Template:Admin dashboard
Administrative backlog
Reports
- ~2026-31243-26 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 812 five times in the last 5 minutes (Unreasonably large addition of content, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:53, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
- SalonSage (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1361 (LTA 1361, details). Note: Please see the comment at the top of Special:AbuseFilter/1361 before proceeding. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 20:58, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-32427-04 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 139 (Fixed position vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 22:30, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
- Jmarrdawundum5$ (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 23:44, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-32507-84 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 384 five times in the last 5 minutes (Addition of bad words or other vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:36, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Probably. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:10, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-32580-57 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 984 (AIV / Noticeboard disruption 2, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:39, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
- Fuhgoonalicious (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 614 five times in the last 5 minutes (Memes and vandalism trends (moomer slang + zoomer slang), details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:17, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
User-reported
- Maco567 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - adding unsourced changes, including to a now-protected article, ignoring talk-page warnings. Seasider53 (talk) 17:44, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. Since the most recent edit has not been reverted and I can't tell if it's disruptive or not. Daniel Case (talk) 18:00, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
- It’s the same as all their preceding edits: as in, unsourced. Seasider53 (talk) 18:09, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
- They’re back at it. I’m done playing the reverting game. Seasider53 (talk) 02:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
- It’s the same as all their preceding edits: as in, unsourced. Seasider53 (talk) 18:09, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
- قرية كواكوا المائية3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Salebot1. Mesocyclonic93 (t)(c) 19:24, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
- Ardiansrfh (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Vandalised past 4th warning and engaging edit war in Perseden Denpasar page. Wira rhea (talk) 22:17, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-32587-25 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Edit warring. (If this is the wrong place, please ping me and send me to the correct place) Dafootballguy | Want to talk? 22:32, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Dafootballguy WP:ANEW? Starlet! (Need to talk?) (Library) (Sandbox) 01:51, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:08, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-32404-00 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Vandalism past final warning Dafootballguy | Want to talk? 01:33, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
- The admin who checks this out should see the talk page first. Dafootballguy | Want to talk? 01:41, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
- This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:07, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-31930-84 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) IP user resubmtting repeatedly rejected draft on a contentious topic without required improvements Drew Stanley (talk) 02:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
- Mikedhamellpress (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Marc B. Nathanson: Block evasion of the same editor behind ~2026-22705-80. As with that temp and its IPs, the account should be blocked from editing the relevant pages. ~. Pbritti (talk) 04:34, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-29962-31 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Disruptive editing/vandalism across multiple talk pages and articles. I had issued a warning earlier regarding their disruptive talk page edit requests, namely copying/pasting the entire article as an 'edit request'. However, just saw a few of their other edits on other articles, with entirely false edits/misleading edit summaries, including: [1], [2], [3], [4], and [5]. Definitely starting to seem like a possible WP:NOTHERE now. Magitroopa (talk) 05:04, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
- May also possibly be more beneficial to block the /64 IP range. Magitroopa (talk) 05:06, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
- SquawkyPenguin (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Usernameusername17 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- SMMSocmedmanagement (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Not from Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
Current requests for increase in protection level
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – nonsense editing on the talk page. Skyshiftertalk 13:41, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
