opposedcrow

The attack does 30 damage for each Benched Pokémon
This is technically incorrect, and it's a mistake I made more than once myself. It's 30 damage for each *electric type* Pokemon on your bench (if you look closely, you can see the little lightning bolt icon next to the word "Benched" on the card).

I was wondering why Pikachu would only be dealing 30-60 damage despite having my bench filled. Turns out it was because this was back when I first built my lighting type deck and thus I didn't have a lot of lightning type Pokemon to include, so I had to add in a bunch of colorless Pokemon to make up the difference.

Damn, doing Jacob Wysocki dirty in that opening paragraph. And he was one of my favorite characters! Considering it was his first time in a Dimension 20 campaign, he absolutely killed it.

I was already plenty excited for Daredevil: Born Again, but seeing they got Jon Bernthal back as Punisher is a nice little bonus I certainly wasn't expecting. I'm glad to see it, I remember feeling like Punisher and Daredevil didn't get enough screentime together back during the Netflix series.

In Reply To @User Agreed, I consider The Long Halloween and Dark Victory to be some of my favorite Batman comics, so I was pleasantly surprised to discover The Penguin is basically a slightly reworked version of their crime family-focused plotline.

In Reply To @Pierre_ReDelecto "alleged threats take place against the RC. With no receipts.(That i can find any ways)"

It's not a huge stretch to imagine most of the threats were sent to them directly via DMs/email/etc., and contrary to what you may think, they're not obligated to share those messages/emails just to prove they did indeed get harassed. If your first inclination is to disbelieve them, that's a *you* problem, not a them problem. They don't owe you anything.

I'm seeing a lot of people going with the old "they're just *saying* they got sent death threats to garner sympathy" logic, and it boggles my mind. Why is it so hard to believe them? The incel chuds out there get so irrationally angry at the dumbest stuff (LGBTQ+ folks wanting basic rights, game devs making games starring female protagonists, women simply existing, etc.), I don't doubt for a second that the overwhelming hate and harassment the RC got was very much real.

I feel for the folks who "lost money" through the bans (though I also question the wisdom of treating MtG cards as a sound avenue for investment), but if you think that the bans entitle folks to harass and abuse other living, breathing people who have their own lives, feelings, and families, you need to get off the internet and go see a therapist.

However you feel about Blake Lively and the controversial It Ends With Us press tour, there are more than enough problematic elements about the film itself to recommend steering clear:
Despite its prominent themes of domestic violence and intimate partner abuse, the film doesn't open with any sort of content warnings (apparently because Colleen Hoover considers them to be "spoilers")
The film inaccurately suggests that it's easy for an abuse survivor to leave their abusive relationship once they decide to do so, when in reality it's often one of the most dangerous times for them (abusers tend to react very badly when they feel they're losing the control they so dearly crave)
The film tries to "soften" the male lead's abusive behavior by giving him a tragic and traumatic backstory, reinforcing the "tortured bad boy who needs to be fixed" stereotype
Aside from a brief (and very easy to miss) throwaway bit of text midway through the end credits, the film doesn't really provide any resources for folks who might be experiencing abuse in real life