Stand up for the facts!

Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.

More Info

I would like to contribute

President Donald Trump speaks at an event to mark National Purple Heart Day in the East Room of the White House, Aug. 7, 2025, in Washington. (AP) President Donald Trump speaks at an event to mark National Purple Heart Day in the East Room of the White House, Aug. 7, 2025, in Washington. (AP)

President Donald Trump speaks at an event to mark National Purple Heart Day in the East Room of the White House, Aug. 7, 2025, in Washington. (AP)

Maria Ramirez Uribe
By Maria Ramirez Uribe August 8, 2025

Trump’s claims of negative net migration are premature. Some analysts say it could happen.

If Your Time is short

  • At least five financial groups or think tanks have published 2025 projections about "net migration" — how the number of people immigrating to the U.S. compares with the number moving out of the country.

  • One group predicted negative net migration to the U.S. this year, meaning more people will leave the U.S. than immigrate to it.

  • The four other groups estimated that although net migration will be lower in 2025 than it has been in the past, it will not be negative.

President Donald Trump said he has fulfilled one of his campaign promises: More people are leaving the country than immigrating to it, he said.

"Promises made. Promises kept. Negative net migration for the first time in 50 years!" Trump said in a Truth Social post Aug. 4.

Other White House officials touted it as a historic development.

"During the last period in which America was the undisputed global superpower — finically, culturally, militarily — immigration was net negative," Deputy White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said in an Aug. 3  X post. "All population growth was from family formation."

The statements followed an Aug. 3 segment by CNN chief data analyst Harry Enten, who said, "2025 net migration in the U.S. down at least 60% from last year. In fact, we may be heading for the first time in at least 50 years in which we have net negative migration into the United States." Miller included the CNN clip in his X post, and the White House also shared it in a news release.

Sign up for PolitiFact texts

What "may be" is a prediction. That’s different from what is. We checked the data.  

The available numbers are 2025 projections, not final numbers. One think tank predicts there will be negative net migration to the U.S. this year. Others estimate that although net migration will be lower than in years past, it will not be negative.

Negative net migration is possible in 2025, but Trump "has no basis to make that claim until the US Census Bureau analyzes the 2025 data next year," Michael Clemens, George Mason University economics professor, said.

According to the Census Bureau calendar, net migration data will be published in December 2025.

When PolitiFact asked the White House for evidence net migration is in the negative, a spokesperson shared Enten’s CNN clip. 

"President Trump was elected on his promise to end illegal immigration, deport criminal illegal aliens, and put Americans First — that’s exactly what he’s doing," White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said. 

The White House did not respond to our questions about what period Miller was referring to as the one in which the immigration was "net negative."

What is net migration? 

Net migration measures how many people immigrated to the U.S. minus the number of people who moved out of the county. If it’s positive, more people entered than left. This number is used to determine how many people live in the U.S., how old they are and how many can participate in the labor force, for example.

"As the U.S. population ages and more U.S.-born residents enter retirement, immigration will become increasingly important for driving labor force growth," the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute said in an October report.

Historically, the country’s population has grown as births exceeded deaths, according to a December 2024 U.S. Census Bureau report. But in recent years, with fewer births and more deaths, the U.S. has relied on net migration for population growth.

Determining net migration relies on data about how many people immigrated to the U.S., including people who entered illegally and were released into the U.S. to seek asylum, people who evaded border officials and people who entered legally on visas or through the refugee program. The number also accounts for people who left the country voluntarily and through deportation. 

The 2025 net migration is "contingent on the administration’s progress toward its deportation goal," Clemens said. And it will "not be independently verifiable until the Census Bureau conducts independent analysis late next year."

RELATED: How much power does Donald Trump have to change the census and who is counted in it?

When did the U.S. last experience negative net migration? 