Reason: High level account vandalism and dissemination of fake news SMMSocmedmanagement (talk) 02:34, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The Bushranger One ping only 04:19, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. EndzoneEnthusiast 02:55, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting semi-protection due to repeated vandalism and non-constructive edits by unregistered and newly registered users. Protection would help maintain the integrity of the article while consensus is established regarding disputed content. SMMSocmedmanagement (talk) 03:11, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also please do not use AI/LLMs to generate RFPP requests; the behavior described as occurring in the article was hallucinated. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:24, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:RUSUKR. Isi96 (talk) 03:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. The Bushranger One ping only 04:22, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Reason: We have reached a consensus against including "Brazilian" in the lead sentence (per Talk:Morena Baccarin#"Brazilian actress"), and there have been hidden notes attached to both the lead sentence and the short description; yet TAs repeatedly added "Brazilian" to the lead sentence and/or the short description. Requesting pending changes protection. Thanks in advance, Thedarkknightli (talk) 03:36, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The Bushranger One ping only 04:18, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal using various temp accounts breaking page. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:48, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Reason: constant vandalism (Semi-protection) ReelCosmix (talk) 04:02, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: NoahTheBoa7868 (talk · contribs). - The Bushranger One ping only 04:15, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 04:30, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Several edits that were made by a questionable account. SteamManx (talk) 05:07, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Reason: Protected by Courcelles (whose last contribution of note was on 27 December 2025) on 15 August 2023 when this page was titled "Disney Junior (programming block)". No disruption whatsover from unconfirmed accounts for almost two years now as per the contributions page. Also RMs and CFDS shaped its change till now. Please consider unprotecting these titles; sorry if this is lengthy! Intrisit (talk) 14:11, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
- I think this may be the target of an active LTA? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v MUSHROOM 17:43, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
- Of course there's been no disruption from uncomfirmed accounts, since it was protected to require extended confirmed access. This is proof that protection is working. I also suspect there's an LTA that targets this but would wait for confirmation. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:50, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Since the "Ohio" meme has died down in popularity, I believe that this page's protection should be reduced from Extended confirmed protection to Semi-protection. There also hasn't been that much vandalism since then. Cityboiiiiii (talk) 18:37, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 4 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:05, 31 May 2026 (UTC) |
| 21 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:42, 1 June 2026 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
Greetings dear colleagues! I'd be honored with humility if I am worthy of an autopatrolled status. Regards, An emperor ✖ 02:57, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Recent articles Ryan Atkin, Chelsea Pride, Proud Lilywhites, Chelsea rent boy, Lucy Clark shows they are familiar with WP:GNG. Their articles are well-sourced throughout and neutral, and the articles of Atkin & Clark demonstrate familiarity with BLP. Routinely creates articles, with 10 so far from this month alone, all of which have no outstanding issues from what I can see. jolielover♥talk 13:04, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Hello folks! Till date, I have created about 45 mainspace articles; mostly films, web series, biographies, places of worship and a historical landmark (my most recent creation). I would love to have the Autopatrolled rights; and it might help prevent the piling up of the NPR backlog, even just by a bit. And I believe I am qualified for this. If I am judged ineligible, I would be happy to work upon myself if my shortcomings are pointed out. Thanks! BhikhariInformer (talk) 11:28, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Good morning/day/evening my fellow Wikipedians. After 15 years, 200k+ edits and creating a lot of stuff here I think it is time to apply for Autopatrolled permission. I have created about 200 list articles and 150+ other main space articles, mostly biographies. Although I love all my children I'm especially proud of next WIR contributions: Elske ter Veld · Corry Vonk · Leontien Ceulemans · Mady Saks · Caro van Eyck · Fien de la Mar · Pia Beck · Esther de Boer-van Rijk · Annie de Reuver · Martine Bijl · Josine van Dalsum · Margarita Manso · Ágata Lys · Christiane Klapisch-Zuber · Nina Verchinina · Constance Morrow Morgan · Patricia Lousada
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
I would like to create lists of articles I might want to edit based on Regex and categories. Because of my current computing setup I will need to use JWB, which, unlike AWB, requires being on the check page for all actions, including generating lists. I do not intend to actually make any semi-automated edits until I'm more confident in my Regex skills, and am willing to make another request when that time comes. JarJarInks٩(◕_◕)۶Tones essay 15:25, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
