This is The Poynter Report, your daily guide to the news about news. Subscribe to get it in your inbox every weekday.


Reporting last Thursday on The Atlanta Journal-Constitution’s decision to discontinue its print edition at the end of the year, I had posed some questions by email to president and publisher Andrew Morse. The column posted before he had time to reply, but he did reply.

Here is a lightly edited version of our exchange, which went a few steps further than Thursday’s press release and daily reports.

Rick Edmonds: Why have so few other metros taken this action yet? Any thoughts on whether the pace of getting out of print altogether will pick up? The answer I hear is that Sunday print is still profitable, and print commands a much higher rate with audiences and advertisers. How will you manage that, and what’s the time frame until the lines cross?

Andrew Morse: We made this decision from a position of strength. We’ve invested heavily in our journalism, but also our product experience, analytics and marketing capabilities — which are essential for running a digital business. As a result, we’ve seen substantial growth in digital subscribers and revenue. Now we want to go faster.

This decision will allow the organization to fully focus on the work that will help us do that. This wasn’t a move to cut costs or manage decline.

I can’t speak to why other papers haven’t taken this step, but I hope we can build a model they might follow.

Edmonds: Will the e-edition continue? Do you expect and accept that some print loyalists just won’t follow you over to digital? (Digital e-editions have been an element, partly successful, in our Tampa Bay Times’ transition to two days a week.)

Morse: We will have a product that will resemble our ePaper for subscribers who enjoy a familiar newspaper layout. We think that will be a value to some long-time print subscribers. We do hope our print loyalists will follow us, but we know a subset of them won’t.

Our focus is on long-term digital subscriber growth. To do that requires a different strategy. With respect to the Tampa Bay Times and other great organizations that have reduced print frequency, I believe those decisions are geared towards short-term profit-and-loss rather than long term growth.

Edmonds: Here’s a reason for having some print: I was just hearing again this week from your counterpart at another metro that “the goal of the print product is to serve as a branding vehicle,” even as digital is fast becoming the primary way people get the news. I take that to mean that for all its virtues, digital seems ephemeral by comparison. Anything to that in your view?

Morse: I don’t read that quote the same way. I read it as saying that this publisher notes that digital subscribers are more engaged and that (unfortunately) print has just become a marketing vehicle for the digital product. I do agree with that sentiment.

Our digital subscribers are far more engaged in our product, and I don’t think digital is ephemeral at all if you are producing the right content and building the right products.

I do believe print can have marketing value, but I believe that value is outweighed by the bandwidth and focus created by aligning the entire organization and all of your resources on the journalism and the capabilities to deliver that journalism to audiences most effectively.

Edmonds: By the way, I second your thought that disrupting yourself is hard to do, but sometimes the smart strategy. And some of the above sounds like the excuses the industry was making 25 years ago for dawdling to respond to online classifieds.

Morse: Thanks for the kind words. I agree with your note here entirely. And … there is no time to dawdle anymore. The pace of disruption is accelerating. Dawdling now means that some organizations will not survive this period.

By Rick Edmonds

An AJC columnist’s farewell to print

Patricia Murphy, the Journal-Constitution’s senior political columnist, weighed in Sunday with a particularly graceful piece on the coming change to digital-only (behind a paywall). She seemed to agree with publisher Andrew Morse that dropping print and getting on faster with the digital transition was the right call. She didn’t shy away, though, from noting the regret and nostalgia that come with seeing print go away for good.

She frames that part of her column by recalling growing up in a household where her mother was “cut-cut-cutting” everything from family news to obituaries. Still does. And her dad folded the morning paper into quarters every day and plopped it on the breakfast table. Her mom’s clippings, Murphy wrote, amounted to “an immense family archive of our lives, each scrap of newsprint who we were and that we were here.”

“When I think about the incredibly emotional response I’ve gotten from readers to the news the AJC will stop the print edition of the newspaper at the end of this year,” she continued, “I think it’s that sense of importance that people see slipping away, too, both newspapers’ importance and maybe even their own.”

Much of her work through the years, Murphy wrote, was for digital publications. (Mom printed those out, too.) Her Atlanta gig thus was not just a return to her hometown, but, for a bit longer, a return to appearing in both the old format and the format of the future.

A headline summarizing the piece read, “Dear Mom, one more column for the scrapbook. Stopping the AJC’s print edition is the end of an era, but not the end of the news.”

By Rick Edmonds

A missing explanatory comma in NPR’s Emmett Till story left readers without key historical facts

(Screenshot/X)

I love NPR with my whole heart. But right now, all I can do is shake my head.

On Thursday, NPR reported that 70 years after 14-year-old Emmett Till was kidnapped, tortured, shot and dumped in a river while visiting relatives in Mississippi, the murder weapon will be on display at the Mississippi Civil Rights Museum.

By the weekend, a firestorm erupted on social media. A tweet promoting the story that said Till “was killed by white men because he whistled at a white woman.

That’s not true. The “whistle” claim was perpetuated for decades before his accuser, Carolyn Bryant Donham, admitted to a historian in 2017 that she lied. She died shortly after.

But you wouldn’t know that from the NPR story. (Disclosure: The NPR Public Editor team is housed at Poynter.)

At first, I wondered if something was lost in translation on social media. As an audience editor, I know how tricky it can be to capture nuance in a handful of characters. But the article itself also flattened the history, leaving readers without the crucial context that would have blunted the backlash.

The story quotes Till’s cousin and the last living eyewitness, Wheeler Parker Jr., who says Till “gave her the wolf whistle.”

“‘As they left,’ he says, ‘Till tried to be a jokester, not understanding how dangerous that could be in the Jim Crow South’,” the story reads.  “‘Pretty soon, Mrs. Bryant comes out of the store. And Emmett, being like he was — love to make you laugh — he gave her the wolf whistle.’”

And then the piece moves on.

This is precisely where NPR’s Code Switch team might have urged an explanatory comma — a phrase they coined to describe the contextual framing that helps audiences understand race, history and culture. That comma was missing here. At a time when misinformation spreads like wildfire, reiterating the truth matters. Without it, someone learning about Till for the first time might leave the story believing the whistle actually happened.

So while the internet isn’t always right, I think it got it right this time.

We’re in a precarious moment. Legacy news organizations are fighting for survival while audiences demand sharper, fuller storytelling. NPR owed its readers — and Emmett Till’s legacy — that missing comma.

By TyLisa C. Johnson

Department of Homeland Security proposes limits for visas for foreign journalists

The Department of Homeland Security proposed a new rule limiting the amount of time foreign journalists working in the United States on a media visa can stay in the country.

The visa, known as an I visa, allows journalists working for foreign media companies to travel to and report on events in the U.S. They are generally valid for the duration of the journalist’s work assignment in the country.

Under the new rule, journalists would only be permitted to stay in the country for up to 240 days. At the end of that period, they can then extend their visa for up to 240 more days but no longer than the length of their assignment. Journalists from China would be limited to a 90-day period.

In proposing the rule, President Donald Trump’s administration aims to require foreign journalists to routinely undergo DHS assessments to stay in the U.S. for a longer period of time.

We’re tracking federal actions that affect journalists in our Press Freedom Watch. See what officials are doing, when, and how it could impact press freedom.

By Angela Fu

Media tidbits and links for your review

Today’s newsletter was written by Rick Edmonds, Angela Fu, TyLisa C. Johnson and Ren LaForme.

More resources for journalists

  • Poynter’s prestigious Diversity Leadership Academy has helped over 200 journalists of color advance their careers. Apply today.
  • Deepen your coverage of incarcerated women and women with incarcerated family members and get the chance to apply for one of five $10,000 reporting grants. Enroll now.
  • Master the tools to connect Washington decisions to local stories — essential coverage as the 2026 elections approach. Enroll now.
  • Recognize story opportunities, see gaps and learn new ways to advance health equity. Enroll now.
  • Turn your life story into a memoir in this pioneering virtual workshop led by Poynter’s Director of Craft Kristen Hare, featuring accomplished authors as guest instructors. Enroll now.
  • Journalists of color: Join a free four-day workshop at Poynter’s waterfront campus, where accepted applicants develop the skills needed to become powerful writers. Apply now.
  • Access Poynter’s comprehensive mental health reporting resources.

Have feedback or a tip? Email Poynter senior media writer Tom Jones at tjones@poynter.org.

The Poynter Report is your daily dive into the world of media, packed with the latest news and insights. Get it delivered to your inbox Monday through Friday by signing up here. And don’t forget to tune into our biweekly podcast for even more.

Poynter’s work on behalf of truth and democracy is under threat — but we are charging forward.

This year, millions in contracts have been stripped away by government and tech cuts. Yet every day Poynter equips journalists with free newsroom resources, teaches media literacy and provides independent coverage of the media. Support our mission today.

Donate
Rick Edmonds is media business analyst for the Poynter Institute where he has done research and writing for the last fifteen years. His commentary on…
Rick Edmonds
TyLisa C. Johnson is Poynter’s audience engagement producer. She is an award-winning reporter who previously wrote about social and cultural topics including hunger, libraries and…
TyLisa Johnson
Angela Fu is a reporter for Poynter. She can be reached at afu@poynter.org, on Signal at angelafu.74, on Bluesky @angelanfu.bsky.social and on Twitter @angelanfu.
Angela Fu
Ren LaForme is the Managing Editor of Poynter.org. He was previously Poynter's digital tools reporter, chronicling tools and technology for journalists, and a producer for…
Ren LaForme

More News

Back to News

Comments

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.