Net immigration data from before 2000 is limited. However, from 1971 to 1980, around 50 years ago, net migration was positive, according to the Congressional Research Service

The U.S. experienced negative net migration more than 85 years ago, in the period from 1931 to 1940. The U.S. was in the midst of the Great Depression during most of those years. In response to high unemployment rates, the U.S. government carried out an effort to expel millions of Mexicans, including those born in the U.S. 

A January 2022 study published in the Journal of Public Economics found the repatriations "resulted in reduced employment" and U.S. born workers taking lower skilled jobs.

A 2024 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Real Estate study found that expelling Mexicans from the U.S. during that period "negatively impacted U.S. cities" by lowering house values and slowing real estate growth.

Clemens said these examples show that "net negative immigration is a story of shame and loss from around 90 years ago, not a story of triumph from 50 years ago."

What have economists said about 2025 net migration?

Of the five groups that published 2025 net migration estimates, all agree that U.S. net migration will decrease. 

In July, the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank, said net migration will likely fall between a loss of 525,000 people to a gain of 115,000 people. The report was co-authored by two economists from the nonpartisan Brookings Institution.

"Though small positive net flows are within our projected range and certainly possible, we believe zero or net negative migration for the year is more likely," the group’s report said.

Among its reasons for the predicted "dramatic decrease" is one simple one: The number of people immigrating to the U.S. has and will continue to drop. Illegal immigration at the U.S. southern border has dropped sharply during the Trump administration. Trump has also curtailed several programs that allow people to enter the U.S. legally, such as the refugee program which he has indefinitely paused.

Featured Fact-check

The American Enterprise Institute also predicted that fewer work and student visas will be issued this year due to additional vetting and travel bans.

The number of people moving out of the U.S. is also likely to increase, the group said. Mass deportations and people choosing to voluntarily leave in a "generalized fear and anti-immigrant climate" play a role.

Stan Veuger, a senior fellow at the institute and one of the report’s authors, said it may be impossible to know with certainty whether there will be negative net migration in 2025, particularly "if the number is close to zero, as it may well be." He said it’s especially difficult to track people who voluntarily leave the U.S. 

In July, the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco estimated a 2025 net migration of about 1 million people. The number is a drop from the 2.8 million net immigration growth in 2024, the Census Bureau reported.

"The number of immigrants entering the United States began to decline in the second half of 2024 and fell sharply in the first half of 2025," the reserve bank’s report said.

In a June podcast, Sam Coffin, a senior economist at the investment banking company Morgan Stanley, estimated a net population growth of 300,000 people in 2025. That same month, Oxford Economics, a global advisory firm, projected a net migration of 500,000 in 2025. 

How do drops in net migration affect the U.S. economy? 

Despite having different projections, the groups noted that reduced or negative net migration could negatively affect the economy. Among them: 

  • The American Enterprise Institute predicted it could slow labor force growth and decrease the country’s gross domestic product — the sum of all goods and services produced within a nation's borders.

  • Oxford Economics cited lower GDP and increased inflation resulting from a smaller labor force that is unlikely to be filled by U.S.-born workers.

Some of the analyses noted that the effects may be limited, one group said high net migration in previous years will help offset some of these effects.

Our ruling

Trump said, "Promises kept: negative net migration for the first time in 50 years."

What Trump presented as a statement of fact is actually a predictive summary of a more cautious CNN clip.

Multiple projections say 2025 net migration is likely to show a notable decline. But there are no current numbers showing the U.S. has reached negative net migration in 2025, as Trump’s statement reads.

Among five published estimates, one projected that the U.S. will have 2025 negative net migration and four predicted net migration will decline but remain positive.

The Census Bureau will publish net migration estimates in December 2025.

The last time the U.S. had negative net migration was at least 85 years ago, during the Great Depression.

The statement contains an element of truth but ignores critical facts that would give a different impression. We rate it Mostly False.

