Skip to content

Should Endpoint Discovery documentation match Webmention spec? #112

Open
@jgarber623

Description

@jgarber623

Hello!

In a conversation in IndieWeb IRC (in the dev channel) regarding the differences between the Webmention spec's endpoint discovery algorithm and the Micropub spec's endpoint discovery algorithm, @sknebel noted:

in practice, those are identical, the micropub one is just documented a lot less detailed

I tend to agree that that should be the case. I don't have the historical context for why the two specs might differ as written (vs. how implementors are implementing…) so I can't comment on that.

But… given the generalized nature of "endpoint discovery" and the common means by which website's supply this information (e.g. a <link> element, a Link HTTP header, an <a> element) it may be a good idea to bring the various specs into alignment.

So, should this section of the Micropub spec be updated to match Webmention's endpoint discovery documentation?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions