Skip to content

Conversation

@hjxilinx
Copy link
Contributor

Description

fix(gpt): fix the stack smashing due to long error messsges and do some refactor.

Checklist

Please check the items in the checklist if applicable.

  • Is the user manual updated?
  • Are the test cases passed and automated?
  • Is there no significant decrease in test coverage?
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @hjxilinx, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily focuses on improving the robustness and error handling within the system. It resolves a potential stack smashing issue in the error message parsing logic by switching to dynamic memory allocation, and refines error classification for model loading failures. Additionally, it includes a minor refactoring in the Python-based autoencoder to standardize exception handling.

Highlights

  • Memory Safety: Addressed a potential stack smashing vulnerability in the parseErrorMsgFromAnalyticServer function by dynamically allocating memory for error messages instead of using a fixed-size buffer, ensuring proper handling of long error strings.
  • Error Handling Improvement: Enhanced error message parsing in executil.c to specifically identify and handle "failed to load model" scenarios, mapping them to the TSDB_CODE_ANA_ALGO_NOT_LOAD error code.
  • Code Refactoring: Streamlined error handling in autoencoder.py by replacing a direct FileNotFoundError with a dedicated failed_load_model_except helper function for consistent exception reporting.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request fixes a critical stack smashing vulnerability in parseErrorMsgFromAnalyticServer by replacing a fixed-size stack buffer with dynamic memory allocation using tjsonDupStringValue. This is a significant improvement for security and stability. The changes also include refactoring in Python to raise a more specific error when a model fails to load, which is then handled by the C code. My review includes a critical fix to prevent a potential null pointer dereference in the C code if the JSON message is null.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

2 participants