Our Sources

President Donal Trump, Truth Social post, Aug. 4, 2025

The White House, ICYMI: Negative Net Migration for the First Time in at Least 50 Years, Aug. 3, 2025

Stephen Miller, X post, Aug. 3, 2025

Rapid Response 47, X post, Aug. 3, 2025

World Bank Group, Net migration, c

Migration Policy Institute, Explainer: Immigrants and the U.S. Economy, October 2024

U.S. Census Bureau, New 2024 Population Estimates Show Nation’s Population Grew by About 1% to 340.1 Million Since 2023, Dec. 19, 2024

Congressional Research Service, The Changing Demographic Profile of the United States, March 31, 2011

Britannica, Great Depression, accessed Aug. 7, 2025

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, INS Records for 1930s Mexican Repatriations, accessed Aug. 7, 2025

Immigration History, ​Mexican Repatriation (1929-1936), accessed Aug. 7, 2025

History, The Deportation Campaigns of the Great Depression, May 27, 2025

U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, "Repatriation" of Mexican Americans and Mexican nationals continues, accessed Aug. 7, 2025

Journal of Public Economics, The labor market effects of Mexican repatriations: Longitudinal evidence from the 1930s, January 2022

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Real Estate, Send Them Back? The Real Estate Consequences of Repatriations, Oct. 24, 2024

American Enterprise Institute, Immigration Policy and Its Macroeconomic Effects in the Second Trump Administration, July 2025

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Nationwide Encounters, accessed Aug. 7, 2025

PolitiFact, Judge delays Trump admin timeline for ending TPS for Haitians, but they still face deportation, July 2, 2025

PolitiFact, How spin and falsehoods propelled Trump's immigration crackdown in his first 100 days, April 28, 2025

PolitiFact, What Trump's first week immigration orders mean in the short and long term, Jan. 24, 2025

The White House, Realigning The United States Refugee Admissions Program, Jan. 20, 2025

U.S. Department of State, Announcement of Expanded Screening and Vetting for Visa Applicants, June 18, 2025

The White House, Restricting The Entry Of Foreign Nationals To Protect The United States From Foreign Terrorists And Other National Security And Public Safety Threats, Jan. 20, 2025

PolitiFact, Trump promised mass deportations. Where does that stand six months into his administration?, July 24, 2025

Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Updated Estimates of Net International Migration, July 17, 2025

U.S. Census Bureau, Census Bureau Improves Methodology to Better Estimate Increase in Net International Migration, Dec. 19, 2024

Morgan Stanley, The Economic Stakes of President Trump’s Immigration Policy, June 13, 2025

Oxford Economics, The post-pandemic immigration surge is over, June 26, 2025

Goldman Sachs, How will declining immigration impact the US economy?, Feb. 20, 2025

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Breaking Down U.S. Population Growth: Migration and Natural Increase, Feb. 06, 2025

Time Magazine, The Trump Administration Claims It Has Achieved Negative Net Migration. Is That True?, Aug. 4, 2025

Barron, U.S. Migration Could Be Negative in 2025. That Has Economic Consequences., July 2, 2025

Fortune, For the first time in 50 years, the U.S. will likely experience negative net migration, shrinking the U.S. workforce—and economic growth by extension, July 15, 2025

The Washington Post, U.S. could lose more immigrants than it gains for first time in 50 years, June 15, 2025

Morgan Stanley, Our economists Michael Gapen and Sam Coffin discuss how a drop in immigration is tightening labor markets, and what that means for the U.S. economic outlook and Fed policy., June 13, 2025

Reuters, US migrant halt may wipe potential job growth, June 24, 2025

Email interview, Michael Clemens, professor in the Department of Economics at George Mason University, Aug. 6, 2025

Email interview, Stan Veuger, senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, Aug. 5, 2025

Email exchange, Abigail Jackson, White House spokesperson, Aug. 6, 2025

Browse the Truth-O-Meter

More by Maria Ramirez Uribe

Trump’s claims of negative net migration are premature. Some analysts say it could happen.

Support independent fact-checking.
Become a member!

In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.

Sign me up