Not only 😉 in support of the Gatsby t-shirt design contest, I would like to make an effort to settle on a logo definition for the Gatsby brand (starting the "Gatsby Brand Guidelines" I guess).

Ideally, this would eventually result in a section on gatsbyjs.org offering downloads and usage instructions.

Motivation

Seeing the t-shirt mockups by @rdela using the original logo design by @SachaG I felt that for the t-shirt design, the logotype could be a little bigger. On the second look, I started wondering about the logomark font weight. I took another look at gatsbyjs.org – there we use "Futura PT Demi" for the logomark, a heavier weight than what is used in the "OGatsby" version. A little OCD kicked in. 😄 😉

A bit of research

So I started to trace back:

• Here's the aforementioned initial logo design by @SachaG:
  • 
  • The logotype is set in "Futura Bold" according to @SachaG, but I think it's the "Medium" weight (that's also used in the Figma mockups of the homepage, see below).
  • Logomark SVGs from Gatsby logo/branding #408 (comment):
    • https://cl.ly/hbTv - positive logomark.
    • https://cl.ly/hbjr - negative logomark.
• Current gatsbyjs.org colors are coming from @SachaG's Gatsby Figma board:
  • The latter is first mentioned here: [1.0] New design + new home page 🎉 #1170 (comment)
  • Logomark fill: #744C9E.
  • Brighter stripe in masthead background: #9D7CBF.
  • The logomark is set in "Futura Medium".
  • Archie Hicklin's suggested palette refresh: [1.0] Discuss next steps on gatsbyjs.org design #1173 (comment)
  • Sidenote: The logomark used as the Twitter profile image has a different fill: #5b2b63. The https://opencollective.com/gatsby has another one: #623F93.

Status Quo and personal opinion

The current gatsbyjs.org uses Futura PT, more specifically @KyleAMathews bought the "Book" and "Demi" cuts plus their italic versions. Futura PT Demi is used to substitute "Futura Medium" from @SachaG's designs.

I like the bolder logotype (compared to the "OGatsby" version using "Futura Medium").
I think there's a little too much whitespace in between the gatsbyjs.org logomark and -type.

First shots at a logo definition

Based on the current gatsbyjs.org logo version, I somehow managed to squeeze the current logo into an old brand guideline I found in my (digital) crates. The clearance space currently is defined a little weirdly by cap height minus x-height. I haven't actually validated how well the current definition works and want to take a look at using the logomark x-height as a base for the Clear Space instead and probably get rid of the "Safe Zone".

I held back from really tightening the screws, so a few things are a bit off still – but things are lining up quite nicely already. The whitespace between mark and type are reduced. I think the logomark/-type balance works better when compared to the "OGatsby" version.

What's your opinion? How do you feel about "Futura Medium" vs. "Futura PT Demi"?