Competitive Analysis For Retailers

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

  • View profile for Itamar Novick

    First check to AI founders | Pre-Seed/Seed @ Recursive Ventures

    53,411 followers

    "Our competitor just raised $180M and launched our exact product." The founder looked defeated. His team wanted to panic-match every feature. Instead, he did the opposite: He cut features and went smaller. 18 months later, the competitor burned through $180M and shut down. His "small" startup? $50M ARR, profitable, growing 100% YoY. Here's what happened: - The overfunded competitor tried to serve everyone: solopreneurs to Fortune 500. Built 100+ features. - Massive team. - Huge burn. My founder cut from 15 features to 5. Focused entirely on one segment: mid-market e-commerce brands. The math that matters: - Overfunded competitor needs $100M+ ARR to satisfy investors. - Small startup needs $10M ARR to win. Completely different games. - The incumbent tries to do everything. - The startup does one thing exceptionally well for one specific customer. One founder I backed faced a competitor with $100M in funding. His team panicked: "We need AI agents, workflow automation, integrations, mobile apps..." He cut features instead. Doubled down on one vertical. Result: Competitor dead. His company thriving. What to do when competitors raise huge rounds: Don't add features. Cut them. Don't go broader. Go narrower. Don't outspend them. Out-focus them. Don't beat them everywhere. Own one segment completely. Your biggest advantage isn't money. It's focus. Next time your competitor raises $100M, don't panic. Double down on the one thing you do better than anyone. #StartupStrategy #Competition #Focus

  • View profile for Mike Soutar
    Mike Soutar Mike Soutar is an Influencer

    LinkedIn Top Voice on business transformation and leadership. Mike’s passion is supporting the next generation of founders and CEOs.

    47,098 followers

    “It’s not enough to just win,” an old boss of mine used to explain. “The other side has to lose, badly.” Nothing gave him more satisfaction than eating his rivals’ lunch - and his competitive nature was contagious. When I started my first business I adopted his approach. But I soon also learned that I had to ally that competitive spirit with a more nuanced approach if I was to retain clients rather than just churn through them. Unlike winning deals, retention isn't just about having the best product — it's about creating value and a level of reliability that rivals can't match. 1. Retain on value, not price: Competitors will use price to try and attract your customers. It’s tempting to drop your yield accordingly, but that’s a race to the bottom. Instead take time to make sure your client can see how much they get for every pound or dollar they invest. Adding extra value will always be more profitable than reducing your fee. 2. Add features before you’re asked to: Write a customer engagement strategy that involves adding useful new services or features for your existing customers at least once or twice a year. Use these to upsell, build loyalty and increase their pain of moving suppliers. 3. Build trust through relentless delivery: Unreliability is one of the top reasons clients will look elsewhere. Meet key clients on a regular basis to understand how their needs are evolving and pivot your offering accordingly. And always keep your promises. 4. Outmanoeuvre your competitors: Never underestimate how determined your competitors will be to knock you off your perch. Devote adequate time to learning from their approach so you know the threat you face. Match your instinct to win new business with an equal determination to retain customers. Crack that and not only will you eat your competitors’ lunch today but you’ll have it every day.

  • View profile for Martin McAndrew

    A CMO & CEO. Dedicated to driving growth and promoting innovative marketing for businesses with bold goals

    14,462 followers

    A new ad placement looks like growth. It’s usually just more runway. When an airport builds a new runway, airlines gain more flight capacity. That does not increase profit. It increases potential supply. Empty seats still burn fuel. Airlines don’t obsess over runway count. They obsess over yield per seat. Because capacity without profitable demand destroys margin. Retail has the same problem with media. Every new placement promises: • Lower CPMs • Early-mover advantage • Incremental reach But reach is infrastructure. Profit comes from yield. If the signal inside that placement is weak: • Traffic converts below blended average • Discounts increase to compensate • Contribution erodes quietly • CAC drifts away from LTV Cheap attention with poor signal is the equivalent of flying half-full planes. It looks active. It looks expanded. It looks like scale. But yield tells the truth. Strong retail teams don’t chase new surfaces. They ask: • Is the intent commercially useful? • Does this improve contribution per order? • Does it expand profitable demand or dilute it? • Can our measurement model actually read the impact? Platforms measure inventory growth. Retailers must measure margin growth. New placements are runway. Signal quality determines yield. And yield determines profit. #retailmarketing #ecommerce #performancemarketing #growthstrategy #decisionmaking #digitalmaturity #retailstrategy

  • View profile for Vikas Chawla
    Vikas Chawla Vikas Chawla is an Influencer

    Helping large consumer brands drive business outcomes via Digital & Al. A Founder, Author, Angel Investor, Speaker & Linkedin Top Voice

