refactor: use mockaiplatformv1 - #13345
lovelace-coder-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
🤖 AI Factory started resolving merge conflicts / rebasing this pull request in a sandbox. Note: We recommend waiting for the 'ready-for-human' label before leaving review comments. Comments added while the system is actively working may be associated with outdated commits once a new commit is pushed, causing them to be ignored. |
1 similar comment
|
🤖 AI Factory started resolving merge conflicts / rebasing this pull request in a sandbox. Note: We recommend waiting for the 'ready-for-human' label before leaving review comments. Comments added while the system is actively working may be associated with outdated commits once a new commit is pushed, causing them to be ignored. |
28373e6 to
086e154
Compare
|
🤖 AI Factory started investigating CI check failures for this pull request. Note: We recommend waiting for the 'ready-for-human' label before leaving review comments. Comments added while the system is actively working may be associated with outdated commits once a new commit is pushed, causing them to be ignored. |
Investigating Validate PR Release Note failureRun: 35670038079 (This report was generated by overseer) |
| if strings.HasPrefix(any.TypeUrl, "type.googleapis.com/google.cloud.aiplatform.v1beta1.") { | ||
| typeUrl := any.TypeUrl | ||
| if strings.Contains(typeUrl, "PipelineJob") || strings.Contains(typeUrl, "TrainingPipeline") || strings.Contains(typeUrl, "FeatureOnlineStore") || strings.Contains(typeUrl, "PersistentResource") { | ||
| if strings.Contains(typeUrl, "PersistentResource") { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why can't use use PersistentResource with mock v1?
|
🤖 AI Factory started addressing review feedback for this pull request. |
|
Hi @acpana, Thanks for the review feedback! The reason To resolve this and address your feedback:
All pre-push validations and (This comment was generated by overseer) |
086e154 to
86d3dad
Compare
|
🤖 AI Factory started investigating CI check failures for this pull request. Note: We recommend waiting for the 'ready-for-human' label before leaving review comments. Comments added while the system is actively working may be associated with outdated commits once a new commit is pushed, causing them to be ignored. |
86d3dad to
cd6f2bf
Compare
Investigating tests-e2e-fixtures-aiplatform failureRun: 35681637755
Action Taken:
Investigating presubmit-gatekeeper failureRun: 35681637755 (This report was generated by overseer) |
|
🤖 AI Factory started investigating CI check failures for this pull request. Note: We recommend waiting for the 'ready-for-human' label before leaving review comments. Comments added while the system is actively working may be associated with outdated commits once a new commit is pushed, causing them to be ignored. |
1 similar comment
|
🤖 AI Factory started investigating CI check failures for this pull request. Note: We recommend waiting for the 'ready-for-human' label before leaving review comments. Comments added while the system is actively working may be associated with outdated commits once a new commit is pushed, causing them to be ignored. |
92bb911 to
2233e63
Compare
Investigating tests-e2e-fixtures-aiplatform failureRun: 35686347062 Investigating presubmit-gatekeeper failureRun: 35686347062 (This report was generated by overseer) |
|
🤖 AI Factory started investigating CI check failures for this pull request. Note: We recommend waiting for the 'ready-for-human' label before leaving review comments. Comments added while the system is actively working may be associated with outdated commits once a new commit is pushed, causing them to be ignored. |
2 similar comments
|
🤖 AI Factory started investigating CI check failures for this pull request. Note: We recommend waiting for the 'ready-for-human' label before leaving review comments. Comments added while the system is actively working may be associated with outdated commits once a new commit is pushed, causing them to be ignored. |
|
🤖 AI Factory started investigating CI check failures for this pull request. Note: We recommend waiting for the 'ready-for-human' label before leaving review comments. Comments added while the system is actively working may be associated with outdated commits once a new commit is pushed, causing them to be ignored. |
2233e63 to
60288b0
Compare
Investigating unit-tests-4-of-4 failureRun: 35697916600 Investigating presubmit-gatekeeper failureRun: 35697916600 (This report was generated by overseer) |
|
🤖 AI Factory started investigating CI check failures for this pull request. Note: We recommend waiting for the 'ready-for-human' label before leaving review comments. Comments added while the system is actively working may be associated with outdated commits once a new commit is pushed, causing them to be ignored. |
|
🤖 AI Factory started resolving merge conflicts / rebasing this pull request in a sandbox. Note: We recommend waiting for the 'ready-for-human' label before leaving review comments. Comments added while the system is actively working may be associated with outdated commits once a new commit is pushed, causing them to be ignored. |
83abd14 to
152f60e
Compare
|
🤖 AI Factory started investigating CI check failures for this pull request. Note: We recommend waiting for the 'ready-for-human' label before leaving review comments. Comments added while the system is actively working may be associated with outdated commits once a new commit is pushed, causing them to be ignored. |
1 similar comment
|
🤖 AI Factory started investigating CI check failures for this pull request. Note: We recommend waiting for the 'ready-for-human' label before leaving review comments. Comments added while the system is actively working may be associated with outdated commits once a new commit is pushed, causing them to be ignored. |
152f60e to
41874e6
Compare
Investigating tests-e2e-fixtures-aiplatform failureRun: 35795659806 Investigating presubmit-gatekeeper failureRun: 35795659806 (This report was generated by overseer) |
|
🤖 AI Factory started investigating CI check failures for this pull request. Note: We recommend waiting for the 'ready-for-human' label before leaving review comments. Comments added while the system is actively working may be associated with outdated commits once a new commit is pushed, causing them to be ignored. |
Investigating tests-e2e-fixtures-recaptchaenterprise failureRun: 35808200344 Investigating presubmit-gatekeeper failureRun: 35808200344 (This report was generated by overseer) |
|
🤖 AI Factory started resolving merge conflicts / rebasing this pull request in a sandbox. Note: We recommend waiting for the 'ready-for-human' label before leaving review comments. Comments added while the system is actively working may be associated with outdated commits once a new commit is pushed, causing them to be ignored. |
41874e6 to
eeecf29
Compare
|
🤖 AI Factory started investigating CI check failures for this pull request. Note: We recommend waiting for the 'ready-for-human' label before leaving review comments. Comments added while the system is actively working may be associated with outdated commits once a new commit is pushed, causing them to be ignored. |
eeecf29 to
1587310
Compare
Investigating tests-e2e-fixtures-container-2-of-2 failureRun: 37087301123 (This report was generated by overseer) |
|
🤖 AI Factory started investigating CI check failures for this pull request. Note: We recommend waiting for the 'ready-for-human' label before leaving review comments. Comments added while the system is actively working may be associated with outdated commits once a new commit is pushed, causing them to be ignored. |
Investigating tests-e2e-fixtures-compute-3-of-4 failureRun: 37091182059 Investigating presubmit-gatekeeper failureRun: 37091182059 (This report was generated by overseer) |
This PR refactors the mockGCP layer for AIPlatform resources to use the
v1proto natively instead of translating fromv1beta1tov1in themockgcp/common/operations.gopackage.We introduce the
mockaiplatformv1package which implementsFeatureOnlineStoreAdminService,PipelineService, andModelServiceusing the officialapiv1proto definitions.Fixes #13344
Explicitly, this PR was generated by the overseer,overseer agent (powered by the gemini-3.7-flash model).
Does this PR add something which needs to be 'release noted'?