The expansion of Setaria farmers in East Asia

visibility

3.9K

views

Abstract

AI generated

The research explores the linguistic connections between the Sino-Tibetan and Austronesian languages, proposing a new macrophylum labeled STAN that arises from agricultural expansions in East Asia, particularly centered around rice and foxtail millet cultivation. The study draws on archaeological findings and vocabulary comparisons to support the hypothesis of a shared linguistic heritage linked to early rice-farming societies in the Yangzi valley.

Key takeaways

AI generated

The STAN hypothesis posits a linguistic macrophylum linking Sino-Tibetan and Austronesian languages through agriculture.
Domestication of rice and foxtail millet occurred around 8500-9000 bp, pre-dating the formation of language families.
Five recognized language families in East Asia have estimated time depths ranging from 2500 to 7000 bp.
Foxtail millet's geographical distribution aligns with early STAN-speaking populations in north China.
Neolithic transitions for rice and Setaria suggest independent agricultural developments in northern and southern China.

FAQ's

AI generated

What evidence supports the farming/language dispersal hypothesis in East Asia?add

The study finds that the domestication of rice and foxtail millet correlates with the formation of major East Asian language families, indicating agricultural expansion influenced linguistic diversification.

How did archaeological findings confirm early rice and millet cultivation?add

Sites like Jiăhú and Nan-Kuan-Li reveal rice dating back 8500 bp and concurrent millet findings around 4500-5000 bp, supporting the connection between agriculture and linguistic development.

What relationship exists between the STAN macrophylum and foxtail millet?add

The research shows that at least 12% shared vocabulary links Sino-Tibetan and Austronesian languages to foxtail millet, suggesting linguistic connections evolved alongside agricultural practices.

How does the domestication of rice vary between Oryza indica and japonica?add

Genetic divergence analyses indicate Oryza indica and japonica underwent independent domestication events approximately 440,000 and 86,000-200,000 years ago, respectively, underscoring their distinct developmental paths.

What implications arise for linguistic taxonomy from the STAN hypothesis?add

The findings imply the STAN macrophylum's expansion was tied to early rice-and-millet farming, suggesting a more complex relationship between language evolution and agrarian societies than previously assumed.

Figures

Table sh Examples of sound correspondences

It can be supposed that the eastern seaboard farmers, who continued to rely on hunting and gathering to supplement their diet, began to specialize in the direction of their new ‘wet’ environment and to acquire elements of a way of life based on a combination of coastal foraging, hunting and sea fishing with rice and foxtail millet agriculture, which characterizes the early Austronesians.'° With these skills, these groups found coastal environments particularly attractive, and they started expanding southward along the China coast.

ble 5. vA The numerals from five to ten in Formosan and PMP Sources: Amis: Wu (2000); Atayal: Egerod (1980); Bunun: Zeitoun (2000a); Favorlang=Babuza: Ferrell (1969); Hoanya: Ferrell (1969), supplemented with Ino (1998); Kanakanabu: Ogawa and Asai (1935), as cited in Ferrell (1969); Ketagalan-Basai: Tsuchida, Yamada and Moriguchi (1991); Luilang: Ferrell (1969); Paiwan: Ferrell (1982); Papora: Ferrell (1969), supplemented with Ino (1998); Pazeh: Liand Tsuchida (2001); Puyuma: Huang (2000); Rukai: Zeitoun (2000b); Saaroa: Tsuchida, as cited in Ferrell 1969; Saisiat: Ino (1998 for Saitaoyak dialect); Sediq: Pecoraro (1977), Siraya: Ferrell (1969); Taokas: Ferrell (1969), supplemented with Ino (1998); Thao: Blust (2003); Tsou: Tung (1964).

Figure 5.3 Nested isoglosses for the numerals ‘5’ to ‘10’ in Formosan languages.

2 sf Disyllabic AN words in Buyang (4uUl, 2UUT, LUV A) The evidence that TK is a subgroup within AN, and specifically a member of the Puluqic taxon, is that it has all six innovative numerals (Sagart 2004). The conclusion inescapably follows that, like PMP, Tai-Kadai has its origin in a Puluqic language of south or south-eastern Taiwan. Further, TgéKadai shares with PMP a form relatable to the 2sg pronoun *-mu (Sagart 2001), suggesting that TK and PMP belong the same subgroup within Puluqic. A scenario describing the events leading to the formation of PTK might run as follows: in the second half of the 3rd millennium Bce a group of speakers of a Pulugic dialect (“FATK’, Formosan Ancestor of Tai-Kadai) left eastern Taiwan by boat in search of new agricultural land. They found it on the coast between the Red River delta in north Vietnam and the Pearl River delta in the present-day Guangdong province of China. In that region they eventually came into intimate contact with, and underwent strong pressure from, a population of mainland farmers speaking a language whose affiliation is difficult to establish,'® but with possible phylic or macrophylic connections to Austroasiatic. An intense episode of contact resulted in FATK being partially relexified by this donor language, with only the most basic lexical items resisting displacement. PTK was the result of this interaction: it is at the core an AN language, partially relexified by an extinct language. A sc, OUR hi ne Oe ee ae | a. a a a ca So Yo a nn ee ne’ ay fa ie

Last updatedOctober 11, 2025

1 of 25

Download research papers for free!

