Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 6, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
google-auth >=2.40.0,<2.43 -> >=2.40.0,<2.44 age confidence

Release Notes

googleapis/google-auth-library-python (google-auth)

v2.43.0

Compare Source

Features
  • Add public wrapper for _mtls_helper.check_use_client_cert which enables mTLS if GOOGLE_API_USE_CLIENT_CERTIFICATE is not set, when the MWID/X.509 cert sources detected (#​1859) Add public wrapper for check_use_client_cert which enables mTLS if
    GOOGLE_API_USE_CLIENT_CERTIFICATE is not set, when the MWID/X.509 cert
    sources detected. Also, fix check_use_client_cert to return boolean
    value.
    Change #​1848 added the check_use_client_cert method that helps know if
    client cert should be used for mTLS connection. However, that was in a
    private class, thus, created a public wrapper of the same function so
    that it can be used by python Client Libraries. Also, updated
    check_use_client_cert to return a boolean value instead of existing
    string value for better readability and future scope.
    --------- (1535eccbff0ad8f3fd6a9775316ac8b77dca66ba)
  • Enable mTLS if GOOGLE_API_USE_CLIENT_CERTIFICATE is not set, if the MWID/X.509 cert sources detected (#​1848) The Python SDK will use a hybrid approach for mTLS enablement:
  • If the GOOGLE_API_USE_CLIENT_CERTIFICATE environment variable is set
    (either true or false), the SDK will respect that setting. This is
    necessary for test scenarios and users who need to explicitly control
    mTLS behavior.
  • If the GOOGLE_API_USE_CLIENT_CERTIFICATE environment variable is not
    set, the SDK will automatically enable mTLS only if it detects Managed
    Workload Identity (MWID) or X.509 Workforce Identity Federation (WIF)
    certificate sources. In other cases where the variable is not set, mTLS
    will remain disabled.
    ** This change also adds the helper method check_use_client_cert and
    it's unit test, which will be used for checking the criteria for setting
    the mTLS to true
    ** This change is only for Auth-Library, other changes will be created
    for Client-Library use-cases.
    --------- (395e405b64b56ddb82ee639958c2e8056ad2e82b)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (squash) November 6, 2025 03:06
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 6, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.12%. Comparing base (968890e) to head (69126ab).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1397   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.12%   78.12%           
=======================================
  Files         353      353           
  Lines       11080    11080           
  Branches      505      505           
=======================================
  Hits         8656     8656           
  Misses       2245     2245           
  Partials      179      179           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 78.12% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
@renovate renovate bot merged commit 0905117 into master Nov 6, 2025
26 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/google-auth-2.x branch November 6, 2025 03:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

1 participant