I have been participating Guild of Copye Editor for long time. To save time doing some tedious editing. GreenRedFlag (talk) 19:48, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
Username change, was Purin128AL. Purin475 (talk) 12:54, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed
I have 52 edits, two in-progress drafts, one draft I haven't started writing yet, and have been an editor for a few days (not long enough for autoconfirmed though). I was editing an article yesterday, and several temporary/new accounts started vandalizing/edit-warring over false assumptions of current events. Anyways, that article is now temporarily semi-protected due to my request and I just realized that I locked myself out of editing that article. I also would like the page creation rights that come with confirmed/auto-confirmed. I know this is unlikely but thought I might as well ask. FlammablePizza (talk) 13:08, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Rajeev Morena (talk) 14:00, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed
Hello, I am reapplying for the Extended Confirmed permission following the resolution of an Arbitration Enforcement request the AE result from January 2026. My EC permission was previously revoked due to 'permission gaming' and a shift into contentious topics. According to the AE result, I was instructed to wait at least 30 days and complete 500 additional constructive edits before reapplying. It has now been over three months, and I’ve reached that milestone with 500 new edits. Since the initial block was removed, I’ve taken the advice I received here initial unblock request to heart and I’ve been using the "Preview" button every time before I publish changes just to double check my self, to avoid making too many small edits. I’ve focused on trying to know and better understand wikipedia, which i find fascinating, i joined a couple of projects, such as merge, redirect, short descriptions, and discovered how important it is to perform these maintenance edits to keep the encyclopedia better and safe, i plan on joining more projects, and improve my understanding of wikipedia. I'd appreciate it if you could reassess my edits and consider removing my current restrictions, and restore my EC. I would not repeat my previous mistakes. Happypenguins82 (talk) 11:37, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator |
| Requests for file mover |
|---|
File mover
I have been contributing to Wikimedia projects since 2012, primarily on Turkish Wikipedia, English Wikipedia, Wikidata, and Wikimedia Commons. I would like to be added to the File mover user group so that I can help correct file naming issues, improve the accuracy and organisation of file usage, and contribute to the overall quality of content across Wikimedia projects. Thank you. -- bluetime93 💬 07:18, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
My current NPP trial run ends at the end of the month. I'd like to continue patrolling after the drive ends in order to help prevent the backlog from swelling back up again (whether on another trial run or on a permanent basis). EaglesFan37 (talk) 18:01, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
Hello again! I am once again requesting permanent permission to patrol new pages. I hope that I performed well during my last trial run. Sarge Graham (talk) 07:44, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
I am familiar with the guidelines for Wikipedia’s New Pages Patrol (NPP) reviewers and would like to apply for reviewer rights. I believe I meet all the criteria mentioned in WP:NPRCRITERIA. 𝓖𝓲𝓻𝓭𝓲➃➄ ✍️ (talk) 16:38, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
Back in March, I asked for another shot at NPP and was given another month's trial. After submitting a request for permanent rights to the permission,@Rosguill: stated my track record was mostly fine, but suggested I have another trial run for a month due to UPE and notability questions. Although I haven't been as active as I anticipated for NPP this past month, I am now requesting full permanent rights to the permission (once again). If my latest run suggests I am not qualified for the full rights, that is fine, and I completely understand. However, I feel like I can still contribute meaningfully and continue to grow my skills (and that in turn will help deal with the backlog). In any event, thank you for considering my request(s) and for the oppportunity via the trial run(s). Losipov (talk) 20:58, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
Hello! I was granted a one-month trial run for New Page Reviewer rights, which are set to expire in a few days. I am requesting that my rights be extended so I can continue to review pages. I have been working on the May backlog drive and would like to continue helping out moving forward. Thanks in advance for your consideration! FiddleheadLady (talk) 00:46, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
Hi! I'd like to participate by helping out with tasks, and to help reduce the new pages backlog. Olugold (talk) 06:43, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to participate by reverting vandalism and malicious edits. Thanks! Retro music11 (talk) 21:17, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
I'm currently temporarily approved for NPR rights and I've been participating in the May 2026 backlog drive. I'm finding the review process good so far and I take pride in reducing the backlog. I'm hoping I can get an extension in my NPR rights so I can continue working on reviewing new pages. Thanks, DoO2 02:48, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
