution--several major elements of the PVT, as described in Porges (2025a) and elsewhere. These include: 1) the validity of PVT assumptions that respiratory sinus arrhythmia is a direct measure of the extent of central vagal drive to the heart; 2) PVT characterizations regarding the neuroanatomy and functions of two major brainstem vagal nuclei, the ventrally situated Nucleus Ambiguus and the Dorsal Motor Nucleus of the vagus nerve; 3) PVT assertions regarding the evolution of the vagus nerve; 4) PVT claims about the specificity of mammalian social behavior in relation to nonmammalian vertebrates, and 5) PVT interpretations of earlier seminal physiological literature. All co-authors agree that major tenets of the PVT are not supported by past or current knowledge and, in several instances, are inconsistent with the broader evidence base. Since the topics addressed constitute fundamental premises of the PVT, we conclude that the PVT is untenable, because it is not defensible based on existing neurophysiological and evolutionary evidence. The psychological elements composing the superstructure of the PVT are primarily derived from earlier psychological literature and are neither clarified nor strengthened by PVT constructs that lack evidence. This article does not intend to address alternative explanations about relations between vagal function and psychological processes, although such explanations do exist.
Keywords: autonomic nervous system; parasympathetic; polyvagal; respiratory heart-rate variability; respiratory sinus arrhythmia; vagus nerve.
© 2026 Giovanni Fioriti Editore s.r.l.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None.
Figures
References
-
- Alen, N. V., Shields, G. S., Nemer, A., D’Souza, I. A., Ohlgart, M., & Hostinar, C. E. (2022). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between parenting and child autonomic nervous system activity. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Article 104734. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104734 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Babák, E. (1913). Über die Kehl-und Lungenatembewegungen der Amphibien und ihre Regulation. Pflüger's Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere, 154(1), 66–139.
-
- Barrett, D. J., & Taylor, E. W. (1985a). Spontaneous efferent activity in branches of the vagus nerve controlling heart rate and ventilation in the dogfish. Journal of Experimental Biology, 117, 433–448. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous