Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fix-It Felix Jr. (video game)

Fix-It Felix Jr. (video game)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Suggest a WP:MERGE with Wreck-it Ralph#Marketing as an WP:ATD. The game doesn't meet WP:GNG - as the sources are either trivial mentions (i.e. passing mention in a dissertation), user wikis and blogs (i.e. MobyGames, VideoGameGeek, WE Computers wiki) or unreliable sources (i.e. RetroVideoGamer). The best source here is probably the EFGAMP source. A search didn't find much: a few "this exists and you can play it" news clips - [1][2]. The sum of all of this is insufficient to substantiate the background and content of a promotional tie-in game that apparently had quite a few official and unofficial iterations - the bootleg information is almost certainly irrelevant without better coverage. Welcome any thoughts. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 21:56, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 21:56, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect to Wreck-it Ralph#Marketing. Let's view this a bit more critically beyond notability. Even if this game were notable in it's own right, I'm inclined to believe that this would fail WP:NOPAGE regardless. Fix-It Felix Jr. is pretty much, in principle, inseparable from Wreck-it Ralph. Too much context from the movie would be required to understand it IMO. It's better off saying something on the lines of "physical arcade machines of a playable version of Fix-It Felix Jr. were made to promote the film". That'd be a lot more logical IMO than a standalone page. But all of that aside, I don't think this meetings WP:GNG anyways, so that's just extra reasoning. λ NegativeMP1 22:39, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Wreck-it Ralph#Marketing: per nom and WP:NOPAGE. This is largely inseparable from the movie and does not appear to have enough sigcov for its own article. Unfortunately I don't see a lot of content worth merging either as none of the cited sources are very substantial. MidnightMayhem (talk) 03:20, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per above. Go D. Usopp (talk) 02:17, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]