References (78)

Bellwood, P. (2001) 'Early agriculturalist population diasporas? Farming, languages and genes', Annual Review of Anthropology, 30: 181-207.

Bellwood, P. (2005) 'Examining the farming/language hypothesis in the East Asian context', in L. Sagart, R.M. Blench and A. Sanchez-Mazas (eds) The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics, pp. 17-30, London: RoutledgeCurzon.

Bellwood, P. and Renfrew, C. (2003) 'Farmers, foragers, languages, genes: the genesis of agricultural societies', in P. Bellwood and C. Renfrew (eds) Examining the Farming/ Language Dispersal Hypothesis, pp. 17-28, Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

Benedict, P.K. (1942) 'Thai, Kadai and Indonesian: a new alignment in Southeastern Asia', American Anthropologist, nS 44: 576-601.

Benedict, P.K. (1975) Austro-Thai: Language and Culture, New Haven, CT: HRAF Press.

Benedict, P.K. (1972) Sino-Tibetan: A Conspectus, Cambridge: University Printing House.

Blust, R.A. (1977) 'The Proto-Austronesian pronouns and Austronesian subgrouping: a preliminary report', University of Hawai'i Working Papers in Linguistics, 9(2): 1-15.

Blust, R.A. (1980) 'Austronesian etymologies', Oceanic Linguistics, 19: 1-181.

Blust, R. (1988) 'The Austronesian homeland: a linguistic perspective', Asian Perspectives XXVI, 1: 45-67.

Blust, R.A. (1995a) 'An Austronesianist looks at Sino-Austronesian', in W.S.-Y. Wang (ed.) The Ancestry of the Chinese Language, Journal of Chinese Linguistics monograph series, 8: 283-98.

Blust, R.A. (1995b) 'Sibilant assimilation in Formosan languages and the Proto- Austronesian word for "nine" ', Oceanic Linguistics, 34: 443-53.

Blust, R.A. (1996) 'The Prehistory of the Austronesian-speaking peoples: a view from language', Journal of World Prehistory, 9: 453-510.

Blust, R.A. (1999) 'Notes on Pazeh phonology and morphology', Oceanic Linguistics, 38: 321-65.

Blust, R.A. (2003) Thao Dictionary, Nankang: Institute of Linguistics (Preparatory Office), Academia Sinica.

Chang Kwang-chih (1986) The Archaeology of Ancient China, 4th edn, New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.

Chang Kwang-chih (1987) 'zhōngguó Dōngnán hăi'ān kăogŭ yŭ nándăo yŭzŭ qĭyuán wèntí' (The archaeology of the southeast coast of China and the question of Austronesian origins), Nánfāng Mínzú Kăogŭ, 1: 1-14.

Chang Kwang-chih (1989) 'Xīn Shíqí shídài de Táiwān Hăixiá' (The Taiwan Straits in Neolithic times), Kaogu, 261: 241-50.

Diffloth, G. (1994) 'The lexical evidence for Austric, so far', Oceanic Linguistics, 33(1): 309-22.

Diffloth, G. (2005) 'The contribution of linguistic palaeontology to the homeland of Austroasiatic', in L. Sagart, R.M Blench and A. Sanchez-Mazas (eds) The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics, pp. 77-89, London: RoutledgeCurzon.

Doré, H. (1926) Manuel des superstitions chinoises, Shanghai: Imprimerie de la Mission Catholique à l'orphelinat de T'ou-sè-wè.

Egerod, S. (1980) Atayal-English Dictionary (Scandinavian Institute of Asian Studies, monograph 35), London and Malmø: Curzon Press.

Ferrell, R. (1969) Taiwan Aboriginal Groups: Problems in Cultural and Linguistic Classification (Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica, monograph 17), Nankang: Academia Sinica.

Ferrell, R. (1982) Paiwan Dictionary, Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.

Fu Daxiong (2001) 'Xizang Changguogou yizhi xin shiqi shidai nongzuowu yicun de faxian, jianding he yanjiu', [ENGLISH TRANSLATION PLEASE] Kaogu, 3: 66- 74.

Garris, A.J., Tai, T.H., Coburn, J., Kresovich, S. and McCouch, S. (2005) 'Genetic structure and diversity in Oryza sativa L.', Genetics, 169(3): 1631-8.

