Skip to content

Subdomain now uses php logo font. - #1

Open
kadet1090 wants to merge 3 commits into
php:masterfrom
kadet1090:master
Open

Subdomain now uses php logo font.#1
kadet1090 wants to merge 3 commits into
php:masterfrom
kadet1090:master

Conversation

@kadet1090

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Subdomain title on header now uses font from PHP logo (Handel Gothic - Included as webfont).
2014-06-09_20-07-25

@bjori

bjori commented Jun 9, 2014

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Isn't there a licensing issue using that font?
Do you know how that works? Whom can we request permission to use it?

I really like the idea btw.

@Sobak

Sobak commented Jun 9, 2014

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It would be a problem if the font has licensing restrictions because as far as I can see we're using this font in our logo already. I also fully supports this change, it looks better than now.

@kadet1090

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Font is licensed but as Sobak said, it is already used in PHP logo, so I assume that php group owns rights to use it.

@salathe

salathe commented Jun 9, 2014

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Having a license to use a font in the creation of a logo is an entirely different thing to distributing the font files on the web.

Could you include the LICENSE file that you got with this font to ensure that we are indeed allowed to use these files?

@kadet1090

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

In that case it would be just better (and easier :D) to use some similar but open font. Ubuntu looks quite good in my opinion:
2014-06-09_23-13-03
I've already commited changes.

@bjori

bjori commented Jun 9, 2014

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I'd prefer to stick with Handel Gothic and figure out the licensing issue.

@salathe

salathe commented Jun 9, 2014

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Licensing one of the Handel Gothic's as a web font is likely going to be prohibitively expensive. Most providers provide a license based on a number of page views, which for php.net is going to be… a lot.

For example; fonts.com would be £35/mo limited to 1,000,000 page views (with a wide font range). myfonts.com is £92.51 for 1,000,000 page views. The latter is just for one style within the family (ITC Handel Gothic Std Medium)! Lots of places won't even offer a license for hosting the files ourselves.

Unless we can come to an agreement with one of the providers, it will be much more cost-effective to skip the web font approach and create images (I like SVG) as needed. "Desktop" licensing is far, far less expensive.

I admit, it would be nice to have the sub-site names matching, or at least fitting very neatly with, the PHP logo. I'm totally open to suggestion!

@bjori

bjori commented Jun 9, 2014

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Surely someone created the font and we could license it directly rather then a middleman?
I don't quite understand how the whole font licensing works, which is why I'm asking :)

Are there two players that own it and can license it at will at any price they so choose?

@Bilge

Bilge commented Aug 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Congratulations on your 10 year anniversary.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

5 participants