Skip to main content

Questions tagged [compatibility]

For questions regarding compatibility of retrocomputers and peripherals.

-3 votes
1 answer
368 views

There are several PS/2 mice with an 800/1000 DPI optical sensor, three buttons, and a scroll-wheel. Several modern motherboards have a PS/2 port, such as the MSI Pro B650M-P, ASUS Prime H610M-A, ...
138 Aspen's user avatar
  • 105
10 votes
2 answers
800 views

I remember using high-density disks at a pinch with an Amiga 500 back in the day, after my friend's mum couldn't get a pack of double-density media. We would tape over the HD hole (possibly ...
screwtop's user avatar
  • 229
2 votes
0 answers
276 views

What is the last version of LibreOffice compatible with Windows7 32bits? I don't mind about the official release or an unofficial fork. Other software alternatives are welcome too
Daniel Perez's user avatar
32 votes
5 answers
5k views

Windows NT implemented POSIX compatibility because some US government contracts required such. It is said that the POSIX implementation was only pro forma, not intended or suitable for real use (i.e. ...
rwallace's user avatar
  • 65.3k
3 votes
1 answer
350 views

While the majority of DEC's PDP-11 systems used UNIBUS or QBUS based peripherals for storage, some of the larger PDP-11s, along with larger machines such as the DECsystem 20 and the VAX-11/780 used ...
Xav101's user avatar
  • 51
198 votes
1 answer
56k views

I installed Windows NT 3.1 on a Compaq ProSignia 3080 system, because of several reasons: I know that this machine was running Windows NT 3.1 when it was in productive use. And I think this machine ...
Michael Karcher's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
563 views

If I recall, PAGE = &E00 for a BBC Model B system with cassette tape based storage. On installation of Acorn DFS ROM (with 8271 Floppy disc controller), the ROM allocated more memory, increasing ...
therobyouknow's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
427 views

I am in possession of a working 1986 Compaq Portable II. However, I couldn't find a 5.25" floppy with the proper version of DOS on it to actually make the computer, ya know, work. I've since ...
R3TURN-0's user avatar
10 votes
1 answer
1k views

The Harris company, well known for being an early second source making x86 chips under license, eventually produced a fully static CMOS 80C286 of their own design (later known as the Intersil 80C286 ...
fuz's user avatar
  • 1,614
8 votes
1 answer
463 views

Do I remember correctly about an unofficial but popular test of "PC compatibility" in the early 1980s? Basically if a machine could run vanilla versions of both Lotus 1-2-3 and Microsoft ...
RichF's user avatar
  • 9,616
12 votes
3 answers
2k views

When the IBM PC was released, it did not take long for people to figure out that there would be a big market for compatible machines. The first wave relied on MS-DOS as the compatibility layer. The ...
rwallace's user avatar
  • 65.3k
9 votes
2 answers
791 views

Most times whene I call EDIT on my XT-class machine with MS-DOS 5.0 installed on the hard disk, the menus of EDIT appear, but the window that should contain the file contents stays blank and the ...
Michael Karcher's user avatar
17 votes
2 answers
3k views

It is well known that the PlayStation 2 implemented compatibility with the previous console by essentially incorporating a PS1 on a chip. The fact of backward compatibility is unremarkable as far as ...
rwallace's user avatar
  • 65.3k
-1 votes
1 answer
150 views

I put together a retro gaming setup with a 2000ish spec (can post specs if required) and it's come together pretty nicely except the CPU fan is insanely shrill (it's a Coolermaster something). If I ...
Sam's user avatar
  • 421
17 votes
6 answers
2k views

I never was into CP/M, but I knew it was very popular and the amount of software out there was significant. That being said, when you looked beyond the Kaypros, the IMSAIs, the SOLs and the like which ...
bjb's user avatar
  • 19.2k

15 30 50 per page