Han, K.X. and Nakahashi, T. (1996) 'A comparative study of ritual tooth ablation in ancient China and Japan', Anthropological Science, 104: 43-64.

Harvey, M. (1979) 'Subgroups in Austronesian', BA honours thesis, Canberra, Australian National University.

Harvey, M. (1982) 'Subgroups in Austronesian', in A. Halim, L. Carrington and S.A. Wurm (eds) Papers from the Third International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, vol. 2, Tracking the Travellers, pp. 47-99, Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.

Higham, C. (1996) The Bronze Age of Southeast Asia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Higham, C. and Lu, T. (1998) 'The origins and dispersal of rice cultivation', Antiquity, 72: 867-77.

Hu, Y., Ambrose, S.H. and Wang, C. (2006) 'Stable isotopic analysis of human bones from Jiahu site, Henan, China: Implications for the transition to agriculture', Journal of Archaeological Science, 33(9): 1319-30.

Huáng B. (1992) Zàng-Miăn Yŭzŭ Yŭyán Cíhuì (A Tibeto-Burman Lexicon), Beijing: Zhōngyāng Mínzú Xuéyuàn Chūbănshè.

Huang, Lillian (2000) Bēinán yŭ cānkăo yŭfă (A Reference Grammar of Puyuma), Taipei: Yuanliu.

Ino, Y. (1998) 'Xún Tái Rì Chéng' (Journal of a journey in Taiwan), in T. Moriguchi (ed.) Ino Yoshinori Fānyŭ Diàochá Shŏucè, Taipei: Southern Materials Center, pp. 13-201.

Jiang, L. and Liu, L. (2006) 'New evidence for the origins of sedentism and rice domestication in the Lower Yangzi River, China', Antiquity, 80: 355-61.

Lĭ, J. (1999) Bùyāng Yŭ Yánjiū (Researches on the Buyang Language), Beijing: Zhōngyāng Mínzú Dàxué.

Li, P. J-K. (1995) 'Formosan vs. non-Formosan features in some Austronesian Languages in Taiwan', in P.J.-k. Li, D.-a. Ho, Y.-k. Huang, C.-h. Tsang and C.-y. Tseng (eds) Austronesian Studies Relating to Taiwan (Symposium series of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, no. 3), pp. 651-81, Taipei: Academia Sinica.

Li, P. J-K. (1999) 'Some problems in the Basay Language', Selected Papers on Formosan Languages, vol. 1, pp. 479-509, Taipei: Academia Sinica.

Li, P. J-K. (2001) 'Basai yŭ de dìwèi' (The position of Basai), Language and Linguistics, 2(2): 155-71.

Li, P. J.-K. and Tsuchida, S. (2001) Pazih Dictionary, Nankang: Institute of Linguistics (preparatory office), Academia Sinica.

Ling, C. (1970) A Study of the Raft, Outrigger, Double and Deck Canoes of Ancient China, the Pacific and the Indian Oceans, Nankang: Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica.

Londo, J.P., Chiang, Y.-C., Hung, K.-H., Chiang, T.-Y. and Schaal, B.A. (2006) 'Phylogeography of Asian wild rice, Oryza rufipogon, reveals multiple independent domestications of cultivated rice, Oryza sativa', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (20 June), 103(25): 9578-83.

Lu, T.L.-D. (2005) 'The origin and dispersal of agriculture and human diaspora in East Asia', in L. Sagart, R.M. Blench and A. Sanchez-Mazas (eds) The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics, London: Routledge Curzon.

Matisoff, J. (2003). Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Meacham, C. and Estabrook, G. (1985) 'Compatibility methods in systematics', Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 16: 431-46.

Norman, J. and Mei, T. (1976) 'The Austroasiatics in ancient south China: some lexical evidence', Monumenta Serica, 32: 274-301.

Ogawa, N. and Asai, E. (1935) The Myths and Traditions of the Formosan Native Tribes, Taipei.

Ostapirat, W. (2000) 'Proto-Kra', Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 23: 1.

Ostapirat, W. (2005) 'Kra-Dai and Austronesian: notes on phonological correspondences and vocabulary distribution', in L. Sagart, R.M. Blench and A. Sanchez-Mazas (eds) The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics, London: RoutledgeCurzon.

Pecoraro, F. (1977) 'Essai de dictionnaire taroko-français', Cahier d'Archipel, 7: 1-277.

Reid, L. (1982) 'The demise of Proto-Philippines', in A. Halim, L. Carrington and S.A. Wurm (eds) Papers from the Third International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, vol. 2, Tracking the Travellers, pp. 210-16, Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.

Reid, L. (1994) 'Morphological evidence for Austric', Oceanic Linguistics, 33: 323-44.

Reid, L. (2005) 'The current status of Austric: a review and evaluation of the lexical and morphosyntactic evidence', in L. Sagart, R.M. Blench and A. Sanchez-Mazas (eds) The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics, pp. 132-60, London: RoutledgeCurzon.

