Don’t leave your CMMC Level 2 assessment to chance. Set your organization up for certification success with the right preparation and strategy—arriving operationally ready and confident that your C3PAO assessment will validate your readiness, not expose gaps. Download The CMMC Level 2 Assessment Guide: https://bit.ly/42d741Q
About us
CyberSheath is one of the industry’s few one-stop cybersecurity compliance service providers, going beyond assessment and software licensing to solve the whole problem. We help your organization achieve and maintain full compliance with DOD requirements at the appropriate level, with a minimum amount of pain. CyberSheath staff members have been working with the DOD on DFARS-related issues since 2008, initially as a part of the Defense Industrial Base — Cyber Security Initiative (DIB-CSI). As a leader of that initiative, CyberSheath Founder Eric Noonan helped draft the first DFARS clause issued in 2013 and every subsequent update. Cybersecurity compliance is all we do. With thousands of NIST 800-171 assessments and implementations successfully completed for DOD contractors, we can help you cut through the confusion of NIST 800-171 and guarantee complete, ongoing and fully documented compliance.
- Website
-
https://www.cybersheath.com/
External link for CyberSheath
- Industry
- IT Services and IT Consulting
- Company size
- 51-200 employees
- Headquarters
- Reston, VA
- Type
- Privately Held
- Founded
- 2012
- Specialties
- Vulnerability Assessments, Incident Response, Regulatory Compliance Assessments, Damage Assessments, Compliance & Risk Mapping, Archer eGRC, Security Assessments, Privileged Account Management, CyberArk Professional Services, NIST 800-171, DFARS, Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP), DFARs 252.204-7012, and CMMC
Locations
-
Primary
Get directions
11710 Plaza America Dr
Reston, VA 20190, US
Employees at CyberSheath
Updates
-
If you missed it: Top 4 CMMC Confessions With CMMC now appearing in DOD contracts, preparation matters more than ever. Michael Bailie, CyberSheath VP of Solution Engineering, shares lessons from helping hundreds of contractors navigate the process: ➡️ Common pitfalls ➡️ Key roadblocks ➡️ What sets successful teams apart 👉 Access the full session > https://bit.ly/4ejLoZe
-
-
Across the DIB, a consistent issue is showing up: compliance programs that look complete on paper are breaking down when assessors start asking how controls are actually implemented, enforced, and proven. That gap is widening as teams rush “compliance,” with automation and tooling making compliance easier to document even as weak operational controls allow the gap between documented compliance and real-world implementation to grow. In the latest issue of The CMMC Compliance Brief, we break down: 🔶 How one contractor achieved CMMC Level 2—and what actually made it work 🔶 Why faster CMMC efforts are weakening assurance 🔶 How the False Claims Act expands cybersecurity exposure beyond audits 🔶 Why C3PAO assessments stall before they begin 🔶 What survives C3PAO scrutiny The real test isn’t whether something is documented. It’s whether it holds up when it’s challenged. If you’re preparing for CMMC Level 2, this will help you see where programs break before an assessor ever gets there. ⬇️
-
📢 Happening Tomorrow: CMMC Stories from the Field With CMMC requirements continuing to appear in DOD contracts, organizations are being pushed to act. But the question is: are you prepared for what the process actually looks like in practice? Tomorrow, Michael Bailie, drawing on his experience helping hundreds of DOD contractors achieve compliance, will share real-world experiences from the field, including: 🔶 Where organizations go wrong at the start 🔶 The roadblocks that delay certification efforts 🔶 Internal challenges organizations face during implementation 🔶 What successful organizations do differently 🔶 Preparing for the CMMC assessment process Last chance to join. Register here: https://bit.ly/4mh6ERk
-
-
#CMMCDay is bringing together the cybersecurity community and we’re proud to be a Silver Sponsor! 🤝 As the full rollout of CMMC approaches, we’ll be there alongside our partners from Carahsoft connecting with defense contractors and suppliers preparing for compliance and upcoming assessments. 📍 College Park, MD 📅 May 4 & 5 Planning to attend? Stop by Booth #108 on May 4 to connect with our team.
-
-
CIS Secure achieved a perfect 110 on their CMMC Level 2 assessment—and finished ahead of schedule. But it didn’t happen by accident. Their experience highlights a few realities defense contractors often underestimate: ✅ Start early. The compliance process requires significant time investment. ✅ Secure leadership buy-in for resource allocation and prioritization. ✅ Engage trusted partners to reduce risk and accelerate success. ✅ Plan for organizational changes that may impact scope or timelines. ✅ Treat compliance as ongoing, not a one-time event. Read their full story > https://bit.ly/3M5v4iR
-
-
���Pencil whipping is dead.” ✏️ With increased False Claims Act activity and DOJ involvement, submitting an SPRS score or attestation of compliance can be a legal and financial liability if you can’t back it up. As Casey Lang puts it, it’s about “living the life of evidence so that you have confidence in your compliance program”—where your processes are executed consistently and can be demonstrated at any time. Because the risk isn’t just failing an assessment. It’s realizing too late that what you submitted doesn’t hold up under scrutiny. If you’re planning for CMMC, this is exactly what we’ll unpack in our upcoming webinar: 📢 CMMC Confessions: What Contractors Should Know Before Implementation 📅 April 29 | 9 AM PT | 12 PM ET We’ll cover where organizations go wrong early, what actually delays certification, and what successful teams do differently. 👉 Register here: https://bit.ly/4mh6ERk
-
According to C3PAOs, many defense contractors are not fully prepared for a CMMC Level 2 assessment. Organizations often walk into assessments believing they are ready, only to discover their environment can’t be fully validated by an assessor. At that point, the assessment doesn’t proceed. Timelines slip. Costs increase. And in many cases, contract eligibility is put at risk. This is the “false start” problem—and it’s becoming more common as pressure builds to move faster. To help break down what C3PAOs actually expect from defense contractors during an assessment, we’ve put together a practical guide built on direct assessor insights. If you’re preparing for CMMC Level 2 or thinking about how to start, this will give you a clear, ground-level view of how assessors evaluate readiness. Download The CMMC Level 2 Assessment Guide: https://bit.ly/4c3Xinm
-
-
There’s no “set it and forget it” in CMMC. You don’t just implement all 110 required controls to achieve certification—you have to maintain compliance and be ready to prove it when it counts. As Michael Bailie puts it: “There's no magic tool, no magic program. It’s people, processes, and technology coming together.” That’s what many organizations underestimate. Not the controls, but the ability to operate them, validate them, and stand behind them during an audit. If you're planning for CMMC, this is exactly what we’ll unpack in our upcoming webinar: ➡️ CMMC Confessions: What Contractors Should Know Before Implementation 📅 April 29 | 9 AM PT | 12 PM ET Michael, who has guided hundreds of defense contractors through CMMC readiness, will share real-world experiences and lessons learned: what worked, what didn’t, and what organizations wish they understood earlier. Register here: https://bit.ly/4mh6ERk
-
The False Claims Act is increasingly being used in cases where organizations attest that they meet cybersecurity standards—whether tied to NIST SP 800-171, CMMC, or other contractual requirements. Those statements carry legal weight. If they are materially inaccurate, the issue is no longer a gap to remediate. It becomes a potential enforcement action. For executive teams, the implication is straightforward: cybersecurity is now tied directly to legal and financial accountability. What’s stated in proposals, certifications, and ongoing performance must be grounded in verifiable evidence. Documentation needs to reflect reality. This isn’t a new obligation. But it is a new level of consequence. Learn how to mitigate FCA-related risk and safeguard your DOD contracts: https://bit.ly/41F62LM