Skip to content

[css-anchor-position] anchor() Fallback type inconsistency vs WPT #10831

Open
@dshin-moz

Description

@dshin-moz

For the anchor() function's optional fallback value, the spec text specifies <length-percentage>, but the corresponding WPT, anchor-parse-valid.html, considers the use of anchor() function itself to be valid, seemingly contradicting the spec text.

It seems to me that both the spec and the test were initially committed this way - Which one is correct?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    Status

    Regular agenda items

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions