Skip to content

Fix Typos and Improve Documentation Consistency #143365

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

zeevick10
Copy link


Description:
This pull request addresses several minor typos and improves consistency across documentation files.

  • Corrects spelling mistakes (e.g., "completley" → "completely", "practies" → "practise").
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 3, 2025

r? @oli-obk

rustbot has assigned @oli-obk.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added A-rustc-dev-guide Area: rustc-dev-guide S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 3, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 3, 2025

The rustc-dev-guide subtree was changed. If this PR only touches the dev guide consider submitting a PR directly to rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide otherwise thank you for updating the dev guide with your changes.

cc @BoxyUwU, @jieyouxu, @Kobzol, @tshepang

@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

We do not accept typo-fix PRs on internal-facing docs.

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-rustc-dev-guide Area: rustc-dev-guide T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
4 participants