Corporate Social Responsibility

Six months ago I installed a home battery and since then I haven't needed to import any energy from the grid. But that's not to say I haven't been using the grid. Most days I've still been able to export energy back into the grid during the evening peak, when feed-in rates are much higher. The house and car are now effectively powered by solar. Excess generation in the middle of the day is stored and shifted into the evening, when it’s actually needed. This is what that looks like in practice: ✅ Solar generated in the middle of the day is shifted into the evening peak ✅ A 32 kWh battery is covering household demand and still leaving surplus to export ✅ As this scales, it reduces demand during the most expensive hours And this is happening at scale. In just eight months, Australians have installed more than 250,000 home batteries, adding around 6.3 GWh of storage behind the meter – all paired with rooftop solar. And these batteries aren't just benefitting their owners. By reducing demand during the evening peak, they put downward pressure on wholesale prices. Between avoiding grid imports and exporting during the peak, the battery is on track to deliver around $2,500 per year. As we head into winter, that will probably change. Solar output will fall, the battery won't fill as often and I'll likely start importing from the grid again for a while. Tariffs offering free off-peak periods would be well suited to this. Rooftop solar turned millions of households into generators. Home batteries are now turning them into grid assets – shifting energy into the hours when it’s actually needed.

The European Central Bank is now making the economic case for decarbonisation. Not as climate policy. As monetary policy. Frank Elderson, ECB board member, argues in the Financial Times that Europe's dependence on imported fossil fuels is a structural threat to price stability (👉 https://lnkd.in/eKWWjKbh). The data is damning: energy price shocks pushed euro area inflation to 10.6% in October 2022. Every geopolitical tremor in the Middle East shows up in European energy bills. And the ECB is caught in an impossible bind: tighten to fight inflation and deepen the slowdown, ease to support growth and entrench inflation. The solution is not better forecasting models or finetuned monetary policy. It is cheaper energy. Spain shows what is possible. Wholesale electricity prices in early 2024 were approximately 40% lower than they would have been had wind and solar generation remained at 2019 levels ( 👉 https://lnkd.in/edXgxh9q). Once the infrastructure is built, the energy itself is virtually free. Volatile global commodity markets simply become less relevant. Elderson is explicit: €660 billion per year in clean energy investment sounds large. But Europe already spends nearly €400 billion annually on fossil fuel imports, money that leaves the continent and buys geopolitical vulnerability. Analysis in the UK shows that for every pound invested in sustainable energy, benefits outweigh costs by a factor of 2.2 to 4.1 ( 👉 https://lnkd.in/emEXVfiw). This is precisely what I argued in my piece for Triodos a few weeks ago: Europe's crisis response has been backwards. We keep treating energy dependence as a shock to manage rather than a structural problem to fix. (👉https://lnkd.in/ehFqA6iY) The ECB cannot decarbonise Europe. What it can do is name the conditions: keep the ETS, mobilise capital toward renewable capacity, strip out fossil fuel subsidies, and stop confusing cheap fossil fuels with affordable energy. If people need help with energy costs, target it: don't suppress the price signal that drives the transition. The cheapest energy is the energy we no longer have to import.

This visual helps explain 3 concepts that A LOT of people forget about solar☀️   Solar energy’s fuel (sunshine) is free and delivered daily.   Therefore, electricity from solar does not include the cost of each marginal unit of fuel. That makes sense to people.   But the full implications of an energy system built upon a zero-cost, abundant fuel source are often still dramatically underestimated.   There are three other kinds of savings that solar provides:    Infrastructure Savings – As shown in the graphic, the world spends billions of dollars every year extracting oil, gas, and coal and transporting to the places it will be burned. The infrastructure to mine, refine, and move these fuels from point A to point B, whether by boat, rail, or pipeline, requires regular maintenance and TONS of investment. With solar, the sun does it all for us, delivering usable photons every morning.   Predictability Savings – When you’re relying on a globally traded commodity to produce electricity, the final cost of each gigawatt can fluctuate with the current price of oil and coal. Market uncertainty can send the price of these commodities (and the final price for electricity) soaring on a whim. But it doesn’t need to be this way. Once a solar farm is installed, the cost of each unit of electricity is basically fixed. This helps utilities better predict their costs and that’s a huge benefit to consumers.   Energy Independence Savings – Because oil, gas, and coal rely on complex international supply chains and lots of global infrastructure, there is a lot more that can go wrong. Geopolitical shocks, natural disasters, port congestion, and accidents (remember the Suez Canal blockage?) can all impact the predictability and reliability of coal and gas generation. No one can embargo the sun or interrupt its delivery to us, so solar energy is fundamentally more local and more independent.   I think it’s important to explain these hidden savings when talking to naysayers because, while they may understand that free sunshine = free fuel, they may not understand just how much they’re paying for the infrastructure, uncertainty, and volatility of fossil fuels.