Renfrew, C. (1996) 'Language families and the spread of farming', in D. Harris (ed.) The Origins and Spread of Agriculture in Eurasia, pp. 70-92, London: UCL Press.

Sagart, L. (1994) 'Old Chinese and Proto-Austronesian evidence for Sino-Austronesian', Oceanic Linguistics, 33: 271-308.

Sagart, L. (1995) 'Comments from Sagart', in W.S.-Y. Wang (ed.) The Ancestry of the Chinese Language (Journal of Chinese Linguistics, monograph series, 8), pp. 337-72.

Sagart, L. (1999) The Roots of Old Chinese (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 184), Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Sagart, L. (2001) 'Comment: Malayo-Polynesian features in the AN-related vocabulary in Kadai', paper presented at the workshop 'Perspectives on the Phylogeny of East Asian Languages', 28-31 Aug., Périgueux.

Sagart, L. (2003) 'The vocabulary of cereal cultivation and the phylogeny of East Asian languages', Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association, 23 (Taipei papers), 1: 127-36.

Sagart, L. (2004) 'The higher phylogeny of Austronesian and the position of Tai-Kadai', Oceanic Linguistics, 43: 411-44.

Sagart, L. (2005a) 'Tai-Kadai as a subgroup of Austronesian', in L. Sagart, R.M. Blench and A. Sanchez-Mazas (eds) The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics, pp. 161-76, London: RoutledgeCurzon.

Sagart, L. (2005b) 'Sino-Tibetan-Austronesian: An updated and improved argument', in L. Sagart, R.M. Blench and A. Sanchez-Mazas (eds) The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics, pp. 177-81, London: Routledge Curzon.

Sagart, L. (2006a) 'Review: James A. Matisoff (2003) Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman. System and philosophy of Sino-Tibeto-Burman reconstruction', Diachronica, 22: 206- 23.

Sagart, L. (2006b) 'The PAN words for "7", "8", "9" and Austronesian subgrouping', Powerpoint presentation for the 10th International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Puerto Princesa, Philippines, 17-23 Jan.

Sagart, L., Blench, R.M. and Sanchez-Mazas, A. (2005) 'Introduction', in L. Sagart, R.M. Blench and A. Sanchez-Mazas (eds) The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics, pp. 1-14, London: RoutledgeCurzon.

Schmidt, W. (1906) Die Mon-Khmer Völker, ein Bindeglied zwischen Völkern Zentralasiens und Austronesiens, Brunswick: Friedrich Vieweg & Sohn.

Soothill, W.E. and Hodous, L. (n.d.) Dictionary of Chinese Buddhist Terms, digital edition: http://www.hm.tyg.jp/~acmuller/soothill/soothill-hodous.html, accessed 3 Aug. 2004.

Thurgood, G. (1994) 'Tai-Kadai and Austronesian: the nature of the historical relationship', Oceanic Linguistics, 33(2): 345-68.

Tsang, C.-h. (2005) 'Recent discoveries at a Tapenkeng culture site in Taiwan: implications for the problem of Austronesian origins', in L. Sagart, R.M. Blench and A. Sanchez- Mazas (eds) The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics, pp. 63-74, London: RoutledgeCurzon.

Tung, T.H. (1964) A Descriptive Study of the Tsou Language, Nankang: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica.

Wright, H.T. (2004) 'New archaeological information on early Holocene communities in central and southeastern China', paper presented to the symposium 'Human Migrations in Continental East Asia and Taiwan: Genetic, Linguistic and Archaeological Evidence', University of Geneva.

Wu, C.-l. (2000) Amĕi yŭ cānkăo yŭfă (A Reference Grammar of Amis), Taipei: Yuanliu.

Tsuchida, S., Yamada, Y. and Moriguchi, T. (1991) Linguistic Materials of the Formosan Sinicized Populations, vol. 1, Siraya and Basai, Tokyo: Linguistics Department, University of Tokyo.

Yuasa, H. (2000) Segawa's Illustrated Ethnography of Indigenous Formosan People/the Tsou, Taipei: Southern Materials Center.

zeitoun, E. (2000a) Lŭkăi yŭ cānkăo yŭfă (A Reference Grammar of Rukai), Taipei: Yuanliu.

zeitoun, E. (2000b) Bùnóng yŭ cānkăo yŭfă (A Reference Grammar of Bunun), Taipei: Yuanliu.

zhang, J. and Wang, X. (1998) 'Notes on the recent discovery of ancient cultivated rice at Jiahu, Henan Province: a new theory concerning the origin of Oryza Japonica in China', Antiquity, 72: 897-901.

zhèngzhāng, S. (1991) 'Decipherment of Yuè-Rén-Gē', Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale, 20: 159-68.