    64,020 followers

    You can get your biggest competitor's entire marketing strategy without paying a single rupee (and 95% of CMOs and founders are ignoring them). During a strategy session with a large consumer brand last month, we discovered they had limited visibility into their competitors' paid marketing tactics. So, our agency did 30 minutes of research and instantly compiled a comprehensive analysis of their top 3 competitors' advertising approaches. There are no insider secrets, just Google, Meta, and LinkedIn ad libraries. In minutes, we had access to: > What messaging their competitors are using > Which platforms are being prioritized > How long campaigns have been running The result? In just a few months, their engagement outperformed even their biggest competitor.   Rather than just scrolling through the ad libraries, we decoded them using our 3-point competitive intelligence framework: 📍Core value propositions: What specific promises did the competitors make repeatedly? When Mamaearth consistently highlighted "toxin-free" in the majority of their ads which worked in their favor (ad spends of 31% from sales), we knew it was driving conversions, so we positioned our client with "clean and clinically proven." 📍Creative patterns: Which visuals did the competitors reuse? Many skincare brands run UGC-style before/after testimonials on Instagram to tap into their communities and build trust, but studio-shot product features on Google - telling us exactly which creative approach worked on each platform. 📍Funnel architecture: How do competitors move people from awareness to purchase? We noticed that brands like Two Brothers are leveraging their Founders even in paid ads to build top-of-the-mind awareness. Hence we implemented product-specific retargeting for our client to guide users from awareness to repeat purchase. See, Ad libraries exist to understand what your competitors are doubling down on so you can find your edge. Leverage it well. We are in fact now building an AI Agent to just do this. Have you recently checked out the ad libraries? #MarketingStrategy #CompetitorResearch

  • View profile for Jesper Lowgren

    Agentic Enterprise Architecture Lead @ DXC Technology | AI Architecture, Design, and Governance.

    13,690 followers

    What tool sets Architects apart? In the fast-paced world of Enterprise and Technology Architecture, clarity isn't just beneficial—it's indispensable. Architects often juggle numerous priorities, complex systems, and ambitious strategic goals. But how can we bridge the present realities and future aspirations of an organization seamlessly and efficiently? Enter the GAP Analysis. 🌉 It is easy to underestimate the power of a GAP Analysis. Yet it is precisely this step that can turn ambiguity into clarity and aspirations into actionable roadmaps. Consider the typical journey: You start with a Current State Analysis. This vital first step establishes a factual baseline—a clear-eyed, unbiased view of where your organization stands today. 📍 Without this grounded perspective, any strategy risks being disconnected from reality. Next comes the Future State Analysis, a compelling vision aligned closely with strategic ambitions. This vision is your north star 🌟, the target state that drives alignment, investment, and enthusiasm within your teams. Yet, despite having a clear current state and an inspiring future state, organizations often stall. They face the daunting question: "How exactly do we get there?" 🤔 This is where the GAP Analysis shines. The GAP Analysis is not just about identifying differences—it's about uncovering hidden opportunities and strategic insights. It answers critical questions: 🆕 What capabilities do we need to enhance or develop? ⏹️ What obstacles are preventing us from reaching our envisioned future? ➡️ Where are the quick wins, and where should we invest for long-term impact? As architects, using GAP Analysis means taking a proactive role, turning what might otherwise be perceived as gaps or shortcomings into strategic levers. This analytical technique becomes a bridge, transforming aspiration into achievable steps, clarity into strategy, and ultimately, strategy into execution. And finally, armed with these insights, creating your Roadmap becomes not just simpler, but far more impactful. Each initiative on your roadmap now clearly connects current realities with future possibilities, powered by insightful GAP Analysis findings. 🚀 In short, GAP Analysis is not merely a technical step—it's an essential strategic practice. It elevates the role of the architect, positioning you not just as a passive analyst, but as an active shaper of your organization's future. Have you leveraged GAP Analysis recently in your organization or architecture practice? I'd love to hear your experiences and thoughts in the comments below. 💬 #enterprisearchitcture #enterprisearchitecture40 #GAPanalysis

  • View profile for Mert Damlapinar
    Mert Damlapinar Mert Damlapinar is an Influencer

    Leading AI Strategy and Digital Commerce for CPG Growth | AI, data analytics and retail media products, P&L growth | VP, SVP | Fmr. L’Oreal, PepsiCo, Mondelez, EPAM | Keynote speaker, author, sailor, runner