I'd like to request the NPP rights to help with reviewing new pages. Comfortable assessing notability, sourcing and tone, and aware of when a page is best tagged, draftified, or sent to AfD. Familiar with the relevant policies and guidelines (WP:NPP, WP:CSD, WP:N, WP:BLP, WP:V, etc.), and I'll be careful and civil with new editors. Thanks. Xoonkowa (talk) 17:28, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Hi! I've been reviewing and learning the process for the past month, and I would like to continue learning and contributing with the ever growing list of new articles. Thanks! TouchedWithFire (talk) 06:43, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
I was given NPP rights on a trial basis for the May drive; since then, I've reviewed 25 articles and various redirects, and I'd like to continue helping to reduce the backlog. I always check the NPP flowchart carefully and leave things alone if I'm in doubt. Thanks for your time. Crestfalling (talk/contribs) 03:07, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Hi, I’d like participate on solving vandalism and proper the article. I focus mainly on Malayalam films article pages. If I’m worthy you can approve me. Thanks! Airbtl (talk) 05:42, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Hi. I'm interested in becoming a new page reviewer. I've familiarized myself with the tutorial and hopefully I can be more helpful here. Gert7 (talk · contribs) 18:13, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Hi, I am currently considering becoming a new page reviewer. Now, I would prefer receiving temporary rights as I'm not sure if I would forever want to be one. I have recently been granted autopatrolled rights. As of today, I have created 104 articles and have over 1,800 edits. Thanks, Fortek67 (talk) 11:14, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Due to expire tomorrow, and would like to continue helping with NPP if possible. Thank you. Porterjoh (talk) 05:32, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
I have been contributing to Wikimedia projects since 2012, primarily on Turkish Wikipedia, English Wikipedia, Wikidata, and Wikimedia Commons. I would like to be added to the Page mover user group so that I can help improve article quality, correct page title issues, and assist with carrying out page moves in a more accurate and efficient manner. Thank you. -- bluetime93 💬 07:17, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
Hello, I am requesting pending changes rights, I want to use the rights to approve or disapprove pending changes, especially, for unsourced edits, Thank you. Allblessed (talk) 10:08, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
I already do antivandalism work on the Recent Pages Patrol using UV and Twinkle and being a pending changes reviewer would be helpful for antivandalism. Cl00m)Red -|talk|- 22:55, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
I’ve been active in anti‑vandalism work, issuing warnings and reverting disruptive edits, especially on BLPs. I try to follow policy carefully and keep pages stable. I’d like to request Pending Changes reviewer rights. AriuCH (talk) 23:48, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights Hello. I'd like to request the ability to accept or decline pending changes on both of my accounts (User:Wikipedian12512 and User:Wikipedian12512(alt). I've read the relevant policies (BLP, Vandalism, Copyright Violations, etc.), and think that I could do a reasonable (to start, I'd probably get better over time) job. Thank you! Wikipedian12512 (Talking is fine | contribs) 13:07, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
Here to renew my temp perms, I use it on off when I can and idk if I qualify for perm RB yet. JoBo Gamer 11:29, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
I've been working the recent changes patrol with a focus on anti-vandalism and I'd like access to rollback to enhance this work. I currently use Ultraviolet and sometimes Twinkle as part of my tools. I try to warn consistently and communicate if there are any questions. Thanks y'all! netstars22 (talk) 15:02, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
I requested before, however it was denied. I have now intercepted vandalism while doing Recent Changes Patrol. Also, I have used Twinkle's rollback feature, but I am seeking rollback as a backup. I am also planning on using AntiVandal. Thanks! Robloxguest3 (talk)
Hi! I've been patrolling recent changes and filter logs for about a month using UV and Twinkle. I am familiar with warning users and submitting ARV and UAA reports. I'd like to try out more efficient tools like AntiVandal and WikiShield. TurquoiseGoose (talk) 05:44, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
Hello, I am applying again after my request got denied. I have been actively reverting vandalism and bad unconstructive edits more than before. I always 100% of the time let the user know why I reverted their edit. And I would like to use tools like Huggle to revert vandalism even faster. And now I have 296 edits in the mainspace, so I have much more experience. I am honestly a great vandal fighter and would benefit from rollback rights. Thank you for reading! Hamimh2 (talk) 18:31, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
Hi, I've been a pending changes reviewer for a little while now and I've also patrolled recent changes undoing vandalism for quite some time. I've spent the last while spending time reviewing recent changes and pending changes, on top of contributing to articles and discussions as I normally do. I am an active editor that regularly makes constructive edits to a variety of articles and topics, having improved and expanded a lot of pages. I have a very deep understanding of site policies and regularly bring up policy in Talk discussions before anything else. I think having rollback rights would help me expand my patrolling contributions, notably in preventing vandalism, and result in a net benefit for Wikipedia. Thanks for considering! HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 03:10, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
