Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 7, 2025. It is now read-only.

Changed PatchAdversarialLoss to allow for least-squares criterion to …#262

Merged
Warvito merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
255-patchadversarialloss-give-the-choice-when-using-least-squares-of-not-having-an-activation-layer
Feb 16, 2023
Merged

Changed PatchAdversarialLoss to allow for least-squares criterion to …#262
Warvito merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
255-patchadversarialloss-give-the-choice-when-using-least-squares-of-not-having-an-activation-layer

Conversation

@virginiafdez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

…not have a leaky RELU activation layer.

Added flag
The default activation layer will be LeakyReLU.

@Warvito Warvito left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, could you please just run ./runtests.sh --autofix to fix the format issues before we merge

@Warvito Warvito merged commit a6b57d5 into main Feb 16, 2023
@Warvito Warvito deleted the 255-patchadversarialloss-give-the-choice-when-using-least-squares-of-not-having-an-activation-layer branch February 16, 2023 13:55
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

2 participants