500 students share one computer in Niger. Yet they're conducting advanced physics experiments that students at elite schools can't access. The secret? WebAR turning basic smartphones into portable STEM labs. Think about that. In Sub-Saharan Africa, fewer than 10% of schools have internet. Student-to-computer ratios hit 500:1. Yet mobile subscriptions jumped from single digits to 80% in a decade. Students already carry the infrastructure—we just weren't using it right. Traditional EdTech Reality: ↳ VR headsets: $300+ per student ↳ Heavy apps requiring 5G speeds ↳ Labs costing millions to build ↳ Rural schools: permanently excluded The WebAR Revolution: ↳ Runs in any browser, optimized for 3G ↳ No app store, minimal storage ↳ Science scores improving 10-15% ↳ Every smartphone becomes a laboratory But here's what grabbed me: A physics teacher in rural South Africa has one broken oscilloscope. No budget. Her students scan printed markers, and electromagnetic fields pulse across their desks. They run experiments infinitely—no equipment damaged, no reagents consumed. One student told her: "Engineering is for people like me now. The lab fits in my pocket." What changes everything: ↳ Mobile-first matches actual connectivity ↳ Browser-based works offline ↳ Teachers need training, not new buildings ↳ Inequality becomes irrelevant The Multiplication Effect: 1 teacher with markers = 30 students experimenting 10 schools sharing content = communities transformed 100 districts adopting = educational equality emerging At scale = STEM education without infrastructure gaps We spent decades waiting for labs that won't arrive. Now any browser becomes one. Because when a student in rural Africa explores the same 3D molecules as someone at MIT—using the phone already in their pocket—you realize: WebAR isn't shiny technology. It's a quiet equaliser making world-class STEM education fit into 3G connections and $50 phones. Follow me, Dr. Martha Boeckenfeld for innovations where accessibility drives transformation. ♻️ Share if you believe quality education shouldn't require perfect infrastructure.

Grid bottlenecks are a feature — not a bug — of the energy transition. For years, we viewed economics as the main hurdle to scaling clean energy. High costs for wind, solar, heat pumps, and storage dominated the conversation. But the world has changed. Thanks to extraordinary innovation and dramatic cost reductions in renewables and electrification technologies, the bottlenecks we face today are different. They’re no longer about whether clean energy is affordable — it is. Instead, the challenge is whether our energy systems can evolve quickly enough to integrate it. A recent Financial Times piece highlights this clearly: across Europe, the rapid build-out of renewable generation now outpaces the ability of grids to move electricity to where it’s needed. Curtailment, congestion, and long queues for grid connections already cost billions annually — and without decisive action, these costs will grow. This isn’t a sign of failure. It’s a sign of success. It means the transition is happening faster than the infrastructure built for the fossil era can handle. The rise of decentralised, variable renewables and electrified heating and transport requires a fundamentally different approach to planning — one that anticipates growth rather than reacts to it. The EU’s move toward more coordinated, top-down scenario building and cross-border grid planning recognises exactly this. Better alignment between countries and system operators, faster permitting, and prioritisation of critical projects are essential steps to unlock the full value of cheap clean energy. Because every euro lost to bottlenecks is not a cost of climate action — it’s a cost of not modernising our grids fast enough. The more successful we are in deploying renewables and electrification, the more urgently we must upgrade and expand our grids. Grid constraints are not a reason to slow down. They’re a reason to speed up the transformation of an energy system that was never designed for the technologies now powering our transition.

IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) CRISIS WASN’T IN THE SKIES. IT WAS IN THE LEADERSHIP CABIN. Three things stood out. One: Employees were left alone to face furious customers. No leader should ever let that happen. If you don’t stand by your people in a storm, don’t expect them to stand by your customers in the sun. Customer experience collapses the moment employees feel abandoned. Two: In any crisis, honesty is the only strategy that works. This time, the communication wasn’t transparent. When leaders hide the full picture, years of goodwill can disappear overnight. A crisis can earn trust, but only if you tell the truth. Three: The belief that “we are too big to be ignored” has ended more companies than competition ever has. Customers always have a choice. And if they don’t, they will create one. We shouldn’t watch the Indigo crisis like spectators. This is a reminder for every leader to build their own crisis blueprint. Because crises will come, when they do, your response becomes your reputation. There is more to business than profits. There are people, trust, and how you show up when it matters most.

🗞️ 🇺🇦 Fascinating reporting this week on Russia 🇷🇺 ‘s sophisticated “digital occupation” of #Telegram within occupied Ukrainian territories, using thousands of bot. Incredibly thorough work by Atlantic Council Digital Forensic Research Lab (DFRLab) and OpenMinds analysts. 👉🏼🤖 automated campaigns distorting local sentiment, legitimizing occupation, drowning out Ukrainian voices- overpowering platform-based takedown efforts. 🧠 A concerning long term impact of a « #digital #occupation » is our future ability to understand the war truthfully. What data will historians work on ? During eventual reintegration of occupied territories, understanding fully the tactics of a « digital occupation » will be vital for rebuilding media resilience &restoring #informationintegrity. 🎯Between Jan 2024 and Apr 2025, 3,634 automated accounts (bots) posted over 316,000 comments 🔹2.9 million comments analysed, in 110 Telegram channels tied to Russian‑occupied Ukrainian territories 🔹Expanded dataset to ~3.37 million comments across ~4,500 channels. 🔹Employed topic modeling, manual annotation (3,450 samples), keyword classification, and GPT‑4 assistance to define 69 narrative themes and train a classifier 🤖 They deployed 3 main narrative types: pro‑Russian, anti‑Ukrainian rhetoric, neutral or abstract “anti­‑war” peace appeals. 🔹In channels linked to occupied areas, pro‑Russian messages—praising Russian infrastructure, culture, government—were prevalent 🔹Messages reacted to local events—water/electricity shortages—and proactively praised Russian state services initiated locally. 🔹Activity surged around key events—Ukrainian shortages, Putin’s re‑election, terrorist attacks—reactive propaganda. In occupied areas, they stabilized backgrounds of “normalcy” with infrastructure repair messaging. 🔹bot automation : Accounts used incoherent language, some posting over 1,000 comments/day, recycled links to pro‑Russian or Western outlets, and had generic profile data 🔹 A single #bot published 1,391 comments in one day across 65 channels, weaving through 40 themes and criticizing Zelenskyy in 24 % of its posts. 🔍 Effects 🔹flooding local chats with supportive messages creates illusion of widespread approval of Russian occupation 🔹Suppressing accurate info: digital offensive complements infrastructure control, limiting access to Ukrainian media and reinforces Kremlin narratives 🔹mass is making Telegram’s efforts to remove bots inefficient; new accounts quickly replace banned ones. = complicates Ukrainian authorities’ ability to reach occupied populations with truthful information. 👉🏼Full report : https://lnkd.in/eQaJWxPu 🙏🏻 Thank you & congrats to the 2 editors Layla Mashkoor, deputy director of research at the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab Sviatoslav Hnizdovskyi, CEO and founder of OpenMinds 🧑🧑🧒🧒And their teams!

One image just disrupted a £22 billion fashion empire more effectively than a thousand sustainability reports. 🔥 This isn't an official SHEIN campaign gone wrong. It's artist Emanuele Morelli's AI creation—a haunting visualisation showing what fast fashion's "affordability" really costs us. The image speaks volumes: a SHEIN billboard where the model's flowing dress transforms into a cascade of textile waste. Art communicating what statistics alone cannot. 5 uncomfortable truths this image forces us to confront: 1. The scale of fashion waste is staggering → 92 million tonnes of textile waste produced annually  → The equivalent of one rubbish lorry of textiles dumped every second  → Most fast fashion items designed to be worn fewer than 10 times 2. The business model depends on our amnesia → Constantly changing trends keep us buying  → Ultra-low prices remove financial friction  → Digital marketing creates artificial scarcity and FOMO  → We're trained to forget yesterday's purchases 3. The true cost isn't on the price tag → Environmental damage from production chemicals  → Microplastics shedding into water systems  → Supply chain ethics compromised for speed and cost  → Communities near production sites bearing health consequences 4. Our definition of "affordable" is broken → When clothing is cheaper than a coffee, someone else is paying  → True cost spread across communities, environments, and future generations  → Psychological cost of constant consumption never factored in 5. Solutions exist but require systemic change → Circular fashion models gaining traction  → Rental and resale markets growing rapidly  → Consumer awareness rising but needs to translate to behaviour While SHEIN isn't the only culprit in the fast fashion ecosystem, Morelli's artwork throws a spotlight on an uncomfortable reality we've normalised. What we wear reflects our values more than our taste. What is your wardrobe saying about yours? Image: Emanuele Morelli ♻️ Found this helpful? Repost to share with your network.  ��� Want more content like this? Hit follow Maya Moufarek.