    58,239 followers

    Most food brands still say retail media is “important.” But the 2026 data says something else: If you’re still treating retail media like a test budget, you’re already behind. We just released our 2026 Global Retail Media Budget Allocation Benchmarks report, based on inputs from 305 digital commerce, retail media, and marketing executives across 41 global brands. And the Food & Beverage numbers jumped out immediately: 📍Retail media now accounts for 8% to 26% of total ad spend in Food & Beverage, with an average of 17% in 2026. That’s up sharply from 12% in 2025. 📍As a % of net revenue, allocation now ranges from 0.7% to 6.8%, with an average of 3.2%, up from 3.0% last year. 📍The U.S. is still playing a different game: highest observed levels hit 26% of total ad spend and 6.8% of net revenue. 💥 Meanwhile, the low end of Europe sits at 8% of ad spend and 0.7% of net revenue. That gap is not just a benchmark difference. - It is a capability gap. - A mindset gap. - And in many companies, a leadership gap. Retail media is no longer a sideline item owned by one team with a dashboard and a prayer. It is becoming one of the clearest signals of whether a food brand actually understands how modern commerce works. A few blunt takeaways for FMCG leaders: 1. Search-only retail media is not a strategy. If you’re not building full-funnel plans across onsite, offsite, display, video, and seasonal moments, you’re underplaying the channel. 2. ROAS is not enough anymore. The next budget unlock comes from proving incrementality, not just harvesting demand that already exists. 3. One global playbook is lazy. Market maturity, retailer capability, and shopper behavior vary too much. Your investment model should, too. 4. Retail media is now a commercial growth lever, not a media experiment. The brands winning here are not just spending more. They’re operating better. Download link for the full report in comments. 👇 𝗧𝗼 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄 ecommert® 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗷𝗼𝗶𝗻 𝟭𝟵,𝟯𝟬𝟬+ 𝗖𝗣𝗚, 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗹, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵 𝗲𝘅𝗲𝗰𝘂𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘀𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗿𝘁® : 𝗖𝗣𝗚 𝗗𝗶𝗴𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹 𝗚𝗿𝗼𝘄𝘁𝗵 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿. PepsiCo The Coca-Cola Company Mondelēz International Danone Ferrero Mars Nestlé Procter & Gamble Unilever Kraft Heinz General Mills Post Consumer Brands The Hain Celestial Group Kellanova Kellogg Company JDE Peet's Starbucks Chobani The Hershey Company Coca-Cola Europacific Partners Coca-Cola FEMSA pladis Global Lindt & Sprüngli Ghirardelli Chocolate Company Russell Stover Chocolates Bimbo Bakeries USA Tyson Foods

  • Yesterday, Amazon Ads dropped TWO announcements that are about to change retail media strategy. 1) Amazon Marketing Cloud is now self-service This is HUGE. Until now, AMC's sophisticated capabilities were locked behind barriers. You needed technical expertise, SQL knowledge, the whole thing. Not anymore. Any advertiser can now access these insights through intuitive, no-code templates with AI assistance. You can finally connect AMC learnings across your entire retail media strategy. Budget shifts, audience adjustments, keyword targeting, all of it unified in one place. 2) Creative and media activation are no longer separate. Amazon is rolling out integrated creative tools for Sponsored Brands, DSP, and more, so you can build, launch, and measure creative in one workflow. That means less lag time between concept and execution, as well as the ability to measure creative performance against campaign results in real time. The bigger picture is clear. Amazon just set the new standard for what retail media should look like.

  • View profile for Jeffrey Cohen
    Jeffrey Cohen Jeffrey Cohen is an Influencer

    Chief Business Development Officer at Skai | Ex-Amazon Ads Tech Evangelist | Commerce Media Thought Leader

    28,391 followers

    During my four years at Amazon Ads, one thing brands could never get enough of was benchmark data. March 2026 just delivered a massive efficiency breakthrough: Google ROI surged +291% (from 4.23 to 16.55) while Walmart Connect Onsite Display ROI exploded by +166%. I can’t wait to see what the Q1 numbers look like. Retail media continues to drive significant results, but performance is concentrated in a few top channels. The gap between these high-efficiency channels and where most teams are still allocating budget is widening. Here's what the data is actually telling you: Retail media has become the primary growth driver. In CPG and Food & Beverage, Amazon Search and Instacart conversion growth is running +30% to +100%+ YoY. Walmart Search is up +59%. This reflects a true structural shift, not outliers. Reallocating budget is answer. Several channels in this benchmark show the same pattern: spend up, clicks up, conversions flat or down. This indicates low ROI despite higher engagement.. The brands winning right now are moving budget toward proven efficiency breakout channels, not simply adding investment across the board. Last year’s channel mix is already wrong. If you're still running the same allocation you built in 2025, the data says you're behind. Google (16.55 ROI), Walmart Onsite Display (19.34 ROI), and MSN (10.50 ROI) are pulling away. Low-ROI, high-click-volume channels are pulling in the opposite direction. Three things worth acting on now: Scale what's working. Double down on Google and ADSP. Google’s 291% ROI surge shows massive intent momentum, while ADSP CPCs improved by 55%, proving offsite efficiency is scaling. Cut the false growth. Social media is currently the False Growth trap, as CPCs dropped 20%, but ROI remained flat at 0.43. It's efficiency without effectiveness. Capitalize on the Local explosion. Local channel ROI grew from 1.73 to 90.07 this month. If your brand has a physical footprint, the window to move efficiently is now. Join Josh Dreller (Skai) and Kelly Gerrard (Marshall Associates) on April 23 for an in-depth look at Q1 digital advertising performance, featuring our exclusive data on retail media, paid search, social, and GenAI-powered marketing.

