• ႧႤႧႰႨ ႾႠႰႨ (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello! I formally request the Autopatrolled user right. I'm a regular user of Wikipedia, both in Turkish and English. I have contributed to the Turkish Wikipedia, particularly on the Tao-Klarjeti region. I have also started to transfer these contributions to the English Wikipedia. I think it would be good to reduce the workload involved in reviewing the items I have written. Thank you. --ႧႤႧႰႨ ႾႠႰႨ (talk) 15:32, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

• Aeternus (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have been editing Wikipedia since 2006, have created numerous new articles, edited countless others, and am very familiar with its policies. Λeternus ^(talk) 12:46, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

• Michelangelo1992 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've periodically patrolled Michelangelo1992's articles, and consistently found them to be in good shape. Focused on books as a topic area and very clear familiarity with WP:NBOOK. He's created 135 articles. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 22:56, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

@Michelangelo1992: I'm a little concerned about overly lengthy quotations. Would you commit to summarizing quotations a bit more? Also, see MOS:SAID. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:24, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback! I’ve always trended toward direct quotes to avoid concerns for original research, but I can make an effort to paraphrase more in the future while still citing the original source. I’ll also try to be more mindful of WP:SAID. I thought I was doing fairly well with this, but I am always open to feedback particularly if you have specific suggestions relating to recent articles. Thank you! Michelangelo1992 (talk) 14:37, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

• LightandDark2000 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello. I've had more than 13 years of experience editing Wikipedia, and I've created over 30 articles in that time (not counting redirects and disambigs). I used to have this user right, and I would like to have it back, as I think it would be great to take my page creations off the backlog. I'm going to be doing some more content creation, even if not immediately. I've also written a handful of GAs, so I have a pretty good understanding of WP content policies. Thanks. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 09:13, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

I believe part of the reason the inactivity period was instituted was to ensure the editors reapplying for autopatrolled would continue to demonstrate familiarity with the community's expectations of content, which might have changed since it was previously granted to them. With that said, it might be helpful for the granting administrator to be able to review some of your more recent articles after you've created them, since XTools says your last creation was in 2022. This is very much a passing comment from a non-administrator, however. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:09, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done, I'll do something unorthodox here since there are no recent articles to evaluate here (the last article creation was in 2021 -- and I have no concerns with your previous creations). I'm giving you the AP right until the end Jan 2026, once that period is over, you can re-request the right and admin can evaluate a few recent creations and extend the full right. Sohom (talk) 17:18, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

• Doomsdayer520 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

• Destinyokhiria (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I'd like to start doing more work with stuff like fixing Bare URLs, grammars and AWB would really help. Destinyokhiria 💬 09:17, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:22, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

• Pbritti (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Requesting this perm as someone who has spent the last year incrementally ratcheting up my work with sometimes mind-numbing MOS correcting, maintenance tagging, and short description fixing. To save me time on these, I think the AWB would be a good fit. I have a perfect record of edit summary use from the last 12 months, a clean block log, and a solid grasp of what constitutes appropriate use cases for AWB. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:00, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:21, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

• Smamsmsung (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights:

fixing duplicated citations when transferring edits to a page Smamsmsung (talk) 00:15, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

 Not done Please read the box at the top of the page. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:21, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

• Whenlifegivesyoumapletrees (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I would like to request to be manually confirmed in order to be able to translate pages that aren't in English to English. I am a native speaker of both English and German and have a native level of Spanish. I have experience in translation and made this account because it came to my attention that the page for Laurent Simons [de] does not exist in English Wikipedia. However, in order to translate it from German I need to be confirmed.

Thank you for considering my request. Whenlifegivesyoumapletrees^{(you sit under them)} 17:05, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

 Not done. You need to be extended confirmed, not autoconfirmed to use the translation tool. If you wish to use the tool you will need to reach that userright naturally, but the right you are requesting is the wrong one anyway. CoconutOctopus talk 16:55, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

• Tlfarah (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Reason for requesting confirmed rights I would like to update my father's Wikipedia page to contain more information about his life. Tlfarah (talk) 19:16, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

@Tlfarah: Your request here does not make it clear what page you want to edit, nor why you would need "Confirmed" level permission to edit that page. Most pages do not require this. Also, I strongly suggest that you read WP:COI and properly declare your conflict of interest before proceeding further. - Jmabel | Talk 00:03, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

• Ironmaidenfun (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Reason for request: I am organizing an editathon and would like to use the CampaignEvents extension on English Wikipedia. (You can see my current event page on Meta-Wiki, but I think it would be easier for attendees if I hosted the event page on English Wikipedia instead.)

I have no active blocks, and am WMF staff operating in my volunteer capacity (LDelench_WMF). Thanks for considering me! Ironmaidenfun (talk) 21:19, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request — MusikBot ^talk 21:20, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Confirming that user:Ironmaidenfun is my volunteer account. LDelench (WMF) (talk) 21:22, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done for 6 months. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 22:24, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

• Acrom12 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I’ve already created a few articles and I often check new pages for sourcing, notability, and overall quality. I also help out in AfD discussions when I can, mostly to look at whether topics meet notability and if the sources are solid. I enjoy helping new editors fix their pages and guiding them on what needs improvement. Since I’m already active in this area, I’d like to take a more direct role in keeping the new pages feed clean and helping page creators understand the basics. Becoming a reviewer would let me contribute more effectively. Thanks for considering my request! Acrom12 (talk) 11:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot ^talk 12:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

• Aplucas0703 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello to the reviewer! I've noticed the large backlog and would like to help make some progress with patrolling pages, mainly redirects. I have some previous experience in the article for creation space, creating my own articles, and creating my own redirects. I try to help new incoming editors, including mentoring my current partner and teaching them how to use the features of Wikipedia. I'm capable of catching content that probably shouldn't belong on Wikipedia, but also helping new users expand draft articles.

I participate in AfD, though my suggestions are often rejected; I consider this a skill that I am still learning. It's worth noting that I have never misused speedy deletion or other non-discussion deletion methods; my usage of these has been successful when I have applied them. Even still, my knowledge of AfC and redirects provides me with a good basis to use this right.

Thank you, and please ask any questions you may have. aaronneallucas (talk) 05:12, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

• Dantheanimator (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've been editing a while and over recent years have been helping mostly with WP:Ukraine-related topics and pages. Having done research on Ukraine on and off-wiki, I would like to extend the help to review new Ukraine and related page creations. I have 7 successful FL nominations (one was a joint-nomination), 1 successful GA (Prelude to the Russian invasion of Ukraine) and 1 unsuccessful (NAFO). Thanks in advance and feel free to ping me with questions/comments. Dan the Animator 01:57, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

• Sweetabena (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I am requesting the New Pages Patrol right.

I have 4,000+ edits, including over 2,500 in mainspace and 500+ article creations. My work has given me solid experience with core content policies, particularly notability GNG, reliable sourcing, verifiability, and BLP compliance. I also participate in AfD discussions and review drafts, which has strengthened my understanding of how these policies apply to new pages.

I would like to support the community by helping maintain the quality of new articles, identifying issues early, and guiding new editors toward constructive contributions. I have no blocks or sanctions.

Thank you for considering my request. Sweetabena (talk) 18:32, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

• Mwwv (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I had initially delayed my reapplication for another trial since I felt I had lost the page-reviewing spunk I had in me, but I think I've gotten back into it. I would like to reapply for another trial, and I will do my page reviewing work along with the upcoming AfC Backlog Drive. I have around 5,000 edits. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 16:56, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done, till Jan end Sohom (talk) 17:11, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

• Monkeysmashingkeyboards (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I'd like NPP rights to help reduce the backlog, as my account has finally reached 90 days old. I've accumulated over 6,000 edits, and I have spent time participating in AfD, and have speedy deleted numerous pages. Cheers! monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 18:30, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([4]). — MusikBot ^talk 18:40, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

• Plutus (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I had a trial earlier this year, with almost no issues (i hope?), and when I requested for a renewal, Rosguill (talk · contribs) said it was too early since my recent block. I hope now that issue is no longer applicable? Plutus 💬 mess — Fortune favors the curious 03:37, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

From reviewing editing histories, it appears I commented on this request for new page reviewer in September. I don’t typically review page mover requests and am not particularly familiar with norms for granting them._signed, Rosguill ^talk 03:51, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Are you actually requesting page mover or did you mean to post this on the New Page Reviewer page? * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:24, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Wrong section, oppss, i meant NPR Plutus 💬 mess — Fortune favors the curious 01:44, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

• Fermiboson (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi, I used to be here quite frequently... like two years ago. I was granted a three month trial period towards the end of my active period and I'd like to continue NPP work and contribute to the backlog drive if that's possible (of course, I also realise I need to derust and am currently doing so!) Fermiboson (talk) 17:30, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done, till Jan end. Sohom (talk) 17:33, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

• Thilio (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

My one month trial of the New Page Reviewer right will expire in 8 days I have really enjoyed working as part of NPP and am grateful to Rosguill for granting me the trial. I would like to request a renewals of the right I know it is slightly early but I would appreciate being considered especially with the December 2025 Backlog Drive approaching. I would LOVE to continue contributing during the drive and beyond. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 21:34, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 7 December 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 21:40, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

• LightandDark2000 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi, I'm LightandDark2000. I have over 13 years of editing Wikipedia, and I'm quite familiar with the page move policies, and other relevant policies on move discussions. I used to have this user right, and since I plan to continue editing periodically, I would like to have this permission back. I was able to use this permission to fight page-move vandalism, handle problematic draft moves and article titles (including my own screwups), and manage my own userspace, and I believe I may have used it after closing some move discussions (although I don't remember when the last time that was). Page-Mover would make my work a lot easier when I need it, instead of having to rely on admins, and I will make good use of the tool. Thanks. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 09:21, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

