Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 3, 2023. It is now read-only.

Conversation

jyn514
Copy link
Contributor

@jyn514 jyn514 commented Jul 22, 2021

It was almost exactly the same as the struct initializer, and it added a lot of
boilerplate. To avoid repeating the filesystem_to_path code everywhere, this
changes script_name() to load the name on-demand.

This builds on #2009 and should not be merged before.

@jyn514 jyn514 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 22, 2021 22:15
@jyn514 jyn514 force-pushed the jnelson/remove-assets-new branch 2 times, most recently from cfff041 to 4809583 Compare July 22, 2021 22:28
@kentonv
Copy link
Member

kentonv commented Jul 23, 2021

I did a squash-and-merge on my PR (figured my little fixups didn't belong in the history), so you'll have to rebase this.

@jyn514 jyn514 force-pushed the jnelson/remove-assets-new branch from 4809583 to ec48eff Compare July 23, 2021 15:13
@jyn514
Copy link
Contributor Author

jyn514 commented Jul 23, 2021

Sure thing, done.

@jyn514 jyn514 force-pushed the jnelson/remove-assets-new branch from ec48eff to aaac446 Compare July 26, 2021 17:34
It was almost exactly the same as the struct initializer, and it added a lot of
boilerplate. To avoid repeating the `filesystem_to_path` code everywhere, this
changes `script_name()` to load the name on-demand.
@jyn514 jyn514 force-pushed the jnelson/remove-assets-new branch from aaac446 to 876ab8f Compare July 26, 2021 17:35
@jyn514 jyn514 merged commit 9710ea0 into master Jul 26, 2021
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the jnelson/remove-assets-new branch July 26, 2021 17:53
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

3 participants