fix: #226 Support default response status#271
Open
ad-walker wants to merge 3 commits into
Open
Conversation
- Minor change to use `default` if specific status code is not found is not found in responses - Updated tests and error messages - Incremented port number of exampleApp to 5001 to avoid UPNP conflicts
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #271 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 17 17
Lines 418 419 +1
Branches 63 65 +2
=========================================
+ Hits 418 419 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue/feature request: #226
defaultresponse status when provided will catch unspecified response codescc: @rwalle61 based on comments re: original issue