  • View profile for Ahmed Khairy
    Ahmed Khairy Ahmed Khairy is an Influencer

    CEO at Gameball | Investor | CRM | Loyalty | Retail | Customer Experience

    37,914 followers

    You don’t build loyalty through rewards—you reward customers for already being loyal. Big difference. Loyalty programs are primarily designed for customers who have already demonstrated consistent engagement and loyalty to your brand. The goal isn’t to create loyalty through rewards, but to recognize and strengthen it. By offering rewards, perks, and recognition, you can maximize their lifetime value, whether by increasing purchase frequency, boosting basket size, or encouraging referrals. Tactics like tiered rewards, exclusive access, and personalized incentives help reinforce their commitment and make them feel valued. 𝗦𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗙𝗼𝗰𝘂𝘀:  For customers with the potential to become loyal, the strategy shifts. These customers have shown higher engagement but haven't fully crossed into the loyal customer category. To convert them, 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘇𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 is key. Tailor rewards based on their behaviors and preferences to create a sense of exclusivity and recognition. It’s also crucial to stay top of mind through strategic touchpoints—whether via targeted email campaigns, loyalty app notifications, or personalized offers that speak directly to their interests. Offering a path to higher-tier rewards as they engage more frequently can further motivate them to commit to your brand long-term. 𝗖𝗮𝘀𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝗖𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗿𝘀:  Casual customers require a different approach. They won’t become loyal overnight, and the objective here is gradual nurturing. For this segment, it's all about increasing touchpoints and staying relevant. Broader offers, such as discounts, time-sensitive promotions, or entry-level rewards, help keep them engaged without overwhelming them. The goal is to activate them periodically, ensuring they interact with your brand from time to time. By keeping consistent offers flowing, you maintain visibility, and over time, some of these casual customers may transition into the potential loyal customer segment. ----- Ultimately, loyalty is about retention, not conversion. The focus is on maintaining a strong relationship with those who already support your brand and steadily nurturing others to deepen their commitment over time.

  • View profile for Marcus Chan
    Marcus Chan Marcus Chan is an Influencer

    Missing your number and not sure why? I’ve been in that seat. Ex‑Fortune 500 $195M/yr sales leader helping CROs & VPs of Sales diagnose, find & fix revenue leaks. $950M+ client revenue | WSJ bestselling author

    101,129 followers

    Your best rep converts at 52% while others struggle at 19%. You think it’s a talent issue. Psst… It's not talent. After analyzing 100+ sales teams, I've discovered what's really behind performance gaps. Most revenue leaders assume it's talent and throw money at symptoms: → Implement MEDDIC when only 30% have qualification issues → Hire more reps when the problem is conversion rates → Roll out Challenger when the gap is discovery skills Let me give you some real client examples why it’s not a talent issue 👇 A fintech company spent $280K rebuilding lead generation when the real problem was discovery calls averaging 22 minutes instead of 47 minutes like their top performer. One methodology change fixed it in 30 days. Your top performer hasn't gotten lucky. She's cracked a code others haven't. A cybersecurity company hitting 43% of $28M target. CEO wanted to double from 12 to 24 reps. Our analysis revealed their top performer converted qualified leads at 67% while everyone else averaged 23%. Same territory. Same leads. Same training. The rock star developed a discovery framework that identified economic buyers and quantified business impact within two calls. Everyone else ran generic discovery hoping for the best. We built systematic frameworks based on his approach. Result: $4.2M additional revenue with the same 12-person team. An HR tech’s pipeline looked healthy at $38M. Analysis revealed 71% of opportunities stuck in discovery 60+ days. Proper qualification frameworks dropped pipeline to $22M but closed rate jumped from 23% to 41%. Result: $2.3M more actual revenue. Look. Your team isn't broken. Your reps don't lack potential. You need to systematically identify conversion leaks and install frameworks that address them. Your best rep has already solved your revenue problems. We just help you build frameworks so everyone else can execute like them too. — Get a complete revenue diagnostic here: https://lnkd.in/ghh8VCaf

Explore categories