Rename Copy site to Duplicate site - #3759
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
📊 Performance Test ResultsComparing eaba0aa vs trunk app-size
site-editor
site-startup
Results are median values from multiple test runs. Legend: 🟢 Improvement (faster) | 🔴 Regression (slower) | ⚪ No change (<50ms diff) |
Contributor
|
I agree "Duplicate" is clearer. With "Copy", I don't know if there will be an intermediate step or not. With "Duplicate", I understand that there will be a new copy of the site available straight away |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

How AI was used in this PR
Didn't use
Proposed Changes
NIT Every time I see "Copy site" - I feel confused. Maybe it's personal, but I used to see word "Duplicate" in such cases. And when I see "Copy", I expect to paste it somewhere.

I propose to rename to "Duplicate site".
macOS example:
Testing Instructions
Visual review should suffice