diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | 0002-e1000e-use-proper-include-guard-name-in-hw.h.patch | 34 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | series | 1 |
2 files changed, 0 insertions, 35 deletions
diff --git a/0002-e1000e-use-proper-include-guard-name-in-hw.h.patch b/0002-e1000e-use-proper-include-guard-name-in-hw.h.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 057c31176ca981..00000000000000 --- a/0002-e1000e-use-proper-include-guard-name-in-hw.h.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,34 +0,0 @@ -From 21ea2795fc39e6f07df72616edc03d4d2caee1fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> -Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 10:55:47 +0100 -Subject: [PATCH 2/2] e1000e: use proper #include guard name in hw.h - -The include guard for the e1000e and e1000 hw.h files are the same, so -add the proper "E" term to the hw.h file for the e1000e driver. - -This resolves some static analyzer warnings, like the one found by the -"lgtm.com" tool. - -Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com> -Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com> -Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> -Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> -Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org -Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> ---- - drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/hw.h | 4 ++-- - 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) - ---- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/hw.h -+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/hw.h -@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ - /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ - /* Copyright(c) 1999 - 2018 Intel Corporation. */ - --#ifndef _E1000_HW_H_ --#define _E1000_HW_H_ -+#ifndef _E1000E_HW_H_ -+#define _E1000E_HW_H_ - - #include "regs.h" - #include "defines.h" @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ # 0001-x86-tools-relocs-add-__printf-attribute-to-die.patch -0002-e1000e-use-proper-include-guard-name-in-hw.h.patch 0001-driver-core-aux-test-code.patch copying.patch 0001-readfile-implement-readfile-syscall.patch |