This Danish foundation gives away $1.3 billion annually – and their secret isn't efficiency ratios, it's something far more radical: They implement nothing. Behind this Danish foundation's rapid rise is Ozempic – the blockbuster diabetes and weight-loss drug that's generated unprecedented profits for Novo Nordisk. The Novo Nordisk Foundation, which owns about a quarter of the pharmaceutical giant, has become one of the world's wealthiest charitable foundations with assets around $167 billion. Yet rather than hiring armies of staff like other major philanthropies, they've gone the opposite direction. In a recent interview, their Chief Scientific Officer for Health Flemming Konradsen revealed their secret to me: They don't implement – they only work through partners. Zero programs. Zero direct service delivery. The model: ➡️ Find what already works  ➡️ Partner with governments who own the strategy ➡️ Create sustainable markets, not dependency  ➡️ Stay for 15+ years, not 3-year cycles Example: Their school feeding programs create permanent markets for local farmers while training health workers and scaling AI solutions across continents. The hard part? Saying no to putting your name on things. Letting partners get the credit. Trusting that influence matters more than control. For development professionals: This approach creates new opportunities. These ultra-efficient funders skip the usual suspects and source partners who can be trusted with strategy, not just execution. They're looking for implementers who think like owners. If you can demonstrate government relationships, long-term thinking, and the ability to build sustainable systems (not just deliver projects), you become invaluable to this new breed of funders. What could your organization accomplish if it stopped trying to do everything itself? Disclaimer: I’ve edited this post as it’s been flagged that Novo Nordisk Foundation has 250 employees. #Philanthropy #Partnership #Foundation 📷 Novo Nordisk Foundation

Global sales of EVs and hybrid vehicles hit 1.2 million units in February 2025. That's a massive 50% jump compared to last year. But get this: China accounted for nearly 75% of those sales! I've posted before about the pace in China, and it just keeps accelerating. EV sales there are up 76% year-on-year. Brands like BYD, Xiaomi, Xpeng, and Zeekr are launching new models at lightning speed, moving from plug-in hybrids to fully electric in record time. In Europe, the race is still on. Volkswagen boosted BEV sales by 180%, BMW overtook Tesla, and Chinese-owned brands reportedly outsold Tesla in Europe for the first time. Meanwhile, Tesla's EU market share hit a five-year low. But what I still can't get over is the insane pace in China! I recently drove a Xiaomi EV in Shanghai that felt like a one-to-one copy of the Porsche Taycan for $40,000. Incredible materials, smooth drive, and great steering. Even my engineer, who was with me, was impressed. And this is just four years after Xiaomi said, "Let's make cars." Now, they're producing 100,000 a year. Also extremely interesting is that 20% of the car's cost is subsidised. That kind of scale-up is of course possible based on massive government backing. On the autonomous side, I've experienced Waymo in San Francisco and Hyundai's lidar-based system in Shanghai: fully self-driving, even in chaotic traffic. The future is already here. And I've become a real fan, especially when I need to work between meetings or get to the airport. Same as Vay for teledriven car sharing. There’s so much going on! Has Europe lost the race? No! Not yet. But we're under pressure. And we need to move faster. The future is 100% electric: that's crystal clear to me. Hybrids may be an important bridge, but the long-term path is electrification, enabled by renewables. So the real question is: Can Europe match China's speed, scale, and tech leadership? Or are we looking at a permanent power shift in the EV industry?  I'd love to hear your thoughts in the comments. #EV #ElectricVehicles #Mobility #Innovation #ChinaEV #EuropeEV #Automotive