COLLECTED BY
Organization:
Internet Archive
The Internet Archive discovers and captures web pages through many different web crawls.
At any given time several distinct crawls are running, some for months, and some every day or longer.
View the web archive through the
Wayback Machine.
Content crawled via the
Wayback Machine Live Proxy mostly by the Save Page Now feature on web.archive.org.
Liveweb proxy is a component of Internet Archive?s wayback machine project. The liveweb proxy captures the content of a web page in real time, archives it into a ARC or WARC file and returns the ARC/WARC record back to the wayback machine to process. The recorded ARC/WARC file becomes part of the wayback machine in due course of time.
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20170621004048/https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2014-July/026953.html
[OpenWrt-Devel] uClibc-ng
Waldemar Brodkorb
wbx at uclibc-ng.org
Mon Jul 21 21:23:49 CEST 2014
Hi Florian,
Florian Fainelli wrote,
> Hello,
>
> (adding uclibc and Bernhard)
>
> 2014-07-20 12:13 GMT-07:00 Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx at uclibc-ng.org>:
> > Hello Embedded Linux Hackers,
> >
> > it seems there is no plan to release a new uClibc version.
> > The current maintainer does not response on any public or private mails
> > about a plan to do a needed release. Therefore most of you carrying a lot
> > of patches against uClibc 0.9.33.2 to make it work in your project.
> > A really ugly situation.
>
> Although I do welcome your action, and stepping in to offer a solution
> to this, I feel like forking might have the potential of making this
> situation worse, including, but not limited to:
>
> - creating confusion between uclibc and uclibc-ng
What kind of confusion. uClibc-ng frontpage clearly states it is a
spin-off of uClibc.
> - pissing off Bernhard
May be I am already pissed off by him? In the past I send a patch
for mips64 n64 with no answer. After a ping a month later it got
applied. A bug report about broken sparc support never got a
response. Public mails of the buildroot project missing a release
got ignored. A private mail from me to Eric and Bernhard, response
from Eric that he is no longer involved, no answer from Bernhard.
So the selective answers of Bernhard are a problem, at least for me.
> - duplicating existing infrastructure instead of gaining access to it
I asked Bernhard if he wants to give up maintainership.
> - what if you end up in the same situation as uClibc, we all have busy lives?
So what is the situation of uClibc? The problem is lack of
communication. I would be fine if Bernhard would answer any mails
regarding non-technical issues with uClibc. A short mail "I am busy,
no release this year." would be at least a fair statement.
Or "I am very busy, having a new job, can someone make a release?"
> Thomas and I talked to Khem Raj about this uClibc situation during ELC
> back in June, and Khem offered some help to see if we could:
>
> - make Bernhard aware of the lack of release situation
> - use his uclibc.org access to facilitate a 0.9.34? release
Nothing happened. Should I whine another year on the mailinglist
about a new release?
As an old OpenBSD user I am following:
Shutup and hack!
best regards
Waldemar
More information about the openwrt-devel
mailing list