@LightandDark2000 I'm inclined to grant, but since your return from inactivity you have made no page moves, nor have you edited RM/TR – could you please give an example of a recent case where pagemover would have been helpful, but you had to ask for help instead? Toadspike [Talk] 09:47, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

I haven't requested any moves yet since my return, but here is one example where I would've found it useful (a recent screwup). I got around that by simply creating another redirect at the right target. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 09:50, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

• QEnigma (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

• Shubhsamant09 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I’ve been patrolling recent changes consistently and have handled a substantial amount of vandalism. I also pending changes reviewing rights. Gaining rollback rights would allow me to respond more quickly and effectively, especially during spikes in vandalism, and would support the work I’m already doing. Shubhsamant09 (talk) 00:55, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

• Pyrrhic victor (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've been handling vandalism for quite a while now, I have a chunk more than 1000 edit's the majority of which are dealing in vandalisum(the rest of witch are other simmalar activitys). I mainly use Ultraviolet and ocasionally twinkle but would like to try to use the tools that require rollback. Pyrrhic victor (talk) 15:14, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([5]). — MusikBot ^talk 15:20, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

• Babysharkboss2 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I am requesting rollback after willingly giving up Twinkle, and more recently being suggested I request rollback. I believe Rollback would be beneficial to my patrolling of recent edits. Babysharkb☩ss2 I am Thou, Thou art I 14:40, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

• Mdm.Bla (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have been patrolling recent changes for a while. I currently use Ultraviolet when patrolling recent changes, but would like to try AntiVandal to expand my toolbox, which requires rollback. I use the standard warning templates with Ultraviolet, although I do have a set of "uw-0" style messages that I use occasionally. mdm.bla 03:21, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

• Seanwk (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have been RC patrolling for over two months now. Clicking individual diff links to revert edits is very inefficient and unnecessary, and I believe having rollback could fix this. I've made over 200 edits to mainspace and have no history of edit warring. Seanwk :) ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 02:42, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([6][7]). — MusikBot ^talk 02:50, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

• Acrom12 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

• Graham87 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

This is a non-traditional request as I'm a former admin who hasn't had any particular need to edit [protected templates since my desysopping (though I was a little surprised that I was able to make edits to stub templates like this_, but this user right might become useful to me soon. I'm interested in monitoring the output of the very new User :CSD U6 Bot (also see this discussion for background) and rather than asking for edits to its fully protected ignore list, I thought it would be easier if the page could be template-protected and I (and perhaps other non-admin template editors) could make additions to it). I started a discussion about this at User talk:CSD U6 Bot/Ignore list#Making this page template-protected, etc.? (feel free to contribute to it). The bot owner, Anomie, is unwilling to act unilaterally and sent me to this page, so here I am. When I was an admin I occasionally made accessibility-related edits to protected templates, like this case with fraction and conversion templates/modules. I have a healthy fear of editing highly used templates and would always test any changes in the ssandbox first. I'm one of only two importers and I have a strong and unique password for Wikipedia. Graham87 (talk) 15:22, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

• ZI Jony (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Will useful for NPP, anti-vandalism, and anti-spam works. Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 17:56, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done —Femke 🐦 (talk) 18:00, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

• Nathannah (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

As I've done for years with trying to ward off IP vandalism on articles, I plan to use this tool for long term abuse issues in my areas of interest (especially with sockpuppetry and SPIs) and comparing page edit histories and tracking it appropriately, along with other common anti-vandalism measures. I have read through the full disclosure and plan to comply with all points and any new policies made in the future. Nathannah • 📮 00:50, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done Sohom (talk) 17:27, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

• ZachH007 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello, I am a rollbacker and pending changes reviewer and I actively work on counter-vandalism. Having this permission will allow me to further investigate IPs if situation necessitates. I've read and I agree to the related guidelines. 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 Zach^H007 03:21, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done Sohom (talk) 17:28, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

• Eteethan (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've been here for a while mostly doing counter vandalism work. I'd use this permission to continue what I've been doing. Eteethan (talk) 05:07, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done Sohom (talk) 17:27, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

• Fortuna imperatrix mundi (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi, I've been here some time now, and am an irregularly frequent poster at SPI, AIV and other specialist noticeboards. I was advised I might qualify for this, and have decided to do so now that I'm finding it increasingly difficult to identify TA "evidence". For example, the tool would have come in handy at that linked discussion, also at this SPI and most recently today. I undertand the legal implications supporting this right—basically a similar spirit that controls the linking of IPs and accounts at SPI, in a nutshell?—the balance between discretion and disclosure, and have made myself conversant with WP:TAIV; I am also aware that the patrolling admin is permitted to decline applicants who meet these criteria but are otherwise unsuitable for access to this tool. Cheers, —Fortuna, imperatrix 17:23, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:25, 30 November 2025 (UTC)