OK, I've reviewed what I was told at my last request. I now have over 200 mainspace edits. I've tried singing up to CVU/A, and now I'm just waiting. Requesting rollback permissions to try AntiVandal, Interceptor, and Huggle. And everything else. Patrolling RecentChanges seems to be the only thing I do nowadays, and I would like rollback to be able to fight vandals better. AZenit3 [Chat?-stuff I've done] 01:47, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
My temporary rollback permissions will expire soon. Throughout the "trial" for rollback, I have been utilizing Interceptor, Wikishield, and manual RB for counter-vandalism tasks. And I would like to still have access to those tools for much easier patrolling.Scoria (talk) 08:11, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Been patrolling recent changes for some time now with Twinkle, and I would like to try using more advanced tools like Huggle which require this permission. TheNerdzilla (talk) 13:45, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
I have been contributing to Wikimedia projects since 2012, primarily on Turkish Wikipedia, English Wikipedia, Wikidata, and Wikimedia Commons. I would like to be added to the Rollbacker user group so that I can combat vandalism more effectively and further improve the quality of my contributions. Thank you. -- bluetime93 💬 07:12, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor
I have been maintaining and making small corrections and updates to several templates on and off, e.g. {{Cite Grove}}, {{Climate chart}}, and various infoboxes, navs, and so on. These have not required TE, but I would like to maintain the New Zealand sections of the {{Inflation}} templates, without having to make requests (most recently thanks go to P.I. Ellsworth) — Jonathanischoice (talk) 11:14, 26 May 2026 (UTC) Jonathanischoice (talk) 11:14, 26 May 2026 (UTC) I support this 20+ year veteran's bid for the TE bit! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. – welcome! – 11:25, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for temporary account IP viewer |
|---|
Temporary account IP viewer
Would like to be able to check for signs of loutsocking on articles. I have suspicions that someone has done some very slow loutsocking on the article for Nathan Vasquez for example. Insanityclown1 (talk) 03:34, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
Hi! I do a lot of work dealing with sockpuppetry and WP:LTA cases as well as general anti-vandalism. TAIV rights would make it easier for me to identify abusive editing and socking. I have read and understood the WMF's TAIV policy and WP:TAIV. enbi [they/them] • [talk] 23:01, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Following ANI and SPI; we came across dozens of TAs being used for changing navbox colors in violation to MOS. They have been now tagged and blocked now, but the latest TA just started two days ago.. leaving the possibility of more to come... In the meantime, I would also like to help out with other similar SPI cases involving TAs as well. Vestrian24Bio 11:08, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
I am asking for this right to deal with vandalism better, such as determining whether multiple temporary accounts have the same underlying address so it can be reported and blocked. I agree to and will obey the policies. -- Least Action (talk) 11:40, 31 May 2026 (UTC) |
Usage
{{Admin dashboard/header}}
{{Admin dashboard/ab}}
{{#ifeq:{{Yesno|{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}|yes|{{#ifexpr:{{#time:U|-{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}-{{#time:U|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP:WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism}}}} <= 0|{{Admin dashboard/aiv}}}}}}
{{Admin dashboard/csd}}
{{Admin dashboard/uaarfpp}}
{{Admin dashboard/rfarfp
| 1 = {{{style|}}}{{#if:{{{showperm|}}}|
{{!}} showperm {{=}} {{{showperm}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrfab|}}}|
{{!}} showrfab {{=}} {{{showrfab}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showacc}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showaptl|}}}|
{{!}} showaptl {{=}} {{{showaptl}}} }}{{#if:{{{showawb|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showawb}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showconf|}}}|
{{!}} showconf {{=}} {{{showconf}}} }}{{#if:{{{showfmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showext {{=}} {{{showext}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showevco}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showext|}}}|
{{!}} showfmvr {{=}} {{{showfmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showmms|}}}|
{{!}} showmms {{=}} {{{showmms}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrevr|}}}|
{{!}} shownpr {{=}} {{{shownpr}}} }}{{#if:{{{shownpr|}}}|
{{!}} showpmvr {{=}} {{{showpmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showpmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showrevr {{=}} {{{showrevr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrlbk|}}}|
{{!}} showrlbk {{=}} {{{showrlbk}}} }}{{#if:{{{showte|}}}|
{{!}} showte {{=}} {{{showte}}} }}{{#if:{{{showtaiv|}}}|
{{!}} showtaiv {{=}} {{{showtaiv}}} }}
}}
{{Admin dashboard/footer|newadmin={{{newadmin|no}}}}}<!--
You can re-arrange the order or pick and choose by transcluding elements separately -->
Note that directly transcluding the template or using all the subtemplates above can cause the page to exceed the post-expand include size.
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely show of purpose at this time. | String | optional |
| New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
| Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
| Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show temporary account IP viewer | showtaiv | Allows hiding the requests for temporary account IP viewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |